20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM005 vs Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6

9.4 Winter
LM005
Bridgestone
265/40R20 104H BRIDGESTONE BLIZZAK LM005 ,XL ,RP ,R0 ,3PMSF ,EV
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
from 87 647 Ft
9.1 Winter
BLIZZAK 6
Bridgestone
265/40R20 104W BRIDGESTONE BLIZZAK 6 ,XL ,RP ,3PMSF ,Enliten
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance B Wet grip B Noise B
from 106 824 Ft
9.4 LM005 LM005 from 87 647 Ft
9.1 BLIZZAK 6 BLIZZAK 6 from 106 824 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,4
9,1
Price from
87 647 Ft ▲ najlacnejšia
106 824 Ft
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Rolling resistance B Wet grip B Noise B
Discipline comparison
Snow
53 +2 %
35 tests
75 +2 % ▲
23 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
80 +3 %
31 tests
83 +3 % ▲
20 tests
snow traction
73 +2 %
27 tests
76 +3 % ▲
18 tests
snow handling
58 ≈ average
26 tests
72 +2 % ▲
16 tests
Wet
92 +8 % ▲
35 tests
76 +4 %
22 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
100 +14 % ▲
30 tests
93 +9 %
19 tests
Aquaplaning
91 +9 % ▲
29 tests
77 +4 %
19 tests
wet handling
98 +4 % ▲
26 tests
82 +3 %
16 tests
Dry
42 ≈ average
29 tests
53 ≈ average ▲
19 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
55 ≈ average
29 tests
58 +1 % ▲
19 tests
dry handling
88 ≈ average
25 tests
94 +1 % ▲
12 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
3 Tests
– Not measured.
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
14 −4 %
3 Tests
83 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
Economy
56 −4 %
30 tests
79 +7 % ▲
20 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
94 +7 % ▲
29 tests
85 +7 %
20 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
17 −17 %
9 tests weakness
78 +7 % ▲
6 tests
Noise and comfort
85 ≈ average ▲
29 tests
79 ≈ average
17 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
29 ≈ average
27 tests
44 ≈ average ▲
15 tests
ride comfort
74 Not measured. ▲
60 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
OE OE
✓ iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile OE OE
3PMSF 3PMSF Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 265/40 R20 among 14 available

9.4 Bridgestone LM005
tested in R20
9.1 Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6
tested only in R16, R17, R18, R19
Snow
53 +2 %
35 tests
75 +2 % ▲
23 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
80 +3 %
31 tests
83 +3 % ▲
20 tests
snow traction
73 +2 %
27 tests
76 +3 % ▲
18 tests
snow handling
58 ≈ average
26 tests
72 +2 % ▲
16 tests
Wet
92 +8 % ▲
35 tests
76 +4 %
22 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
100 +14 % ▲
30 tests
93 +9 %
19 tests
Aquaplaning
91 +9 % ▲
29 tests
77 +4 %
19 tests
wet handling
98 +4 % ▲
26 tests
82 +3 %
16 tests
Dry
42 ≈ average
29 tests
53 ≈ average ▲
19 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
55 ≈ average
29 tests
58 +1 % ▲
19 tests
dry handling
88 ≈ average
25 tests
94 +1 % ▲
12 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
3 Tests
– Not measured.
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
14 −4 %
3 Tests
83 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
Economy
56 −4 %
30 tests
79 +7 % ▲
20 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
94 +7 % ▲
29 tests
85 +7 %
20 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
17 −17 %
9 tests weakness
78 +7 % ▲
6 tests
Noise and comfort
85 ≈ average ▲
29 tests
79 ≈ average
17 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
29 ≈ average
27 tests
44 ≈ average ▲
15 tests
ride comfort
74 Not measured. ▲
60 Not measured.