Comparison Imperial SnowDragon UHP vs Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE +
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,6
8,7
Discipline comparison
Snow 10 −3 %
94 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
9 −4 %
92 +3 % ▲
snow traction
2 −3 %
97 +6 % ▲
snow handling
18 −3 %
92 +2 % ▲
Wet 12 −7 %
90 +7 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
12 −7 %
87 +7 % ▲
Aquaplaning
14 −2 %
86 +7 % ▲
wet handling
1 −18 %
88 +2 % ▲
Dry 37 ≈ average
51 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
25 −1 %
53 ≈ average ▲
dry handling
89 +2 % ▲
39 ≈ average
Ice 14 from 1 measurement
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
13 −4 %
– Not measured.
Economy 80 +7 % ▲
78 +4 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
27 +1 %
74 +4 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
82 +9 % ▲
70 +3 %
Noise and comfort 77 ≈ average
86 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
67 ≈ average ▲
18 ≈ average
ride comfort
58 Not measured.
91 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
3PMSF ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S ✓
✓ Only in some sizes
3D sipes –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
OE –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Rim protection –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
ROF –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Seal –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Sound –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Suitable for EVs –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Reinforced profile –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
3PMSF* M+S 3PMSF* M+S* 3D sipes* OE* Rim protection* ROF* Seal* Sound* Suitable for EVs* Reinforced profile* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres
5.6 Imperial SnowDragon UHP 
PTI reduced by 0,2 – wet −7,1 %
PTI reduced by 0,2 – wet −7,1 % 8.7 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + 
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured Snow 10 −3 %
94 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 2 Tests 8 tests
9 −4 %
92 +3 % ▲
snow traction 2 Tests 4 Tests
2 −3 %
97 +6 % ▲
snow handling 1 test 1 test 8 tests
18 −3 %
92 +2 % ▲
Wet 12 −7 %
90 +7 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 4 Tests 8 tests
12 −7 %
87 +7 % ▲
Aquaplaning 2 Tests 7 tests
14 −2 %
86 +7 % ▲
wet handling 2 Tests 8 tests
1 −18 %
88 +2 % ▲
Dry 37 ≈ average
51 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 2 Tests 7 tests
25 −1 %
53 ≈ average ▲
dry handling 1 test 1 test 7 tests
89 +2 % ▲
39 ≈ average
Ice 14 from 1 measurement
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking 1 test 1 test
13 −4 %
– Not measured.
Economy 80 +7 % ▲
78 +4 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 2 Tests 8 tests
27 +1 %
74 +4 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 1 test 1 test 4 Tests
82 +9 % ▲
70 +3 %
Noise and comfort 77 ≈ average
86 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 2 Tests 7 tests
67 ≈ average ▲
18 ≈ average
ride comfort
58 Not measured.
91 Not measured. ▲