4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ vs Lassa Competus Winter 2

7.9 Winter
WINTRAC PRO+
Vredestein
225/55R17 101V VREDESTEIN WINTRAC PRO+ ,XL ,FSL ,3PMSF
SUV / 4×4 Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
from 45 018 Ft
6.4 Winter
Competus Winter 2+
Lassa
225/55R17 97V LASSA Competus Winter 2
Passenger car Standard
Rolling resistance E Wet grip C Noise B
7.9 WINTRAC PRO+ WINTRAC PRO+ from 45 018 Ft
6.4 Competus Winter 2+ Competus Winter 2+
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,9
6,4
Price from
45 018 Ft ▲ cheapest
–
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip B Noise B
Rolling resistance E Wet grip C Noise B
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Snow Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Wet Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Dry Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Economy Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Noise and comfort Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Snow Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Wet Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Dry Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Economy Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
66 +2 % ▲
20 tests
17 ≈ average
3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
72 +2 % ▲
18 tests
10 ≈ average
2 Tests
snow traction
70 +1 % ▲
17 tests
22 ≈ average
2 Tests
snow handling
64 ≈ average ▲
14 tests
6 −1 %
2 Tests
Wet
79 +6 % ▲
20 tests
71 +4 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
79 +7 % ▲
17 tests
75 +5 %
2 Tests
Aquaplaning
61 +3 %
17 tests
68 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
wet handling
85 +3 % ▲
14 tests
44 ≈ average
2 Tests
Dry
44 ≈ average ▲
18 tests
23 −3 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
41 ≈ average ▲
17 tests
1 −6 %
2 Tests
dry handling
39 ≈ average
13 tests
85 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
3 Tests
– Not measured.
Economy
4 −11 % ▲
16 tests
1 −9 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
3 −5 %
15 tests
14 −4 % ▲
2 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
5 −15 % ▲
6 tests
1 −10 %
1 Test 1 test
Noise and comfort
65 ≈ average ▲
16 tests
3 −2 %
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
14 ≈ average ▲
15 tests
5 −2 %
2 Tests
ride comfort
35 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ this one only
–
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
✓ this one only
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ this one only
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Snow Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Wet Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Dry Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Economy Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ – Noise and comfort Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Snow Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Wet Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Dry Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Economy Lassa Competus Winter 2+ – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 225/55 R17 among 52 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ from 53 measurements · 20 tests
beats 43 of 66
66 +1,8 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 6 measurements · 3 tests
beats 11 of 66
17 ≈ average

Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 18 tests
beats 43 of 65
72 +2,0 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 6 of 65
10 ≈ average

snow traction

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 17 tests
beats 33 of 55
70 +1,4 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 15 of 55
22 ≈ average

snow handling

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 14 tests
beats 34 of 55
64 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 3 of 55
6 −1,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ from 69 measurements · 20 tests
beats 57 of 73
79 +5,6 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 9 measurements · 3 tests
beats 51 of 73
71 +4,1 %

Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 17 tests
beats 54 of 72
79 +6,7 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 48 of 72
75 +4,8 %

Aquaplaning

Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 17 tests
beats 31 of 60
61 +2,9 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 37 of 60
68 +2,9 %

wet handling

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 14 tests
beats 46 of 56
85 +2,5 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 23 of 56
44 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ from 30 measurements · 18 tests
beats 25 of 58
44 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 4 measurements · 2 tests
beats 13 of 58
23 −2,7 %

Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 17 tests
beats 25 of 58
41 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 1 of 58
1 −5,5 %

dry handling

Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 13 tests
beats 20 of 53
39 ≈ average
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 41 of 53
85 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ from 23 measurements · 16 tests
beats 2 of 60
4 −10,5 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 3 measurements · 2 tests
beats 0 of 60
1 −8,7 %

Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 15 tests
beats 2 of 58
3 −4,6 %
🏆 Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 9 of 58
14 −3,5 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 6 tests
beats 2 of 51
5 −14,9 %
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 1 test
beats 0 of 51
1 −10,1 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ from 15 measurements · 16 tests
beats 37 of 58
65 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only
beats 1 of 58
3 −2,2 %

Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+ 15 tests
beats 13 of 56
14 ≈ average
Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2 tests
beats 5 of 56
5 −2,3 %

ride comfort

Vredestein WINTRAC PRO+
beats 14 of 37
35 Not measured.
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
– Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.