20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kumho HS51 vs Kumho HS52

7.0 Summer
HS51
Kumho
215/45R16 86H KUMHO HS51
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 37 185 Ft
8.0 Summer
ECSTA HS52
Kumho
215/45R16 90V KUMHO HS52 XL
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
from 36 245 Ft
7.0 HS51 HS51 from 37 185 Ft
8.0 ECSTA HS52 ECSTA HS52 from 36 245 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,0
8,0
Price from
37 185 Ft
36 245 Ft ▲ najlacnejšia
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Discipline comparison
Wet
90 +1 % ▲
4 Tests
81 +4 %
8 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
76 +1 %
3 Tests
93 +10 % ▲
6 tests
Aquaplaning
96 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
22 −2 %
6 tests
wet handling
64 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
62 +1 %
3 Tests
Dry
72 ≈ average
4 Tests
94 +3 % ▲
8 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
70 ≈ average
3 Tests
87 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
50 ≈ average
3 Tests
86 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
Economy
50 +5 %
5 tests
65 +7 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
6 −5 %
‹
2 Tests
18 −1 % ▲
6 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
69 +9 %
4 Tests
77 +13 % ▲
5 tests
Noise and comfort
15 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
24 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
30 ≈ average
2 Tests
47 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
3 Not measured.
Technologies
OE OE
✓ iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

OE OE
none
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 215/45 R16 among 34 available

7.0 Kumho HS51
tested in R16
8.0 Kumho ECSTA HS52
tested in R16
Wet
90 +1 % ▲
4 Tests
81 +4 %
8 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
76 +1 %
3 Tests
93 +10 % ▲
6 tests
Aquaplaning
96 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
22 −2 %
6 tests
wet handling
64 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
62 +1 %
3 Tests
Dry
72 ≈ average
4 Tests
94 +3 % ▲
8 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
70 ≈ average
3 Tests
87 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
50 ≈ average
3 Tests
86 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
Economy
50 +5 %
5 tests
65 +7 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
6 −5 %
‹
2 Tests
18 −1 % ▲
6 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
69 +9 %
4 Tests
77 +13 % ▲
5 tests
Noise and comfort
15 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
24 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
30 ≈ average
2 Tests
47 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
3 Not measured.