4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO vs Lassa Competus Winter 2+

7.4 Winter
EUROWINTER HS02PRO
Falken
EUROWINTER HS02PRO
SUV / 4×4* Standard
6.4 Winter
Competus Winter 2+
Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
Passenger car* Standard
7.4 EUROWINTER HS02PRO EUROWINTER HS02PRO
6.4 Competus Winter 2+ Competus Winter 2+
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,4
6,4
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Ice Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Snow Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Wet Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Dry Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Economy Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Noise and comfort Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Snow Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Wet Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Dry Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Economy Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better. Unmeasured axes are skipped in the shape: Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO: Ice; Lassa Competus Winter 2+: Ice.

Discipline comparison
Snow
19 −1 % ▲
22 tests
15 ≈ average
3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
15 −2 % ▲
18 tests
10 ≈ average
2 Tests
snow traction
17 −1 %
16 tests
22 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
snow handling
5 −3 %
15 tests
6 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
Wet
61 +3 %
22 tests
76 +5 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
67 +4 %
17 tests
75 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
Aquaplaning
9 −4 %
17 tests
68 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
wet handling
71 +2 % ▲
15 tests
44 ≈ average
2 Tests
Dry
77 +1 % ▲
17 tests
22 −3 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
72 +1 % ▲
15 tests
1 −6 %
2 Tests
dry handling
75 ≈ average
15 tests
85 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
Ice
44 from 1 measurement
1 Test 1 test
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
44 ≈ average
1 Test 1 test
–
Economy
4 −8 % ▲
19 tests
0 −7 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
5 −5 %
18 tests
14 −4 % ▲
2 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
8 −16 % ▲
4 Tests
1 −10 %
1 Test 1 test
Noise and comfort
79 ≈ average ▲
19 tests
2 −2 %
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
51 ≈ average ▲
15 tests
5 −2 %
2 Tests
ride comfort
46 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
OE OE
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* OE OE*
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Ice Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Snow Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Wet Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Dry Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Economy Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO – Noise and comfort Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Snow Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Wet Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Dry Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Economy Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better. Unmeasured axes are skipped in the shape: Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO: Ice; Lassa Competus Winter 2+: Ice.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 172 winter tyres

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO from 55 measurements · 22 tests
beats 27 of 148
19 −1,4 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 6 measurements · 3 tests
beats 22 of 148
15 ≈ average

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 18 tests
beats 21 of 147
15 −1,6 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 14 of 147
10 ≈ average

snow traction

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 16 tests
beats 19 of 117
17 −1,0 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 25 of 117
22 ≈ average

snow handling

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 15 tests
beats 5 of 122
5 −2,6 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 7 of 122
6 −1,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO from 72 measurements · 22 tests
beats 105 of 172
61 +2,8 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 9 measurements · 3 tests
beats 130 of 172
76 +4,6 %

Lassa Competus Winter 2+ is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 17 tests
beats 114 of 171
67 +3,8 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 128 of 171
75 +4,8 %

Aquaplaning

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 17 tests
beats 12 of 134
9 −4,2 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 91 of 134
68 +2,9 %

wet handling

🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 15 tests
beats 90 of 127
71 +1,8 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 55 of 127
44 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO from 30 measurements · 17 tests
beats 102 of 133
77 +1,0 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 4 measurements · 2 tests
beats 29 of 133
22 −2,6 %

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 15 tests
beats 95 of 133
72 +1,2 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 1 of 133
1 −5,5 %

dry handling

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 15 tests
beats 87 of 117
75 ≈ average
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 99 of 117
85 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Ice

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test
beats 31 of 72
44 from 1 measurement
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
– Not measured.
Subcategories ice

ice braking

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 1 test
beats 31 of 72
44 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
– Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO from 24 measurements · 19 tests
beats 5 of 133
4 −8,0 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 3 measurements · 2 tests
beats 0 of 133
0 −7,0 %

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 18 tests
beats 6 of 128
5 −4,6 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 17 of 128
14 −3,5 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 4 tests
beats 7 of 95
8 −16,1 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 1 test
beats 0 of 95
1 −10,1 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO from 15 measurements · 19 tests
beats 101 of 128
79 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only
beats 2 of 128
2 −2,3 %

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 15 tests
beats 64 of 126
51 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 6 of 126
5 −2,3 %

ride comfort

Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO
beats 29 of 64
46 Not measured.
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
– Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.