4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kumho HS51 ECSTA vs Kumho ECSTA HS52

7.0 Summer
HS51
Kumho
205/55R16 91W KUMHO HS51 ECSTA
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance D Wet grip B Noise B
from 50 987 Ft
8.0 Summer
ECSTA HS52
Kumho
205/55R16 91V KUMHO ECSTA HS52
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
from 24 163 Ft
7.0 HS51 HS51 from 50 987 Ft
8.0 ECSTA HS52 ECSTA HS52 from 24 163 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,0
8,0
Price from
50 987 Ft
24 163 Ft ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance D Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise B
Tyre profiles
Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Kumho HS51 – Wet Kumho HS51 – Dry Kumho HS51 – Economy Kumho HS51 – Noise and comfort Kumho ECSTA HS52 – Wet Kumho ECSTA HS52 – Dry Kumho ECSTA HS52 – Economy Kumho ECSTA HS52 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Wet
86 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
83 +6 %
8 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
76 +2 %
3 Tests
93 +10 % ▲
6 tests
Aquaplaning
97 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
23 −2 %
6 tests
wet handling
64 ≈ average
3 Tests
65 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
Dry
68 +1 %
4 Tests
91 +4 % ▲
8 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
69 ≈ average
3 Tests
87 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
49 ≈ average
3 Tests
85 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
Economy
51 +4 %
5 tests
59 +6 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
6 −5 %
2 Tests
18 −1 % ▲
6 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
69 +9 %
4 Tests
76 +13 % ▲
5 tests
Noise and comfort
14 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
30 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
32 ≈ average
2 Tests
48 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
3 Not measured.
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Kumho HS51 – Wet Kumho HS51 – Dry Kumho HS51 – Economy Kumho HS51 – Noise and comfort Kumho ECSTA HS52 – Wet Kumho ECSTA HS52 – Dry Kumho ECSTA HS52 – Economy Kumho ECSTA HS52 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 205/55 R16 among 73 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

🏆 Kumho HS51 from 8 measurements · 4 tests
beats 90 of 105
86 +3,0 %
Kumho ECSTA HS52 from 27 measurements · 8 tests
beats 87 of 105
83 +6,1 %

Kumho HS51 is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Kumho HS51 3 tests
beats 78 of 105
76 +1,5 %
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 6 tests
beats 99 of 105
93 +9,8 %

Aquaplaning

🏆 Kumho HS51 2 tests
beats 79 of 83
97 +4,7 %
Kumho ECSTA HS52 6 tests
beats 21 of 83
23 −2,1 %

wet handling

Kumho HS51 3 tests
beats 47 of 74
64 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 3 tests
beats 49 of 74
65 +1,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Kumho HS51 from 6 measurements · 4 tests
beats 71 of 105
68 +1,0 %
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 from 9 measurements · 8 tests
beats 95 of 105
91 +3,5 %

Kumho ECSTA HS52 is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Kumho HS51 3 tests
beats 73 of 105
69 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 6 tests
beats 95 of 105
87 +3,7 %

dry handling

Kumho HS51 3 tests
beats 38 of 74
49 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 3 tests
beats 64 of 74
85 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Kumho HS51 from 6 measurements · 5 tests
beats 43 of 86
51 +4,1 %
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 from 14 measurements · 6 tests
beats 50 of 86
59 +6,0 %

Kumho ECSTA HS52 is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Kumho HS51 2 tests
beats 2 of 85
6 −4,6 %
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 6 tests
beats 12 of 85
18 −1,3 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Kumho HS51 4 tests
beats 44 of 67
69 +8,5 %
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 5 tests
beats 50 of 67
76 +12,9 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Kumho HS51 from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only
beats 11 of 81
14 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 from 5 measurements · 5 tests
beats 24 of 81
30 ≈ average

Kumho ECSTA HS52 is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Kumho HS51 2 tests
beats 26 of 81
32 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho ECSTA HS52 5 tests
beats 37 of 81
48 ≈ average

ride comfort

Kumho HS51
– Not measured.
Kumho ECSTA HS52
beats 0 of 54
3 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.