19 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 120+ tests 280 000+ prices tracked
Eco-standard
Bridgestone Premium

EP25

Price from
Ft
in 165/70 R14
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches

We currently don't have a variant for the selected combination.

Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Vo vašom rozmere 165/70 R14 túto pneumatiku momentálne nepredáva ani jeden zo sledovaných e-shopov.

Nevadí — pozrite si priame alternatívy medzi konkurenciou alebo to, ako pneumatika obstála v testoch.

Rating and verdict

How the Ecopia EP25 evaluated

Skóre vychádza z 13 recenzií vodičov. ?

6.3
Overall score · / 10
✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🌱
Efficient and balanced low fuel consumption
💶
Good price/performance ratio a sensible choice
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

101 Ft ÷ 38 421 km × 100
0 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 165/70 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Bridgestone EP25 0 Ft
Yokohama ES32 53 Ft

Spomedzi porovnávaných má Bridgestone EP25 najnižšiu cenu na 100 km.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Eco-standard

The middle ground between economy and an ordinary tyre — Bridgestone EP25 sits exactly here. The manufacturer aims to keep fuel consumption low without paying for it with the weaker wet behaviour typical of purely economical models. In practice it is a tyre for drivers who cover a lot of kilometres and do not want to give up much safety along the way.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 165/70 R14
Width165 mm
Profile height70 %
Rim diameter14″
Load index (LI)81
Speed index (SI)T
Product code3286340508810
EAN3286340508810
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripC NoiseB (69 dB)
Manufacturer Bridgestone
Tread EP25
Season Summer
Vehicle type Passenger car
Focus Eco-standard
Construction Radial
Creation date 18.03.2018
Product launch date (gen.) 19.06.2019
Available technologies

No technologies are listed for this size.

Comparison

Konkurencia

Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.

Select a tyre to compare with Bridgestone EP25.
Price history

How the price has evolved

We don't have price history for this size yet.

User reviews

What owners say

2,9
★★★☆☆
z 7 recenzií
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
38 421 km
Reliability:confidence-low
DI
di***@gmail.com
Toyota Yaris · 175/65 R15 · 43 452 km
★★★☆☆

The tire behaved great for what it is and stayed largely consistent for most of its life.
The standout thing that I'd like to raise some awareness about was how much and how quickly it degraded during the fifth year of its life (the last 4-5k miles of its ~27k mile life) and while still having plenty of tread on it. It was apparent under a few specific recurring circumstances, out of which the most obvious and most common was on tight horseshoe turns. If the front tires were loaded due to braking (just slight amounts of braking, consider that one enters the turn under brakes and gradually lifts so that they are fully released potentially before hitting the apex) they were eager to lose traction and slide outwards when nearing the apex. We are talking about just slight amounts of skidding that required no corrections from the driver. They were essentially just enough to affect your confidence in the car. Still, it was something that started happening relatively suddenly and consistently and we became aware of it both during trips & travels and on familiar corners on known roads where we had been taking the car for years and years.
Other than that most other characteristics remained relatively consistent till the end. That is their noise, their general braking performance (though, luckily, I didn't have the "opportunity" to do much emergency braking), their behavior under high speed turns, their traction under first gear acceleration (say uphill stop and go, or with a heavy foot off a green light).
Lastly, I didn't feel too comfortable riding them in heavy rain lately, but that was a rare enough occurrence that I don't have enough experience to express an informed opinion on.
When I retired it it still had plenty of tread on it so I assume most of the degradation in performance was probably caused by the rubber aging.

TF
tf***@gmail.com
Nissan Note · 185/60 R16 · 8 047 km
★★☆☆☆

extremely danger in wet even you drive at speed 40kM/H

TR
tr***@gmail.com
Toyota Yaris · 175/65 R15 · 32 187 km
★★★☆☆

OEM summer tyres. I drove them for 20000miles or 37000km. Dry grip and handling was good, even now when they have 5< mm of rubber left on them. Wet grip and handling was good but not perfect. In the city they were safe on wet, but on the open road and higher speeds than 70kmh very unsafe and extremly laud. Straight aqua was better even when driving above 120kmh.
Wear was ok, but i wouldnt recommend them for any other driver except those who drive only in the city.
I am changing them now for Dunlop Sport Bluresponse.

SV
sv***@hotmail.com
Peugeot 208 1.5 BlueHDi · 185/65 R15 · 16 093 km
★★★★☆

These tyres are OEM on the car, with Treadwear 200 Temperature B Traction B
and EU labelling C for economy, B for wet braking and 70db.
Taking into account that the tire is an enviromentally friendly tire and not a sports one, here is what I think:
Dry braking is really good with no surprises whatsoever. I had an emergency braking because of a wild hog crossing the road and the tire outperformed the traction of the tarmac and the weather conditions, meaning you could tell it could have decelerated more without losing grip had the asphalt been completely dry and more rough.
Handling is also very good, despite the softness of the tire. This softness is present only in cornering at a high speed, so for normal driving and everyday use the tires are perfectly fine.
Feedback is also very good, you get on the wheel what you see on the road, so happy there, too.
On wet grip, I disagree with other people claiming the tire sucks. Yeah, it sucks if you think you're riding on a UHP tire. Keep in mind it's not a performance tire, with a Traction B rating, so prudence and reservation are mandatory on wet public roads where indifference, incompetence, arrogance and pure stupidity are also present.
Having said that, I think the Ecopia EP25 holds no surprises for the knowledgeable driver. Driving on the wet 20-30km/h less than on dry roads will give you the same results as in the dry.
Wet braking is mediocre at best at lower speeds (up to 80km/h) with the ABS engaging a bit more than I expected. This is the first reason I will not choose them again or recommend them, as well as the wear rate.
On the other hand, straight aqua is surprisingly good, even at 2cm of water, cutting through water ponds easily.
Wear is fast for these tyres. In 15.000km of 95% motorway use they have got down to 6,1mm of tread, which is a bad result for me, being an old Michelin user. In comparison, Michelin Energy Saver+ started at 7,2mm losing 0,5mm of tread every 10.000km on the same conditions (mind you, the Michelins are Treadwear 400).
Noise is annoying. Only on newly-paved surfaces will there be silence in the cabin; otherwise, get ready for a continuous roar or get a pair of ear-plugs.
All in all, I would choose my Michelin Saver+ over the Ecopia25 time and again, simply because they are better.

SH
sh***@jpmac.uk
Mazda 2 SP · 225/45 R17 · 13 671 km
★★☆☆☆

Absolutely useless. Only lasted 8,495 miles compared with previous Dunlop's 40,600. Soft as butter

Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?

Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.

Sign in