4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Yokohama BLUEARTH-WINTER V905 vs Yokohama V906

6.9 Winter
BLUEARTH*WINTER V905
Yokohama
205/50R17 93H YOKOHAMA BLUEARTH-WINTER V905 XL RPB
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
from 39 771 Ft
7.4 Winter
V906
Yokohama
205/50R17 93V YOKOHAMA V906 ,XL/RF ,RPB ,3PMSF
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance D Wet grip B Noise B
from 40 775 Ft
6.9 BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 from 39 771 Ft
7.4 V906 V906 from 40 775 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,9
7,4
Price from
39 771 Ft ▲ cheapest
40 775 Ft
EU label
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
Rolling resistance D Wet grip B Noise B
Tyre profiles
Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Snow Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Wet Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Dry Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Economy Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Noise and comfort Yokohama V906 – Snow Yokohama V906 – Wet Yokohama V906 – Dry Yokohama V906 – Economy Yokohama V906 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Snow
24 −1 % ▲
7 tests
17 −2 %
10 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
24 −2 % ▲
6 tests
17 ≈ average
9 tests
snow traction
71 +5 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
7 −4 %
5 tests
snow handling
15 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
13 −3 %
2 Tests
Wet
54 +3 %
7 tests
56 +4 % ▲
10 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
58 +3 %
6 tests
70 +5 % ▲
9 tests
Aquaplaning
26 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
22 −1 %
5 tests
wet handling
43 ≈ average
4 Tests
48 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
Dry
60 ≈ average
5 tests
78 +1 % ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
64 ≈ average
5 tests
75 +2 % ▲
5 tests
dry handling
57 ≈ average
4 Tests
74 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
1 Test 1 test
– Not measured.
3 Tests
Economy
21 −6 % ▲
4 Tests
5 −12 %
5 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
35 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
2 −7 %
4 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
28 −8 % ▲
3 Tests
21 −11 %
5 tests
Noise and comfort
51 −2 %
4 Tests
83 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
15 −2 %
3 Tests
16 −1 % ▲
4 Tests
ride comfort
50 Not measured.
78 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Snow Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Snow Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Wet Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Dry Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Economy Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 – Noise and comfort Yokohama V906 – Snow Yokohama V906 – Wet Yokohama V906 – Dry Yokohama V906 – Economy Yokohama V906 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 205/50 R17 among 52 available

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Snow

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 from 11 measurements · 7 tests
beats 14 of 61
24 −1,3 %
Yokohama V906 from 17 measurements · 10 tests
beats 10 of 61
17 −2,1 %

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 is the best.

Subcategories snow

snow braking

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 6 tests
beats 12 of 61
24 −2,0 %
Yokohama V906 9 tests
beats 9 of 61
17 ≈ average

snow traction

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 1 test
beats 34 of 54
71 +4,9 %
Yokohama V906 5 tests
beats 4 of 54
7 −3,8 %

snow handling

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 4 tests
beats 7 of 54
15 ≈ average
Yokohama V906 2 tests
beats 6 of 54
13 −3,2 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Wet

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 from 14 measurements · 7 tests
beats 37 of 69
54 +2,8 %
🏆 Yokohama V906 from 24 measurements · 10 tests
beats 38 of 69
56 +3,5 %

Yokohama V906 is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 6 tests
beats 38 of 69
58 +2,9 %
🏆 Yokohama V906 9 tests
beats 42 of 69
70 +4,8 %

Aquaplaning

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 4 tests
beats 17 of 57
26 ≈ average
Yokohama V906 5 tests
beats 15 of 57
22 −1,3 %

wet handling

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 4 tests
beats 26 of 55
43 ≈ average
🏆 Yokohama V906 2 tests
beats 30 of 55
48 +1,5 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 from 9 measurements · 5 tests
beats 33 of 56
60 ≈ average
🏆 Yokohama V906 from 7 measurements · 5 tests
beats 43 of 56
78 +1,3 %

Yokohama V906 is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 5 tests
beats 34 of 56
64 ≈ average
🏆 Yokohama V906 5 tests
beats 41 of 56
75 +1,8 %

dry handling

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 4 tests
beats 31 of 52
57 ≈ average
🏆 Yokohama V906 2 tests
beats 37 of 52
74 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 from 7 measurements · 4 tests
beats 11 of 55
21 −5,8 %
Yokohama V906 from 13 measurements · 5 tests
beats 2 of 55
5 −12,0 %

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 4 tests
beats 16 of 55
35 ≈ average
Yokohama V906 4 tests
beats 2 of 55
2 −7,2 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

🏆 Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 3 tests
beats 10 of 50
28 −8,0 %
Yokohama V906 5 tests
beats 6 of 50
21 −11,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 from 3 measurements · 4 tests
beats 28 of 56
51 −1,8 %
🏆 Yokohama V906 from 4 measurements · 4 tests
beats 46 of 56
83 ≈ average

Yokohama V906 is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 3 tests
beats 13 of 55
15 −1,9 %
🏆 Yokohama V906 4 tests
beats 14 of 55
16 −1,0 %

ride comfort

Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905
beats 21 of 38
50 Not measured.
🏆 Yokohama V906
beats 32 of 38
78 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.