4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Vredestein QUATRAC PRO vs Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+

7.6 All-season
QUATRAC PRO
Vredestein
225/50R17 98Y VREDESTEIN QUATRAC PRO XL FSL
SUV / 4×4 Standard
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 56 360 Ft
7.4 All-season
QUATRAC PRO+
Vredestein
225/50R17 98Y VREDESTEIN QUATRAC PRO+ ,XL ,FSL ,3PMSF
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 46 046 Ft
7.6 QUATRAC PRO QUATRAC PRO from 56 360 Ft
7.4 QUATRAC PRO+ QUATRAC PRO+ from 46 046 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,6
7,4
Price from
56 360 Ft
46 046 Ft ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Snow Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Wet Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Dry Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Economy Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Noise and comfort Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Snow Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Wet Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Dry Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Economy Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
28 −3 % ▲
12 tests
19 −3 %
14 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
25 −4 % ▲
12 tests
13 −3 %
14 tests
snow traction
20 −5 % ▲
8 tests
15 −3 %
14 tests
snow handling
37 −1 % ▲
11 tests
28 ≈ average
13 tests
Wet
85 +5 % ▲
14 tests
80 +5 %
14 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
84 +9 %
12 tests
87 +9 % ▲
14 tests
Aquaplaning
31 −2 % ▲
11 tests
27 ≈ average
14 tests
wet handling
86 +3 % ▲
11 tests
82 +2 %
14 tests
Dry
63 ≈ average ▲
14 tests
42 ≈ average
13 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
55 ≈ average ▲
12 tests
44 ≈ average
14 tests
dry handling
66 ≈ average ▲
11 tests
50 ≈ average
12 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
1 Test 1 test
– Not measured.
2 Tests
Economy
5 −6 %
11 tests
25 −4 % ▲
14 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
6 −5 %
11 tests
23 −5 % ▲
14 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
16 −13 %
2 Tests
31 −3 % ▲
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
81 ≈ average ▲
10 tests
71 ≈ average
13 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
89 ≈ average ▲
10 tests
84 ≈ average
13 tests
ride comfort
50 Not measured.
53 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
–
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
–
M+S M+S
✓ this one only
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile M+S M+S
none
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best ≈ middle of the selected Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Snow Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Wet Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Dry Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Economy Vredestein QUATRAC PRO – Noise and comfort Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Snow Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Wet Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Dry Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Economy Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all all-season tyres · rank in size 225/50 R17 among 49 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO from 35 measurements · 12 tests
beats 14 of 51
28 −3,3 %
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ from 46 measurements · 14 tests
beats 9 of 51
19 −2,9 %

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 12 tests
beats 12 of 51
25 −3,5 %
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 14 tests
beats 7 of 51
13 −3,4 %

snow traction

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 8 tests
beats 10 of 50
20 −4,6 %
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 14 tests
beats 7 of 50
15 −3,3 %

snow handling

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 11 tests
beats 17 of 47
37 −1,2 %
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 13 tests
beats 13 of 47
28 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO from 48 measurements · 14 tests
beats 49 of 58
85 +5,3 %
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ from 59 measurements · 14 tests
beats 46 of 58
80 +5,0 %

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 12 tests
beats 49 of 58
84 +9,1 %
🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 14 tests
beats 51 of 58
87 +9,0 %

Aquaplaning

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 11 tests
beats 17 of 51
31 −1,9 %
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 14 tests
beats 14 of 51
27 ≈ average

wet handling

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 11 tests
beats 39 of 47
86 +3,0 %
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 14 tests
beats 37 of 47
82 +2,1 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO from 23 measurements · 14 tests
beats 36 of 58
63 ≈ average
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ from 26 measurements · 13 tests
beats 24 of 58
42 ≈ average

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 12 tests
beats 29 of 58
55 ≈ average
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 14 tests
beats 21 of 58
44 ≈ average

dry handling

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 11 tests
beats 33 of 47
66 ≈ average
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 12 tests
beats 24 of 47
50 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO from 13 measurements · 11 tests
beats 2 of 50
5 −6,3 %
🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ from 17 measurements · 14 tests
beats 12 of 50
25 −4,3 %

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 11 tests
beats 3 of 50
6 −5,0 %
🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 14 tests
beats 12 of 50
23 −5,2 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2 tests
beats 7 of 38
16 −13,4 %
🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 2 tests
beats 12 of 38
31 −2,6 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO from 10 measurements · 10 tests
beats 40 of 50
81 ≈ average
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ from 13 measurements · 13 tests
beats 35 of 50
71 ≈ average

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 10 tests
beats 41 of 49
89 ≈ average
Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+ 13 tests
beats 38 of 49
84 ≈ average

ride comfort

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO
beats 18 of 34
50 Not measured.
🏆 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO+
beats 19 of 34
53 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.