4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Hankook W320 WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 vs Falken EUROWINTER HS02

6.6 Winter
W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV
Hankook
225/60R16 102V HANKOOK W320 WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 ,XL ,3PMSF
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance D Wet grip C Noise B
from 48 150 Ft
7.6 Winter
EUROWINTER HS02
Falken
225/60R16 102V FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02 XL
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance D Wet grip B Noise B
from 45 309 Ft
6.6 W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV from 48 150 Ft
7.6 EUROWINTER HS02 EUROWINTER HS02 from 45 309 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,6
7,6
Price from
48 150 Ft
45 309 Ft ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance D Wet grip C Noise B
Rolling resistance D Wet grip B Noise B
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Snow Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Wet Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Dry Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Economy Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Noise and comfort Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Snow Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Wet Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Dry Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Economy Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
33 ≈ average ▲
5 tests from braking and handling only
20 −3 %
6 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
46 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
11 −4 %
6 tests
snow traction
– Not measured.
19 −3 %
4 Tests
snow handling
28 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
8 −1 %
3 Tests
Wet
44 +2 %
5 tests
63 +5 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
41 +1 %
5 tests
73 +6 % ▲
6 tests
Aquaplaning
51 +4 % ▲
4 Tests
48 +2 %
5 tests
wet handling
24 −1 %
5 tests
50 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
Dry
34 −1 %
5 tests
89 +3 % ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
5 −4 %
5 tests
96 +4 % ▲
5 tests
dry handling
84 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
56 ≈ average
3 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
2 Tests
Economy
24 −5 %
4 Tests
54 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
20 −5 %
4 Tests
41 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
43 −6 %
1 Test 1 test
50 −2 % ▲
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
15 −3 %
4 Tests noise only
72 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
18 −2 %
4 Tests
90 +1 % ▲
5 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
21 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Snow Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Wet Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Dry Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Economy Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV – Noise and comfort Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Snow Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Wet Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Dry Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Economy Falken EUROWINTER HS02 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 225/60 R16 among 22 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

🏆 Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV from 10 measurements · 5 tests from braking and handling only
beats 7 of 23
33 ≈ average
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 from 14 measurements · 6 tests
beats 4 of 23
20 −3,1 %

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

🏆 Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 5 tests
beats 10 of 23
46 ≈ average
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 6 tests
beats 1 of 23
11 −4,1 %

snow traction

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV
– Not measured.
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 4 tests
beats 4 of 20
19 −2,6 %

snow handling

🏆 Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 5 tests
beats 7 of 23
28 ≈ average
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 3 tests
beats 2 of 23
8 −1,2 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV from 14 measurements · 5 tests
beats 11 of 26
44 +2,0 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 from 23 measurements · 6 tests
beats 16 of 26
63 +4,7 %

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 5 tests
beats 12 of 26
41 +1,2 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 6 tests
beats 16 of 26
73 +6,0 %

Aquaplaning

🏆 Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 4 tests
beats 12 of 23
51 +3,8 %
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 5 tests
beats 11 of 23
48 +2,2 %

wet handling

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 5 tests
beats 8 of 23
24 −1,0 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 3 tests
beats 14 of 23
50 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV from 10 measurements · 5 tests
beats 7 of 22
34 −1,4 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 from 8 measurements · 5 tests
beats 19 of 22
89 +3,1 %

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 5 tests
beats 0 of 22
5 −3,6 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 5 tests
beats 20 of 22
96 +4,2 %

dry handling

🏆 Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 5 tests
beats 19 of 22
84 ≈ average
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 3 tests
beats 13 of 22
56 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV from 5 measurements · 4 tests
beats 5 of 23
24 −4,5 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 from 9 measurements · 5 tests
beats 12 of 23
54 ≈ average

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 4 tests
beats 3 of 23
20 −4,9 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 5 tests
beats 6 of 23
41 ≈ average

durability (wear and abrasion)

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 1 test
beats 7 of 18
43 −5,5 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 2 tests
beats 11 of 18
50 −1,8 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV from 4 measurements · 4 tests noise only
beats 3 of 23
15 −2,6 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 from 5 measurements · 5 tests
beats 16 of 23
72 ≈ average

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV 4 tests
beats 3 of 22
18 −2,0 %
🏆 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 5 tests
beats 18 of 22
90 +1,0 %

ride comfort

Hankook W320A WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 SUV
– Not measured.
Falken EUROWINTER HS02
beats 5 of 15
21 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.