4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Hankook K137 VENTUS EVO vs Kumho PS71

9.8 Summer
K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
Hankook
235/40R19 96Y HANKOOK K137 VENTUS EVO XL RP
SUV / 4×4 Sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
from 55 793 Ft
7.8 Summer
PS71
Kumho
235/40R19 96Y KUMHO PS71 XL
Passenger car Sport
Rolling resistance D Wet grip A Noise B
from 51 181 Ft
9.8 K137A VENTUS EVO SUV K137A VENTUS EVO SUV from 55 793 Ft
7.8 PS71 PS71 from 51 181 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,8
7,8
Price from
55 793 Ft
51 181 Ft ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Rolling resistance D Wet grip A Noise B
Tyre profiles
Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV – Wet Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV – Dry Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV – Economy Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV – Noise and comfort Kumho PS71 – Wet Kumho PS71 – Dry Kumho PS71 – Economy Kumho PS71 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Wet
99 +7 % ▲
11 tests
88 +5 %
16 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +14 % ▲
8 tests
94 +10 %
11 tests
Aquaplaning
73 +3 %
6 tests
93 +3 % ▲
11 tests
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
5 tests
89 +2 %
9 tests
Dry
97 +4 % ▲
11 tests
61 +2 %
15 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
8 tests
78 +4 %
10 tests
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
9 tests
58 ≈ average
9 tests
Economy
66 +2 % ▲
5 tests
22 −11 %
10 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
40 −5 % ▲
5 tests
10 −9 %
9 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
82 +12 % ▲
2 Tests
23 −12 %
6 tests
Noise and comfort
96 ≈ average ▲
8 tests
18 −2 %
10 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
90 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
0 −2 %
10 tests
ride comfort
85 Not measured. ▲
38 Not measured.
Technologies
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ this one only
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Rim protection Rim protection
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV – Wet Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV – Dry Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV – Economy Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV – Noise and comfort Kumho PS71 – Wet Kumho PS71 – Dry Kumho PS71 – Economy Kumho PS71 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 235/40 R19 among 66 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV from 30 measurements · 11 tests
beats 78 of 79
99 +7,0 %
Kumho PS71 from 40 measurements · 16 tests
beats 69 of 79
88 +5,0 %

Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 8 tests
beats 78 of 79
99 +13,6 %
Kumho PS71 11 tests
beats 66 of 79
94 +9,9 %

Aquaplaning

Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 6 tests
beats 49 of 70
73 +3,4 %
🏆 Kumho PS71 11 tests
beats 65 of 70
93 +3,4 %

wet handling

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 5 tests
beats 68 of 70
99 +4,4 %
Kumho PS71 9 tests
beats 54 of 70
89 +2,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV from 18 measurements · 11 tests
beats 76 of 79
97 +3,8 %
Kumho PS71 from 19 measurements · 15 tests
beats 48 of 79
61 +1,6 %

Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 8 tests
beats 75 of 79
97 +6,3 %
Kumho PS71 10 tests
beats 45 of 79
78 +3,6 %

dry handling

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 9 tests
beats 67 of 69
99 +2,1 %
Kumho PS71 9 tests
beats 30 of 69
58 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV from 8 measurements · 5 tests
beats 47 of 72
66 +2,3 %
Kumho PS71 from 16 measurements · 10 tests
beats 15 of 72
22 −11,4 %

Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 5 tests
beats 31 of 72
40 −4,9 %
Kumho PS71 9 tests
beats 9 of 72
10 −9,0 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 2 tests
beats 41 of 53
82 +11,8 %
Kumho PS71 6 tests
beats 14 of 53
23 −11,8 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV from 7 measurements · 8 tests
beats 67 of 70
96 ≈ average
Kumho PS71 from 10 measurements · 10 tests
beats 12 of 70
18 −1,8 %

Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 7 tests
beats 65 of 70
90 ≈ average
Kumho PS71 10 tests
beats 0 of 70
0 −1,8 %

ride comfort

🏆 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
beats 50 of 61
85 Not measured.
Kumho PS71
beats 24 of 61
38 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.