4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Minerva FROSTRACK UHP XL M+S vs Lassa Competus Winter 2

5.6 Winter
FROSTRACK UHP
Minerva
225/55R17 101V Minerva FROSTRACK UHP XL M+S
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
from 36 940 Ft
6.4 Winter
Competus Winter 2+
Lassa
225/55R17 97V LASSA Competus Winter 2
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance E Wet grip C Noise B
5.6 FROSTRACK UHP FROSTRACK UHP from 36 940 Ft
6.4 Competus Winter 2+ Competus Winter 2+
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,6
6,4
Price from
36 940 Ft ▲ cheapest
–
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
Rolling resistance E Wet grip C Noise B
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Snow Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Wet Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Dry Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Economy Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Noise and comfort Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Snow Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Wet Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Dry Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Economy Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
8 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
17 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
21 −3 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
10 ≈ average
2 Tests
snow traction
9 −6 %
1 Test 1 test
22 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
snow handling
5 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
6 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
Wet
3 −8 %
3 Tests
71 +4 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
7 −7 %
3 Tests
75 +5 % ▲
2 Tests
Aquaplaning
14 −24 %
1 Test 1 test
68 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
wet handling
6 −4 %
1 Test 1 test
44 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
Dry
96 +2 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
23 −3 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
90 +3 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
1 −6 %
2 Tests
dry handling
97 +1 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
85 ≈ average
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy
14 from 1 measurement ▲
1 Test 1 test no wear measurement
1 −9 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
15 −4 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
14 −4 %
2 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
1 −10 %
1 Test 1 test
Noise and comfort
47 from 1 measurement ▲
1 Test 1 test noise only
3 −2 %
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
71 ≈ average ▲
1 Test 1 test
5 −2 %
2 Tests
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Snow Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Wet Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Dry Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Economy Minerva FROSTRACK UHP – Noise and comfort Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Snow Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Wet Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Dry Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Economy Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 225/55 R17 among 52 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 3 measurements · 1 test 1 test
beats 5 of 66
8 −3,7 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 6 measurements · 3 tests
beats 11 of 66
17 ≈ average

Lassa Competus Winter 2+ is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 13 of 65
21 −2,7 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 6 of 65
10 ≈ average

snow traction

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 6 of 55
9 −6,3 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 15 of 55
22 ≈ average

snow handling

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 2 of 55
5 −3,8 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 3 of 55
6 −1,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 7 measurements · 3 tests
beats 2 of 73
3 −8,3 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 9 measurements · 3 tests
beats 51 of 73
71 +4,1 %

Lassa Competus Winter 2+ is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 3 tests
beats 4 of 72
7 −6,7 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 48 of 72
75 +4,8 %

Aquaplaning

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 9 of 60
14 −23,9 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 37 of 60
68 +2,9 %

wet handling

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 7 of 56
6 −4,1 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 23 of 56
44 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 2 measurements · 1 test 1 test
beats 55 of 58
96 +2,2 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 4 measurements · 2 tests
beats 13 of 58
23 −2,7 %

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 53 of 58
90 +2,7 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 1 of 58
1 −5,5 %

dry handling

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 51 of 53
97 +1,4 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 41 of 53
85 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test no wear measurement
beats 8 of 60
14 from 1 measurement
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 3 measurements · 2 tests
beats 0 of 60
1 −8,7 %

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 11 of 58
15 −4,2 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 9 of 58
14 −3,5 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP
– Not measured.
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 1 test
beats 0 of 51
1 −10,1 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test noise only
beats 27 of 58
47 from 1 measurement
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only
beats 1 of 58
3 −2,2 %

Minerva FROSTRACK UHP is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Minerva FROSTRACK UHP 1 test
beats 41 of 56
71 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 5 of 56
5 −2,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.