Firestone Mid-range WINTERHAWK 3
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
For a more accurate search, please enter your size — select the width, profile and rim diameter above.
Price comparison across shops
Select a size and we'll compare prices across shops.
How the Winterhawk 3 evaluated
Customer reviews are not part of PTI – PTI is based solely on measurements from independent tests.
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 155/65 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Of the tyres compared, Firestone WINTERHAWK 3 has the lowest cost per 100 km.
Technical information
Focus: Standard
The largest and best-selling category, and Firestone WINTERHAWK 3 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.
Select a size to display technologies.
Competitors
Main competitors in the same price range.
Successor to the model you are viewing
The tyre you are viewing already has a successor. We recommend choosing the more advanced model:
How the price has evolved
Select a size and we'll show how its price has evolved.
What owners say
Good looking tyre with reliable grip. I'm a sporty driver, although my car isn't sporty. The tyres give me a good grip, maybe not the best, but i've never felt losing grip while driving. Also in the snow it's very good. I would buy these again!
Got them as a used set of four. All same age - 2 years. The previous driver seemed to be an honest person. So nothing to say about that.
I was used to having Uniroyals on my previous car. No comparison to them. In dry and wet conditions the tyres are quite all right, but last winter luckily gave us a bit of slush and snow. The car behaved not good. Steering wasn't put through to the road.
I'll buy a pair of new ones soon. It'll not be the Winterhawk 3 again.
Been driving them around 40 000km (4 winters and 1 summer) on 2 wheel FWD car (1.6 atmo engine, no turbo so no torque). They are a pretty average tire. Handles everything well, master of none. Never got to the max of the tire (I drive 10-20kmh above limit and I'm a steady driver, no sharp turns, heavy braking or hard acceleration ), never had a scary situation, but never also had "wow this tire rocks" moment. It never stuck in the snow, never had problems with aquaplaning or on ice.
I even had it as a summer tyre this year and it still didn't wear (it is a better summer tire than Micheling Energy Saver). I'm currently on 5.5mm of thread which is outstanding. Not sure if its the tire or my suspension on the car, but bot tires (Energy Saver and WinterHawk 3) easily activated the ABS during braking. WinterHawk was little better in braking than the Energy Saver. For instance, on my other car (Skoda Fabia), you could brake harder and stop faster on less known tires (like the Barum Polaris or Bravuris 3HM). Skoda just digged in the asphalt or snow, while on my Megane ABS starts and the braking feeling is not so great. But this are two different cars, Megane is more comfortable than the Å koda but is also way more wallowy as the Å koda is much more direct in steering and grip.
I will replace them with premium All Season tires so will see if its the car or the tires.
Hello, I have Mercdes Benz. I have driven on lot of tyres, winter and summer. This is not my first snow or rain with this car. Firestone Winterhawk 3 is the worst tyre I had opportunity to drive on. On dry roads are relative ok, on wet roads it is better to stay home. On the snow also, like you don't have tyres. One season, around cca 10 000 km passed on these tyre and it will go to rubish... Very expensive tyres, and very bad tyres. I would never buy Firestone again.
Nothing to impress. It is balanced and affordable tire. Performance on snow is Ok if you drive normally. Dry and wet handling are satisfactory.