Comparison Falken E. ZIEX vs Nexen N'FERA RU1
7.8 
E. ZIEX
E. ZIEX 5.4 
N'FERA RU1
N'FERA RU1 Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,8
5,4
Discipline comparison
Wet 55 +3 % ▲
33 +2 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
70 +4 % ▲
42 +2 %
Aquaplaning
11 −3 %
29 −2 % ▲
wet handling
38 ≈ average
39 ≈ average ▲
Dry 84 +5 % ▲
38 −1 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
88 +5 % ▲
44 −2 %
dry handling
67 +3 % ▲
24 −1 %
Economy 92 +15 % ▲
18 from 1 measurement
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
98 +20 % ▲
17 −17 %
durability (wear and abrasion)
59 +11 %
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort 79 ≈ average ▲
26 from 1 measurement
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
57 ≈ average ▲
44 ≈ average
ride comfort
68 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
OE ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Sound ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Suitable for EVs ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
OE* Rim protection* Reinforced profile* Sound* Suitable for EVs* OE* Rim protection* Reinforced profile* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres
7.8 Falken E. ZIEX 
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured 5.4 Nexen N'FERA RU1 noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured Wet 55 +3 % ▲
33 +2 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 5 tests 3 Tests
70 +4 % ▲
42 +2 %
Aquaplaning 5 tests 1 test 1 test
11 −3 %
29 −2 % ▲
wet handling 5 tests 2 Tests
38 ≈ average
39 ≈ average ▲
Dry 84 +5 % ▲
38 −1 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 5 tests 3 Tests
88 +5 % ▲
44 −2 %
dry handling 5 tests 3 Tests
67 +3 % ▲
24 −1 %
Economy 92 +15 % ▲
18 from 1 measurement
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 5 tests 1 test 1 test
98 +20 % ▲
17 −17 %
durability (wear and abrasion) 2 Tests
59 +11 %
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort 79 ≈ average ▲
26 from 1 measurement
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 5 tests 1 test 1 test
57 ≈ average ▲
44 ≈ average
ride comfort
68 Not measured.
– Not measured.