20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Hankook W330 WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 vs Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE 3

8.7 Winter
W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X
Hankook
295/35R20 105W HANKOOK W330 WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 ,XL ,RP ,3PMSF
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 87 556 Ft
9.6 Winter
ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE 3
Goodyear
295/35R20 105W GOODYEAR ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE 3 ,XL ,RP ,3PMSF
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise A
from 129 499 Ft
8.7 W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X from 87 556 Ft
9.6 ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE 3 ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE 3 from 129 499 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,7
9,6
Price from
87 556 Ft ▲ najlacnejšia
129 499 Ft
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise A
Discipline comparison
Snow
65 ≈ average
21 tests
85 +2 % ▲
36 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
83 +3 %
19 tests
89 +4 % ▲
32 tests
snow traction
74 +2 %
17 tests
92 +4 % ▲
29 tests
snow handling
81 +2 %
16 tests
94 +3 % ▲
24 tests
Wet
50 +3 %
21 tests
77 +3 % ▲
35 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
88 +8 %
18 tests
91 +9 % ▲
30 tests
Aquaplaning
94 +9 % ▲
17 tests
89 +6 %
31 tests
wet handling
78 +2 %
17 tests
96 +4 % ▲
24 tests
Dry
35 ≈ average
17 tests
65 ≈ average ▲
30 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
78 +2 %
17 tests
91 +3 % ▲
30 tests
dry handling
68 ≈ average
16 tests
81 ≈ average ▲
19 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
2 Tests
– Not measured.
6 tests
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
20 +1 %
‹
2 Tests
27 −3 % ▲
6 tests
ice traction
50 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
20 −7 %
‹
1 test 1 test
Economy
45 −1 %
17 tests
85 +5 % ▲
31 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
39 ≈ average
17 tests
47 +3 % ▲
30 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
81 +12 %
5 tests
94 +22 % ▲
10 tests
Noise and comfort
45 −2 %
17 tests
95 ≈ average ▲
27 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
3 −1 %
‹
16 tests
96 +1 % ▲
23 tests
ride comfort
40 Not measured.
‹
64 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
–
✓ iba táto
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 295/35 R20 among 8 available

8.7 Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X
tested only in R17, R18, R19
9.6 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE 3
tested in R20
Snow
65 ≈ average
21 tests
85 +2 % ▲
36 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
83 +3 %
19 tests
89 +4 % ▲
32 tests
snow traction
74 +2 %
17 tests
92 +4 % ▲
29 tests
snow handling
81 +2 %
16 tests
94 +3 % ▲
24 tests
Wet
50 +3 %
21 tests
77 +3 % ▲
35 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
88 +8 %
18 tests
91 +9 % ▲
30 tests
Aquaplaning
94 +9 % ▲
17 tests
89 +6 %
31 tests
wet handling
78 +2 %
17 tests
96 +4 % ▲
24 tests
Dry
35 ≈ average
17 tests
65 ≈ average ▲
30 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
78 +2 %
17 tests
91 +3 % ▲
30 tests
dry handling
68 ≈ average
16 tests
81 ≈ average ▲
19 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
2 Tests
– Not measured.
6 tests
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
20 +1 %
‹
2 Tests
27 −3 % ▲
6 tests
ice traction
50 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
20 −7 %
‹
1 test 1 test
Economy
45 −1 %
17 tests
85 +5 % ▲
31 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
39 ≈ average
17 tests
47 +3 % ▲
30 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
81 +12 %
5 tests
94 +22 % ▲
10 tests
Noise and comfort
45 −2 %
17 tests
95 ≈ average ▲
27 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
3 −1 %
‹
16 tests
96 +1 % ▲
23 tests
ride comfort
40 Not measured.
‹
64 Not measured. ▲