20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Hankook W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV vs Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52

8.6 Winter
W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV
Hankook
W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV
SUV / 4×4* Standard
8.0 Winter
WINTERCRAFT WP52
Kumho
WINTERCRAFT WP52
Passenger car Standard
8.6 W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV
8.0 WINTERCRAFT WP52 WINTERCRAFT WP52
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,6
8,0
Discipline comparison
Snow
74 +3 % ▲
1 test 1 test
40 ≈ average
11 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
76 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
32 ≈ average
9 tests
snow traction
62 +3 % ▲
1 test 1 test
27 ≈ average
6 tests
snow handling
70 +2 % ▲
1 test 1 test
54 ≈ average
5 tests
Wet
99 +16 % ▲
1 test 1 test
77 +3 %
11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
96 +12 % ▲
1 test 1 test
82 +6 %
9 tests
Aquaplaning
97 +25 % ▲
1 test 1 test
16 −6 %
6 tests weakness
wet handling
95 +5 % ▲
1 test 1 test
61 ≈ average
5 tests
Dry
98 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
94 +3 %
6 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
86 +3 %
1 test 1 test
95 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
99 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
84 ≈ average
4 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
71 +2 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
– Not measured.
72 +2 %
2 Tests
Economy
46 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
49 +4 % ▲
7 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
42 −7 % ▲
1 test 1 test
7 −3 %
5 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
62 +7 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
67 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test noise only
35 ≈ average
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
63 ≈ average
4 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
13 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
–
M+S M+S
✓
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* Rim protection Rim protection*
none

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres

8.6 Hankook W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV
provisional PTI
8.0 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Snow
74 +3 % ▲
1 test 1 test
40 ≈ average
11 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
76 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
32 ≈ average
9 tests
snow traction
62 +3 % ▲
1 test 1 test
27 ≈ average
6 tests
snow handling
70 +2 % ▲
1 test 1 test
54 ≈ average
5 tests
Wet
99 +16 % ▲
1 test 1 test
77 +3 %
11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
96 +12 % ▲
1 test 1 test
82 +6 %
9 tests
Aquaplaning
97 +25 % ▲
1 test 1 test
16 −6 %
6 tests weakness
wet handling
95 +5 % ▲
1 test 1 test
61 ≈ average
5 tests
Dry
98 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
94 +3 %
6 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
86 +3 %
1 test 1 test
95 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
99 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
84 ≈ average
4 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
71 +2 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
– Not measured.
72 +2 %
2 Tests
Economy
46 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
49 +4 % ▲
7 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
42 −7 % ▲
1 test 1 test
7 −3 %
5 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
62 +7 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
67 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test noise only
35 ≈ average
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
63 ≈ average
4 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
13 Not measured.