20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM005 vs Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6

9.4 Winter
LM005
Bridgestone
285/40R19 107W BRIDGESTONE BLIZZAK LM005 ,XL ,RP ,L ,3PMSF
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
from 115 264 Ft
9.1 Winter
BLIZZAK 6
Bridgestone
285/40R19 107W BRIDGESTONE BLIZZAK 6 ,XL ,RP ,3PMSF ,Enliten
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise A
from 106 055 Ft
9.4 LM005 LM005 from 115 264 Ft
9.1 BLIZZAK 6 BLIZZAK 6 from 106 055 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,4
9,1
Price from
115 264 Ft
106 055 Ft ▲ najlacnejšia
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise A
Discipline comparison
Snow
35 ≈ average
35 tests
55 ≈ average ▲
23 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
80 +3 %
31 tests
83 +3 % ▲
20 tests
snow traction
73 +2 %
27 tests
76 +3 % ▲
18 tests
snow handling
58 ≈ average
26 tests
72 +2 % ▲
16 tests
Wet
95 +6 % ▲
35 tests
65 +2 %
22 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
100 +14 % ▲
30 tests
93 +9 %
19 tests
Aquaplaning
91 +9 % ▲
29 tests
77 +4 %
19 tests
wet handling
98 +4 % ▲
26 tests
82 +3 %
16 tests
Dry
45 ≈ average
29 tests
65 ≈ average ▲
19 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
55 ≈ average
29 tests
58 +1 % ▲
19 tests
dry handling
88 ≈ average
25 tests
94 +1 % ▲
12 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
3 Tests
– Not measured.
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
14 −4 %
3 Tests
83 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
Economy
45 −6 %
30 tests
65 +5 % ▲
20 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
94 +7 % ▲
29 tests
85 +7 %
20 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
17 −17 %
9 tests
78 +7 % ▲
6 tests
Noise and comfort
83 ≈ average ▲
29 tests
72 ≈ average
17 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
29 ≈ average
27 tests
44 ≈ average ▲
15 tests
ride comfort
74 Not measured. ▲
60 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
OE OE
✓ iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile OE OE
3PMSF 3PMSF Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 285/40 R19 among 7 available

9.4 Bridgestone LM005
tested in R19
9.1 Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6
tested in R19
Snow
35 ≈ average
35 tests
55 ≈ average ▲
23 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
80 +3 %
31 tests
83 +3 % ▲
20 tests
snow traction
73 +2 %
27 tests
76 +3 % ▲
18 tests
snow handling
58 ≈ average
26 tests
72 +2 % ▲
16 tests
Wet
95 +6 % ▲
35 tests
65 +2 %
22 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
100 +14 % ▲
30 tests
93 +9 %
19 tests
Aquaplaning
91 +9 % ▲
29 tests
77 +4 %
19 tests
wet handling
98 +4 % ▲
26 tests
82 +3 %
16 tests
Dry
45 ≈ average
29 tests
65 ≈ average ▲
19 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
55 ≈ average
29 tests
58 +1 % ▲
19 tests
dry handling
88 ≈ average
25 tests
94 +1 % ▲
12 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
3 Tests
– Not measured.
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
14 −4 %
3 Tests
83 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
Economy
45 −6 %
30 tests
65 +5 % ▲
20 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
94 +7 % ▲
29 tests
85 +7 %
20 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
17 −17 %
9 tests
78 +7 % ▲
6 tests
Noise and comfort
83 ≈ average ▲
29 tests
72 ≈ average
17 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
29 ≈ average
27 tests
44 ≈ average ▲
15 tests
ride comfort
74 Not measured. ▲
60 Not measured.