Comparison Nokian Tyres WR SUV 4 vs Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P
7.4 
WR SUV 4
WR SUV 4 9.1 
SNOWPROOF 3P
SNOWPROOF 3P Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,4
9,1
Discipline comparison
Snow 60 +1 %
62 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
75 +3 %
77 +3 % ▲
snow traction
48 −1 % ▲
25 +1 %
snow handling
55 ≈ average
65 +2 % ▲
Wet 54 +3 %
97 +11 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
63 +6 %
97 +12 % ▲
Aquaplaning
20 −9 %
87 +10 % ▲
wet handling
47 +2 %
97 +6 % ▲
Dry 58 ≈ average
95 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
59 ≈ average
99 +6 % ▲
dry handling
42 ≈ average ▲
35 ≈ average
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy 84 +1 % ▲
53 +7 %
what it consists of Economy (1)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
84 +4 % ▲
51 +4 %
Noise and comfort 48 ≈ average ▲
36 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
59 ≈ average ▲
57 ≈ average
Technologies
3PMSF ✓ Only in some sizes
✓
M+S ✓
✓
Reinforced profile ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
ROF ✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Sound –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
3PMSF* M+S Reinforced profile* ROF* 3PMSF M+S Reinforced profile* Rim protection* Sound* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres
7.4 Nokian Tyres WR SUV 4 
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured 9.1 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured Snow 60 +1 %
62 +3 % ▲
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 3 Tests 3 Tests
75 +3 %
77 +3 % ▲
snow traction 2 Tests 3 Tests
48 −1 % ▲
25 +1 %
snow handling 3 Tests 3 Tests
55 ≈ average
65 +2 % ▲
Wet 54 +3 %
97 +11 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 3 Tests 3 Tests
63 +6 %
97 +12 % ▲
Aquaplaning 3 Tests weakness 3 Tests
20 −9 %
87 +10 % ▲
wet handling 3 Tests 3 Tests
47 +2 %
97 +6 % ▲
Dry 58 ≈ average
95 +4 % ▲
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 3 Tests 3 Tests
59 ≈ average
99 +6 % ▲
dry handling 3 Tests 1 test 1 test
42 ≈ average ▲
35 ≈ average
Ice – Not measured.
– Not measured.
Economy 84 +1 % ▲
53 +7 %
what it consists of Economy (1)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 3 Tests 3 Tests
84 +4 % ▲
51 +4 %
Noise and comfort 48 ≈ average ▲
36 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 3 Tests 2 Tests
59 ≈ average ▲
57 ≈ average