4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 vs Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+

7.8 WINTERCRAFT WP52 WINTERCRAFT WP52 from 47 756 Ft
8.3 WINTERCRAFT WP52+ WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 39 246 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,8
8,3
Price from
47 756 Ft
39 246 Ft ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Snow Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Wet Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Dry Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Economy Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Noise and comfort Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Snow Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Wet Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Dry Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Economy Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
32 ≈ average
10 tests
65 +3 % ▲
7 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
30 ≈ average
8 tests
59 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
snow traction
28 ≈ average
6 tests
81 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
snow handling
55 ≈ average
5 tests
73 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
Wet
68 +3 %
10 tests
85 +7 % ▲
7 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
77 +5 %
8 tests
96 +11 % ▲
4 Tests
Aquaplaning
16 −6 %
6 tests weakness
31 −1 % ▲
4 Tests
wet handling
64 ≈ average
5 tests
81 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
Dry
93 +2 % ▲
6 tests
76 +2 %
5 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
93 +4 %
6 tests
98 +5 % ▲
4 Tests
dry handling
87 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
41 −2 %
3 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
2 Tests
– Not measured.
1 Test 1 test
Economy
41 +1 %
7 tests
47 +3 % ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
7 −3 %
5 tests
47 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
63 +7 % ▲
4 Tests
47 +7 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
33 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
17 ≈ average
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
60 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
23 ≈ average
4 Tests
ride comfort
12 Not measured. ▲
10 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
–
✓
M+S M+S
–
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
–
✓
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
–
✓ this one only
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

none
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Snow Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Wet Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Dry Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Economy Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 – Noise and comfort Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Snow Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Wet Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Dry Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Economy Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 205/55 R17 among 46 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 from 21 measurements · 10 tests
beats 17 of 55
32 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 12 measurements · 7 tests
beats 35 of 55
65 +2,8 %

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 8 tests
beats 15 of 55
30 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 27 of 55
59 +2,6 %

snow traction

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 6 tests
beats 13 of 46
28 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 34 of 46
81 +2,6 %

snow handling

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 5 tests
beats 23 of 47
55 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 3 tests
beats 32 of 47
73 +1,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 from 27 measurements · 10 tests
beats 43 of 64
68 +2,7 %
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 17 measurements · 7 tests
beats 54 of 64
85 +6,6 %

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 8 tests
beats 44 of 64
77 +5,2 %
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 60 of 64
96 +11,0 %

Aquaplaning

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 6 tests
beats 8 of 49
16 −5,6 %
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 15 of 49
31 −1,0 %

wet handling

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 5 tests
beats 32 of 48
64 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 3 tests
beats 37 of 48
81 +1,8 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 from 10 measurements · 6 tests
beats 44 of 48
93 +2,4 %
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 7 measurements · 5 tests
beats 36 of 48
76 +2,0 %

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 6 tests
beats 41 of 48
93 +3,7 %
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 46 of 48
98 +4,9 %

dry handling

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 4 tests
beats 38 of 46
87 ≈ average
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 3 tests
beats 18 of 46
41 −1,9 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 from 11 measurements · 7 tests
beats 19 of 48
41 +1,2 %
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 10 measurements · 5 tests
beats 22 of 48
47 +3,4 %

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 5 tests
beats 6 of 48
7 −3,0 %
🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 21 of 48
47 ≈ average

durability (wear and abrasion)

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 4 tests
beats 29 of 43
63 +7,0 %
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 17 of 43
47 +7,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 from 4 measurements · 5 tests
beats 15 of 49
33 ≈ average
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ from 4 measurements · 5 tests
beats 8 of 49
17 ≈ average

Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 4 tests
beats 26 of 48
60 ≈ average
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 4 tests
beats 14 of 48
23 ≈ average

ride comfort

🏆 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52
beats 5 of 32
12 Not measured.
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+
beats 4 of 32
10 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.