4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S vs Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
–
9,3
Discipline comparison
Snow
–
78 +3 %
38 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
–
79 +3 %
33 tests
snow traction
–
62 +1 %
30 tests
snow handling
–
90 +2 %
28 tests
Wet
–
92 +8 %
38 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
–
91 +9 %
32 tests
Aquaplaning
–
82 +6 %
33 tests
wet handling
–
92 +3 %
29 tests
Dry
–
93 +2 %
31 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
–
87 +3 %
31 tests
dry handling
–
96 +1 %
25 tests
Ice
–
26 −4 %
4 Tests
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
–
28 −4 %
4 Tests
ice traction
–
2 −10 %
1 Test 1 test
Economy
–
78 +6 %
34 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
–
96 +9 %
32 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
–
38 ≈ average
9 tests
Noise and comfort
–
96 ≈ average
30 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
–
43 ≈ average
26 tests
ride comfort
–
74 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S M+S
✓
✓
OE OE
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Sound Sound
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
ROF ROF
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
–
Seal Seal
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* Sound (noise reduction) Sound* Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF*
3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* Sound (noise reduction) Sound* Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* Seal (self-sealing technology) Seal*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 172 winter tyres

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P from 106 measurements · 38 tests
beats 115 of 148
78 +2,5 %
Subcategories snow

snow braking

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 33 tests
beats 115 of 147
79 +2,6 %

snow traction

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 30 tests
beats 72 of 117
62 +1,4 %

snow handling

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 28 tests
beats 109 of 122
90 +2,2 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P from 137 measurements · 38 tests
beats 158 of 172
92 +8,4 %
Subcategories wet

wet braking

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 32 tests
beats 155 of 171
91 +9,4 %

Aquaplaning

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 33 tests
beats 110 of 134
82 +6,3 %

wet handling

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 29 tests
beats 116 of 127
92 +3,0 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P from 56 measurements · 31 tests
beats 123 of 133
93 +2,4 %
Subcategories dry

dry braking

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 31 tests
beats 115 of 133
87 +3,1 %

dry handling

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 25 tests
beats 112 of 117
96 +1,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Ice

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P from 5 measurements · 4 tests
beats 18 of 72
26 −4,0 %
Subcategories ice

ice braking

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 4 tests
beats 20 of 72
28 −3,6 %

ice traction

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 1 test
beats 0 of 23
2 −9,9 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P from 45 measurements · 34 tests
beats 103 of 133
78 +5,9 %
Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 32 tests
beats 123 of 128
96 +8,7 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 9 tests
beats 36 of 95
38 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P from 26 measurements · 30 tests
beats 122 of 128
96 ≈ average
Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P 26 tests
beats 54 of 126
43 ≈ average

ride comfort

Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 860 S
– Not measured.
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
beats 47 of 64
74 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.