4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ vs Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER

8.3 Winter
WINTERCRAFT WP52+
Kumho
205/60R16 96H KUMHO WINTERCRAFT WP52+ ,XL ,3PMSF
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 31 243 Ft
7.3 Winter
DISCOVERER WINTER
Cooper
205/60R16 96H COOPER DISCOVERER WINTER XL
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
from 39 028 Ft
8.3 WINTERCRAFT WP52+ WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 31 243 Ft
7.3 DISCOVERER WINTER DISCOVERER WINTER from 39 028 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,3
7,3
Price from
31 243 Ft ▲ cheapest
39 028 Ft
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Snow Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Wet Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Dry Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Economy Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Noise and comfort Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Snow Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Wet Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Dry Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Economy Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
67 +2 % ▲
7 tests
55 +1 %
4 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
59 +3 %
4 Tests
62 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
snow traction
81 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
54 ≈ average
3 Tests
snow handling
73 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
63 +2 %
3 Tests
Wet
85 +6 % ▲
7 tests
77 +4 %
4 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
96 +11 % ▲
4 Tests
83 +4 %
4 Tests
Aquaplaning
31 −1 %
4 Tests
78 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
81 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
40 ≈ average
3 Tests
Dry
84 +2 % ▲
5 tests
27 ≈ average
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
98 +5 % ▲
4 Tests
50 +2 %
3 Tests
dry handling
41 −2 % ▲
3 Tests
14 ≈ average
3 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
1 Test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
43 +3 % ▲
5 tests
14 −7 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
47 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
12 −6 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
47 +7 % ▲
4 Tests
33 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
Noise and comfort
14 ≈ average
5 tests
54 +2 % ▲
3 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
23 ≈ average
4 Tests
85 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
ride comfort
10 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
–
M+S M+S
✓
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
–
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
✓ this one only
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
none
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Snow Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Wet Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Dry Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Economy Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Noise and comfort Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Snow Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Wet Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Dry Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Economy Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 205/60 R16 among 55 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 12 measurements · 7 tests
beats 44 of 66
67 +2,0 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER from 12 measurements · 4 tests
beats 36 of 66
55 +1,4 %

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 34 of 66
59 +2,6 %
🏆 Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 3 tests
beats 37 of 66
62 +1,2 %

snow traction

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 42 of 56
81 +2,6 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 3 tests
beats 27 of 56
54 ≈ average

snow handling

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 3 tests
beats 40 of 57
73 +1,4 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 3 tests
beats 31 of 57
63 +2,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 17 measurements · 7 tests
beats 63 of 75
85 +5,8 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER from 15 measurements · 4 tests
beats 57 of 75
77 +4,1 %

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 72 of 75
96 +11,0 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 4 tests
beats 58 of 75
83 +3,6 %

Aquaplaning

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 19 of 62
31 −1,0 %
🏆 Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 3 tests
beats 44 of 62
78 +6,1 %

wet handling

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 3 tests
beats 46 of 58
81 +1,8 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 3 tests
beats 23 of 58
40 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 7 measurements · 5 tests
beats 51 of 61
84 +2,3 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER from 6 measurements · 3 tests
beats 16 of 61
27 ≈ average

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 58 of 61
98 +4,9 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 3 tests
beats 31 of 61
50 +1,7 %

dry handling

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 3 tests
beats 22 of 56
41 −1,9 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 3 tests
beats 6 of 56
14 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 10 measurements · 5 tests
beats 26 of 61
43 +3,1 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER from 5 measurements · 3 tests
beats 8 of 61
14 −6,9 %

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 21 of 59
47 ≈ average
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 3 tests
beats 6 of 59
12 −5,5 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 24 of 54
47 +7,4 %
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 1 test
beats 15 of 54
33 −4,0 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 4 measurements · 5 tests
beats 8 of 60
14 ≈ average
🏆 Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER from 3 measurements · 3 tests noise only
beats 31 of 60
54 +1,7 %

Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 16 of 59
23 ≈ average
🏆 Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 3 tests
beats 49 of 59
85 +1,8 %

ride comfort

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+
beats 4 of 37
10 Not measured.
Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER
– Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.