4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Minerva FROSTRACK UHP vs Lassa Competus Winter 2+

5.6 Winter
FROSTRACK UHP
Minerva
FROSTRACK UHP
SUV / 4×4* Standard
6.4 Winter
Competus Winter 2+
Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
Passenger car* Standard
5.6 FROSTRACK UHP FROSTRACK UHP
6.4 Competus Winter 2+ Competus Winter 2+
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,6
6,4
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Snow Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Wet Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Dry Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Economy Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Noise and comfort Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Snow Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Wet Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Dry Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Economy Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
8 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
15 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
21 −3 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
10 ≈ average
2 Tests
snow traction
9 −6 %
1 Test 1 test
22 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
snow handling
5 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
6 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
Wet
6 −8 %
3 Tests
76 +5 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
7 −7 %
3 Tests
75 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
Aquaplaning
14 −24 %
1 Test 1 test
68 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
wet handling
6 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
44 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
Dry
97 +2 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
22 −3 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
90 +3 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
1 −6 %
2 Tests
dry handling
97 +1 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
85 ≈ average
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy
16 from 1 measurement ▲
1 Test 1 test no wear measurement
0 −7 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
15 −4 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
14 −4 %
2 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
1 −10 %
1 Test 1 test
Noise and comfort
51 from 1 measurement ▲
1 Test 1 test noise only
2 −2 %
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
71 ≈ average ▲
1 Test 1 test
5 −2 %
2 Tests
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Snow Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Wet Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Dry Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Economy Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Noise and comfort Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Snow Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Wet Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Dry Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Economy Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 172 winter tyres

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 3 measurements · 1 test 1 test
beats 12 of 148
8 −3,7 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 6 measurements · 3 tests
beats 22 of 148
15 ≈ average

Lassa Competus Winter 2+ is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 31 of 147
21 −2,7 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 14 of 147
10 ≈ average

snow traction

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 10 of 117
9 −6,3 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 25 of 117
22 ≈ average

snow handling

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 6 of 122
5 −3,8 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 7 of 122
6 −1,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 7 measurements · 3 tests
beats 10 of 172
6 −7,8 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 9 measurements · 3 tests
beats 130 of 172
76 +4,6 %

Lassa Competus Winter 2+ is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 3 tests
beats 12 of 171
7 −6,7 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 128 of 171
75 +4,8 %

Aquaplaning

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 18 of 134
14 −23,9 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 91 of 134
68 +2,9 %

wet handling

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 7 of 127
6 −4,1 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 55 of 127
44 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 2 measurements · 1 test 1 test
beats 128 of 133
97 +2,3 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 4 measurements · 2 tests
beats 29 of 133
22 −2,6 %

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 119 of 133
90 +2,7 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 1 of 133
1 −5,5 %

dry handling

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 113 of 117
97 +1,4 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 99 of 117
85 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test no wear measurement
beats 21 of 133
16 from 1 measurement
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 3 measurements · 2 tests
beats 0 of 133
0 −7,0 %

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 19 of 128
15 −4,2 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 17 of 128
14 −3,5 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP
– Not measured.
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 1 test
beats 0 of 95
1 −10,1 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test noise only
beats 65 of 128
51 from 1 measurement
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only
beats 2 of 128
2 −2,3 %

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 89 of 126
71 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 6 of 126
5 −2,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.