20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Hankook K137 VENTUS EVO vs Michelin PILOT SPORT 4

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,9
9,4
Price from
52 205 Ft ▲ najlacnejšia
–
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Rolling resistance D Wet grip A Noise B
Discipline comparison
Wet
99 +7 % ▲
11 tests
98 +7 %
23 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
8 tests
98 +12 %
21 tests
Aquaplaning
69 +3 %
6 tests
98 +4 % ▲
17 tests
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
5 tests
90 +3 %
21 tests
Dry
94 +4 % ▲
11 tests
84 +3 %
24 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
8 tests
94 +6 %
22 tests
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
9 tests
89 +1 %
20 tests
Economy
74 +5 %
5 tests
76 +4 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 %
5 tests
47 −2 % ▲
17 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 % ▲
2 Tests
80 +12 %
3 Tests
Noise and comfort
99 ≈ average ▲
8 tests
84 ≈ average
17 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
56 ≈ average
16 tests
ride comfort
83 Not measured.
84 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
ROF ROF
–
✓ iba táto
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
–
✓ iba táto
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile ROF (run-flat technology) ROF Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 255/35 R18 among 50 available

9.9 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
tested in R18
9.4 Michelin PILOT SPORT 4
tested in R18
Wet
99 +7 % ▲
11 tests
98 +7 %
23 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
8 tests
98 +12 %
21 tests
Aquaplaning
69 +3 %
6 tests
98 +4 % ▲
17 tests
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
5 tests
90 +3 %
21 tests
Dry
94 +4 % ▲
11 tests
84 +3 %
24 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
8 tests
94 +6 %
22 tests
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
9 tests
89 +1 %
20 tests
Economy
74 +5 %
5 tests
76 +4 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 %
5 tests
47 −2 % ▲
17 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 % ▲
2 Tests
80 +12 %
3 Tests
Noise and comfort
99 ≈ average ▲
8 tests
84 ≈ average
17 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
56 ≈ average
16 tests
ride comfort
83 Not measured.
84 Not measured. ▲