20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Nokian Tyres WR SNOWPROOF P vs Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,1
9,1
Discipline comparison
Snow
38 ≈ average
6 tests
62 +3 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 +1 %
5 tests
77 +3 % ▲
3 Tests
snow traction
5 −1 %
4 Tests
25 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
snow handling
47 ≈ average
4 Tests
65 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
Wet
57 ≈ average
6 tests
97 +11 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
77 +4 %
5 tests
97 +12 % ▲
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
4 −9 %
4 Tests weakness
87 +10 % ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
14 −4 %
5 tests
97 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
Dry
94 +3 %
4 Tests
95 +4 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
93 +4 %
4 Tests
99 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
dry handling
76 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
35 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
Ice
91 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
91 +5 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
75 +7 % ▲
5 tests
53 +7 %
3 Tests bez opotrebenia
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
95 +14 % ▲
4 Tests
51 +4 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
53 ≈ average
2 Tests
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort
91 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
36 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
97 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
57 ≈ average
2 Tests
ride comfort
87 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
ROF ROF
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Sound Sound
–
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF*
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* Sound (noise reduction) Sound*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres

8.1 Nokian Tyres WR SNOWPROOF P
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
9.1 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
Snow
38 ≈ average
6 tests
62 +3 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 +1 %
5 tests
77 +3 % ▲
3 Tests
snow traction
5 −1 %
4 Tests
25 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
snow handling
47 ≈ average
4 Tests
65 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
Wet
57 ≈ average
6 tests
97 +11 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
77 +4 %
5 tests
97 +12 % ▲
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
4 −9 %
4 Tests weakness
87 +10 % ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
14 −4 %
5 tests
97 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
Dry
94 +3 %
4 Tests
95 +4 % ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
93 +4 %
4 Tests
99 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
dry handling
76 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
35 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
Ice
91 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
91 +5 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
75 +7 % ▲
5 tests
53 +7 %
3 Tests bez opotrebenia
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
95 +14 % ▲
4 Tests
51 +4 %
3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
53 ≈ average
2 Tests
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort
91 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
36 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
97 +3 % ▲
4 Tests
57 ≈ average
2 Tests
ride comfort
87 Not measured.
– Not measured.