Comparison Kumho HS51 vs Kumho ECSTA HS52
7.0 
HS51
HS51 8.0 
ECSTA HS52
ECSTA HS52 Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,0
8,0
Discipline comparison
Wet 84 +3 % ▲
79 +6 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
76 +1 %
93 +10 % ▲
Aquaplaning
96 +5 % ▲
22 −2 %
wet handling
64 ≈ average ▲
62 +1 %
Dry 66 ≈ average
88 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
70 ≈ average
87 +4 % ▲
dry handling
50 ≈ average
86 ≈ average ▲
Economy 59 +7 %
68 +9 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
6 −5 %
18 −1 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
69 +9 %
77 +13 % ▲
Noise and comfort 22 ≈ average
30 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
30 ≈ average
47 ≈ average ▲
ride comfort
– Not measured.
3 Not measured.
Technologies
Reinforced profile ✓ Only in some sizes
–
OE ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Rim protection ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
Reinforced profile* OE* Rim protection* none
* Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres
7.0 Kumho HS51 
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured 8.0 Kumho ECSTA HS52 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured Wet 84 +3 % ▲
79 +6 %
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 3 Tests 6 tests
76 +1 %
93 +10 % ▲
Aquaplaning 2 Tests 6 tests
96 +5 % ▲
22 −2 %
wet handling 3 Tests 3 Tests
64 ≈ average ▲
62 +1 %
Dry 66 ≈ average
88 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 3 Tests 6 tests
70 ≈ average
87 +4 % ▲
dry handling 3 Tests 3 Tests
50 ≈ average
86 ≈ average ▲
Economy 59 +7 %
68 +9 % ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 2 Tests 6 tests
6 −5 %
18 −1 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 4 Tests 5 tests
69 +9 %
77 +13 % ▲
Noise and comfort 22 ≈ average
30 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 2 Tests 5 tests
30 ≈ average
47 ≈ average ▲
ride comfort
– Not measured.
3 Not measured.