Comparison Minerva ALL SEASON MASTER vs Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32
7.0 
SOLUS 4S HA32
SOLUS 4S HA32 Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,5
7,0
Discipline comparison
Snow 30 −1 %
56 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
73 +2 % ▲
72 +3 %
snow traction
2 −4 %
15 −5 % ▲
snow handling
2 −3 %
46 ≈ average ▲
Wet 21 −7 %
57 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
26 −8 %
60 +3 % ▲
Aquaplaning
2 −13 %
37 −1 % ▲
wet handling
14 −6 %
43 ≈ average ▲
Dry 16 −3 %
46 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
19 −4 %
48 −2 % ▲
dry handling
15 ≈ average
47 ≈ average ▲
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy 1 −12 %
‹
2 Tests bez opotrebenia 47 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
1 −13 %
26 −6 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
61 +5 %
Noise and comfort 67 +3 % ▲
54 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
97 +3 % ▲
70 ≈ average
Technologies
3PMSF ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Reinforced profile –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
3PMSF* M+S* 3PMSF* M+S* Rim protection* Reinforced profile* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 105 all-season tyres
5.5 Minerva ALL SEASON MASTER 
PTI reduced by 0,2 – wet −7,2 %
PTI reduced by 0,2 – wet −7,2 % 7.0 Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32 
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured Snow 30 −1 %
56 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 2 Tests 2 Tests
73 +2 % ▲
72 +3 %
snow traction 2 Tests 1 test 1 test
2 −4 %
15 −5 % ▲
snow handling 2 Tests 2 Tests
2 −3 %
46 ≈ average ▲
Wet 21 −7 %
57 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 5 tests 3 Tests
26 −8 %
60 +3 % ▲
Aquaplaning 2 Tests 2 Tests
2 −13 %
37 −1 % ▲
wet handling 2 Tests 2 Tests
14 −6 %
43 ≈ average ▲
Dry 16 −3 %
46 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 5 tests 3 Tests
19 −4 %
48 −2 % ▲
dry handling 2 Tests 2 Tests
15 ≈ average
47 ≈ average ▲
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy 1 −12 %
‹
2 Tests bez opotrebenia 47 ≈ average ▲
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 2 Tests 2 Tests
1 −13 %
26 −6 % ▲
durability (wear and abrasion) 2 Tests
– Not measured.
61 +5 %
Noise and comfort 67 +3 % ▲
54 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 2 Tests 2 Tests
97 +3 % ▲
70 ≈ average