4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 vs Yokohama AE51

6.1 AE51 AE51 from 32 864 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,9
6,1
Price from
–
32 864 Ft ▲ cheapest
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip A Noise 2
Rolling resistance B Wet grip A Noise B
Discipline comparison
Wet
46 +2 %
2 Tests
20 −3 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
57 +4 %
2 Tests
33 −2 %
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
22 −2 %
2 Tests
14 −3 %
2 Tests
wet handling
33 −1 %
2 Tests
15 −3 %
2 Tests
Dry
48 ≈ average
2 Tests
24 −1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
26 −1 %
2 Tests
33 ≈ average
3 Tests
dry handling
69 ≈ average
2 Tests
8 −1 %
1 Test 1 test
Economy
90 +10 %
2 Tests no wear measurement
73 from 1 measurement
1 Test 1 test no wear measurement
what it consists of Economy (1)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
91 +10 %
2 Tests
77 +14 %
1 Test 1 test
Noise and comfort
71 ≈ average
2 Tests
24 ≈ average
2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
63 ≈ average
2 Tests
51 ≈ average
2 Tests
ride comfort
65 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 225/45 R17 among 74 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 from 6 measurements · 2 tests
46 +2,2 %
Yokohama AE51 from 7 measurements · 3 tests
beats 19 of 97
20 −3,2 %
Subcategories wet

wet braking

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
57 +4,2 %
Yokohama AE51 3 tests
beats 23 of 97
33 −1,5 %

Aquaplaning

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
22 −1,9 %
Yokohama AE51 2 tests
beats 11 of 84
14 −3,2 %

wet handling

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
33 −1,3 %
Yokohama AE51 2 tests
beats 13 of 80
15 −2,8 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 from 4 measurements · 2 tests
48 ≈ average
Yokohama AE51 from 4 measurements · 3 tests
beats 23 of 97
24 −1,2 %
Subcategories dry

dry braking

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
26 −1,4 %
Yokohama AE51 3 tests
beats 23 of 97
33 ≈ average

dry handling

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
69 ≈ average
Yokohama AE51 1 test
beats 8 of 80
8 −1,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 from 2 measurements · 2 tests no wear measurement
90 +10,4 %
Yokohama AE51 from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test no wear measurement
beats 62 of 86
73 from 1 measurement
Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
91 +10,1 %
Yokohama AE51 1 test
beats 64 of 86
77 +14,0 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 from 2 measurements · 2 tests
71 ≈ average
Yokohama AE51 from 2 measurements · 2 tests noise only
beats 19 of 81
24 ≈ average
Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50 2 tests
63 ≈ average
Yokohama AE51 2 tests
beats 44 of 81
51 ≈ average

ride comfort

Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE50
65 Not measured.
Yokohama AE51
– Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.