20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Hankook W330 WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 vs Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5

8.7 Winter
W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X
Hankook
275/35R20 102W HANKOOK W330 WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 ,XL ,RP ,3PMSF
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 93 231 Ft
10 Winter
PILOT ALPIN 5
Michelin
275/35R20 104V Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 XL MO1 A
Passenger car Sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
8.7 W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X from 93 231 Ft
10 PILOT ALPIN 5 PILOT ALPIN 5
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,7
10,0
Price from
93 231 Ft ▲ najlacnejšia
–
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
Discipline comparison
Snow
74 +2 %
21 tests
98 +4 % ▲
25 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
83 +3 %
19 tests
100 +6 % ▲
17 tests
snow traction
74 +2 %
17 tests
95 +5 % ▲
16 tests
snow handling
81 +2 %
16 tests
96 +4 % ▲
20 tests
Wet
60 +5 %
21 tests
69 +4 % ▲
24 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
88 +8 %
18 tests
94 +9 % ▲
17 tests
Aquaplaning
94 +9 % ▲
17 tests
76 +5 %
17 tests
wet handling
78 +2 %
17 tests
86 +2 % ▲
20 tests
Dry
55 ≈ average
17 tests
93 +2 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
78 +2 %
17 tests
98 +5 % ▲
16 tests
dry handling
68 ≈ average
16 tests
98 +2 % ▲
13 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
2 Tests
– Not measured.
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
20 +1 %
2 Tests
79 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
ice traction
50 +4 %
1 test 1 test
91 +7 % ▲
1 test 1 test
Economy
58 +1 %
17 tests
82 +7 % ▲
19 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
39 ≈ average
17 tests
65 +2 % ▲
17 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
81 +12 %
5 tests
91 +21 % ▲
5 tests
Noise and comfort
28 −2 %
17 tests
72 +1 % ▲
17 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
3 −1 %
‹
16 tests
98 +2 % ▲
13 tests
ride comfort
40 Not measured.
63 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
OE OE
–
✓ iba táto
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Rim protection Rim protection
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Reinforced profile Reinforced profile OE OE
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 275/35 R20 among 18 available

8.7 Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X
tested only in R17, R18, R19
10 Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
tested only in R18, R19
Snow
74 +2 %
21 tests
98 +4 % ▲
25 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
83 +3 %
19 tests
100 +6 % ▲
17 tests
snow traction
74 +2 %
17 tests
95 +5 % ▲
16 tests
snow handling
81 +2 %
16 tests
96 +4 % ▲
20 tests
Wet
60 +5 %
21 tests
69 +4 % ▲
24 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
88 +8 %
18 tests
94 +9 % ▲
17 tests
Aquaplaning
94 +9 % ▲
17 tests
76 +5 %
17 tests
wet handling
78 +2 %
17 tests
86 +2 % ▲
20 tests
Dry
55 ≈ average
17 tests
93 +2 % ▲
18 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
78 +2 %
17 tests
98 +5 % ▲
16 tests
dry handling
68 ≈ average
16 tests
98 +2 % ▲
13 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
2 Tests
– Not measured.
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
20 +1 %
2 Tests
79 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
ice traction
50 +4 %
1 test 1 test
91 +7 % ▲
1 test 1 test
Economy
58 +1 %
17 tests
82 +7 % ▲
19 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
39 ≈ average
17 tests
65 +2 % ▲
17 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
81 +12 %
5 tests
91 +21 % ▲
5 tests
Noise and comfort
28 −2 %
17 tests
72 +1 % ▲
17 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
3 −1 %
‹
16 tests
98 +2 % ▲
13 tests
ride comfort
40 Not measured.
63 Not measured. ▲