Comparison Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT vs Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT EVO
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,6
8,7
Price from
74 028 Ft
64 455 Ft ▲ najlacnejšia
EU štítok
Discipline comparison
96 +7 % ▲
89 ≈ average
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
97 +13 % ▲
88 −7 %
Aquaplaning
43 +1 %
50 +1 % ▲
wet handling
100 +5 % ▲
97 +5 %
98 +5 % ▲
89 +5 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
99 +7 % ▲
93 +7 %
dry handling
98 +2 % ▲
92 +3 %
16 −7 %
43 −1 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
2 −14 %
12 −9 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
74 +3 %
79 +7 % ▲
11 −1 %
80 −2 % ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
3 −1 % ▲
2 −2 %
ride comfort
5 Not measured.
‹
80 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 255/35 R18 among 50 available
8.6 Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT
tested in R18
8.7 Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT EVO
tested only in R17, R19
96 +7 % ▲
89 ≈ average
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 30 tests 5 tests weakness
97 +13 % ▲
88 −7 %
Aquaplaning 32 tests 5 tests
43 +1 %
50 +1 % ▲
wet handling 28 tests 5 tests
100 +5 % ▲
97 +5 %
98 +5 % ▲
89 +5 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 30 tests 5 tests
99 +7 % ▲
93 +7 %
dry handling 30 tests 5 tests
98 +2 % ▲
92 +3 %
16 −7 %
43 −1 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 30 tests 5 tests
2 −14 %
12 −9 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 5 tests 1 test 1 test
74 +3 %
79 +7 % ▲
11 −1 %
80 −2 % ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 23 tests 5 tests
3 −1 % ▲
2 −2 %
ride comfort
5 Not measured.
‹
80 Not measured. ▲