4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S vs Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
–
8,0
Discipline comparison
Snow
–
60 ≈ average
9 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
–
50 ≈ average
8 tests
snow traction
–
77 +2 %
3 Tests
snow handling
–
67 ≈ average
8 tests
Wet
–
87 +8 %
9 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
–
90 +10 %
8 tests
Aquaplaning
–
53 +4 %
7 tests
wet handling
–
93 +3 %
8 tests
Dry
–
49 ≈ average
8 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
–
14 −1 %
8 tests
dry handling
–
86 ≈ average
8 tests
Ice
–
– Not measured.
Economy
–
81 +6 %
7 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
–
69 +5 %
7 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
–
82 +6 %
1 Test 1 test
Noise and comfort
–
77 ≈ average
7 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
–
30 ≈ average
7 tests
ride comfort
–
68 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S M+S
✓ Only in some sizes
✓
OE OE
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
ROF ROF
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Seal Seal
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S* OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* Seal (self-sealing technology) Seal* Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 172 winter tyres

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P from 21 measurements · 9 tests
beats 88 of 148
60 ≈ average
Subcategories snow

snow braking

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 8 tests
beats 73 of 147
50 ≈ average

snow traction

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 3 tests
beats 90 of 117
77 +1,6 %

snow handling

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 8 tests
beats 81 of 122
67 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P from 27 measurements · 9 tests
beats 149 of 172
87 +8,1 %
Subcategories wet

wet braking

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 8 tests
beats 154 of 171
90 +9,7 %

Aquaplaning

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 7 tests
beats 71 of 134
53 +4,4 %

wet handling

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 8 tests
beats 118 of 127
93 +3,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P from 16 measurements · 8 tests
beats 65 of 133
49 ≈ average
Subcategories dry

dry braking

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 8 tests
beats 18 of 133
14 −1,3 %

dry handling

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 8 tests
beats 100 of 117
86 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P from 8 measurements · 7 tests
beats 107 of 133
81 +5,5 %
Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 7 tests
beats 88 of 128
69 +4,9 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 1 test
beats 77 of 95
82 +5,6 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P from 7 measurements · 7 tests
beats 98 of 128
77 ≈ average
Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 7 tests
beats 37 of 126
30 ≈ average

ride comfort

Continental CONTIWINTERCONTACT TS 810 S
– Not measured.
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
beats 42 of 64
68 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.