20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Yokohama BLUEARTH-WINTER V905 vs Yokohama V906

6.9 Winter
BLUEARTH*WINTER V905
Yokohama
255/45R20 105V YOKOHAMA BLUEARTH-WINTER V905 XL RPB
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
7.4 Winter
V906
Yokohama
255/45R20 105V YOKOHAMA V906 XL/RF RPB
Passenger car Standard-sport
Rolling resistance D Wet grip B Noise B
from 91 380 Ft
6.9 BLUEARTH*WINTER V905 BLUEARTH*WINTER V905
7.4 V906 V906 from 91 380 Ft
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,9
7,4
Price from
–
91 380 Ft ▲ najlacnejšia
EU štítok
Rolling resistance C Wet grip C Noise B
Rolling resistance D Wet grip B Noise B
Discipline comparison
Snow
30 −1 % ▲
7 tests
19 −2 %
10 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
22 −2 % ▲
6 tests
17 ≈ average
9 tests
snow traction
69 +5 % ▲
1 test 1 test
7 −4 %
5 tests
snow handling
14 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
12 −3 %
2 Tests
Wet
30 ≈ average
7 tests
36 ≈ average ▲
10 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
57 +3 %
6 tests
69 +4 % ▲
9 tests
Aquaplaning
22 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
21 −1 %
5 tests
wet handling
43 ≈ average
4 Tests
46 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
Dry
38 ≈ average
5 tests
64 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
64 ≈ average
5 tests
75 +2 % ▲
5 tests
dry handling
55 ≈ average
4 Tests
74 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
3 Tests
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
18 −14 % ▲
1 test 1 test
9 −4 %
3 Tests
ice traction
7 −8 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
29 −5 % ▲
4 Tests
8 −10 %
5 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
35 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
2 −7 %
4 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
30 −8 % ▲
3 Tests
22 −10 %
5 tests
Noise and comfort
49 −2 %
4 Tests
70 −1 % ▲
4 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
13 −2 %
3 Tests
14 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
ride comfort
51 Not measured.
83 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓
M+S M+S
✓
✓
Rim protection Rim protection
✓
✓
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓
✓
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Rim protection Rim protection Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 255/45 R20 among 38 available

6.9 Yokohama BLUEARTH*WINTER V905
tested only in R15, R16, R17, R18
7.4 Yokohama V906
tested only in R16, R17, R18, R19
Snow
30 −1 % ▲
7 tests
19 −2 %
10 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
22 −2 % ▲
6 tests
17 ≈ average
9 tests
snow traction
69 +5 % ▲
1 test 1 test
7 −4 %
5 tests
snow handling
14 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
12 −3 %
2 Tests
Wet
30 ≈ average
7 tests
36 ≈ average ▲
10 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
57 +3 %
6 tests
69 +4 % ▲
9 tests
Aquaplaning
22 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
21 −1 %
5 tests
wet handling
43 ≈ average
4 Tests
46 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
Dry
38 ≈ average
5 tests
64 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
64 ≈ average
5 tests
75 +2 % ▲
5 tests
dry handling
55 ≈ average
4 Tests
74 ≈ average ▲
2 Tests
Ice
– Not measured.
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
3 Tests
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking
18 −14 % ▲
1 test 1 test
9 −4 %
3 Tests
ice traction
7 −8 %
1 test 1 test
– Not measured.
Economy
29 −5 % ▲
4 Tests
8 −10 %
5 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
35 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
2 −7 %
4 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
30 −8 % ▲
3 Tests
22 −10 %
5 tests
Noise and comfort
49 −2 %
4 Tests
70 −1 % ▲
4 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
13 −2 %
3 Tests
14 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
ride comfort
51 Not measured.
83 Not measured. ▲