4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4 vs Bridgestone LM005

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
–
9,2
Discipline comparison
Snow
–
73 +2 %
34 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
–
82 +3 %
30 tests
snow traction
–
71 +2 %
26 tests
snow handling
–
58 ≈ average
25 tests
Wet
–
99 +12 %
34 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
–
100 +15 %
29 tests
Aquaplaning
–
91 +10 %
28 tests
wet handling
–
98 +4 %
25 tests
Dry
–
74 ≈ average
28 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
–
59 ≈ average
28 tests
dry handling
–
88 ≈ average
24 tests
Ice
–
15 −4 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
–
13 −4 %
3 Tests
Economy
–
58 −3 %
29 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
–
95 +7 %
28 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
–
15 −17 %
9 tests weakness
Noise and comfort
–
95 ≈ average
28 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
–
32 ≈ average
26 tests
ride comfort
–
71 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S M+S
✓
✓ Only in some sizes
OE OE
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
ROF ROF
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Sound Sound
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Made for EVs Made for EVs
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S* OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* Sound (noise reduction) Sound* Made for EVs Made for EVs*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 172 winter tyres

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 from 94 measurements · 34 tests
beats 108 of 148
73 +2,3 %
Subcategories snow

snow braking

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 30 tests
beats 120 of 147
82 +3,0 %

snow traction

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 26 tests
beats 83 of 117
71 +1,9 %

snow handling

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 25 tests
beats 70 of 122
58 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 from 116 measurements · 34 tests
beats 170 of 172
99 +11,7 %
Subcategories wet

wet braking

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 29 tests
beats 170 of 171
100 +14,5 %

Aquaplaning

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 28 tests
beats 121 of 134
91 +9,5 %

wet handling

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 25 tests
beats 124 of 127
98 +3,8 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 from 52 measurements · 28 tests
beats 98 of 133
74 ≈ average
Subcategories dry

dry braking

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 28 tests
beats 78 of 133
59 ≈ average

dry handling

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 24 tests
beats 103 of 117
88 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Ice

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 from 3 measurements · 3 tests
beats 10 of 72
15 −4,0 %
Subcategories ice

ice braking

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 3 tests
beats 9 of 72
13 −4,0 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 from 40 measurements · 29 tests
beats 77 of 133
58 −2,7 %
Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 28 tests
beats 121 of 128
95 +7,1 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 9 tests
beats 14 of 95
15 −17,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 from 26 measurements · 28 tests
beats 121 of 128
95 ≈ average
Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005 26 tests
beats 40 of 126
32 ≈ average

ride comfort

Bridgestone BLIZZAK LM-25 4X4
– Not measured.
Bridgestone LM005
beats 45 of 64
71 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.