19 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 120+ tests 280 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Kumho Mid-range

ECSTA HS52

9.0
Overall score ✓ 8 tyre tests
Rolling resistance Wet grip Noise
4,0
★★★★☆
21 driver reviews
Price from
34 111 Ft
in 205/50 R17
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Your size 205/50 R17 Speed / Load: 93W XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 34 111 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
View prices →
Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Current prices for size 205/50 R17.

Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.

Rating and verdict

How the Ecsta HS52 evaluated

Skóre vychádza z 8 nezávislých testov a z 22 recenzií vodičov. ?

9.0
Overall score 9,0 / 10 6 disciplín meraných v nezávislých testoch. Recenzie vodičov sa premietajú do celkového skóre.
✓ Very reliable
60 70 80 90 100
Dry
Dry
98,2
Manoeuvring
Manoeuvring
97,9
Comfort
Comfort
95,8
Braking
Braking
95,2
Wet
Wet
93,3
Value
Value
79,1
very weak60–81 weaker81–89 average89–93 good93–96 very good96–98 top tier98–100

The number shows what percentage of the best tyre’s performance in the test this tyre achieved in this discipline.

Where it shines
Wet Wet good 93,3
Dry Dry top tier 98,2
!Where it falls short
Value Value very weak 79,1
Comfort Comfort good 95,8
🏆 Trophies from tests calculated from 8 tests
Top 3
Top 3 placement in the test
Recommended
Recommended
Best in the dry
Best in the dry
✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway
Reinforced profile
Reinforced profile Higher load capacity at higher pressure

Kde stojí Kumho ECSTA HS52 v rozmere 205/50 R17

Porovnané s 33 pneumatikami v tomto rozmere — rovnaká sezóna aj zameranie. Všetky sú v ponuke a majú výsledky z nezávislých testov.

najslabšianajlepšia
Táto pneumatika 9,0 34 111 Ft
Falken ZIEX ZE320 9.4 37 888 Ft Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 2 9.1 49 251 Ft Falken AZENIS FK520 9.1 33 170 Ft lepšia a lacnejšia Kumho ECSTA HS52 9.0 34 111 Ft Táto pneumatika Nokian Tyres POWERPROOF 2 8.9 37 158 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 4+ 8.9 49 510 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 5 8.7 49 273 Ft Firestone ROADHAWK 2 8.7 35 283 Ft Vredestein ULTRAC 8.6 Continental ULTRACONTACT 8.5 46 358 Ft Bridgestone T005DG 8.4 44 619 Ft Nokian Tyres POWERPROOF 1 8.4 43 209 Ft Bridgestone TURANZA 6 8.4 45 312 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 3 8.3 Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 2 8.2 36 365 Ft Nexen N'FERA PRIMUS 8.2 32 412 Ft Toyo PROXES COMFORT 8.2 35 583 Ft Bf goodrich Advantage 2 8.2 34 586 Ft Kleber DYNAXER HP4 8.2 Vredestein ULTRAC+ 8.1 37 214 Ft Pirelli CINTURATO P7 8.1 55 066 Ft Bridgestone ER300 7.9 Laufenn LK01 S FIT EQ+ 7.9 55 041 Ft Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 7.6 30 903 Ft Continental ContiPremiumContact 2 7.5 Apollo ASPIRE 4G+ XL FSL BSW 7.3 29 253 Ft Cooper SUMMER 7.1 36 149 Ft Bf goodrich G-GRIP 6.8 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP 6.7 60 712 Ft Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW 6.7 31 241 Ft Radar DIMAX R8 6.7 Matador HECTORRA 5 6.2 27 661 Ft RoadX RX MOTION U11 XL 5.2 23 830 Ft
5,2 medián 8,2 9,4
4. poradie v skupine z 33 porovnávaných
88 % pneumatík je slabších v tejto skupine
+0,8 nad mediánom skupiny medián skupiny 8,2
−0,4 na najlepšiu v skupine najlepšia má 9,4
💡 Za menej peňazí lepšie hodnotenie V tejto skupine je 1 pneumatika, ktorá má lepšie skóre a zároveň je lacnejšia.
Zobraziť všetky pneumatiky v rebríčku (33)
  1. 1. 9.4 Falken ZIEX ZE320 37 888 Ft +3 777 Ft
  2. 2. 9.1 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 2 49 251 Ft +15 140 Ft
  3. 2. 9.1 Falken AZENIS FK520 lepšia a lacnejšia 33 170 Ft −941 Ft
  4. 4. 9.0 Kumho ECSTA HS52 Táto pneumatika 34 111 Ft
  5. 5. 8.9 Nokian Tyres POWERPROOF 2 37 158 Ft +3 047 Ft
  6. 5. 8.9 Michelin PRIMACY 4+ 49 510 Ft +15 399 Ft
  7. 7. 8.7 Michelin PRIMACY 5 49 273 Ft +15 163 Ft
  8. 7. 8.7 Firestone ROADHAWK 2 35 283 Ft +1 172 Ft
  9. 9. 8.6 Vredestein ULTRAC
  10. 10. 8.5 Continental ULTRACONTACT 46 358 Ft +12 247 Ft
  11. 11. 8.4 Bridgestone T005DG 44 619 Ft +10 508 Ft
  12. 11. 8.4 Nokian Tyres POWERPROOF 1 43 209 Ft +9 098 Ft
  13. 11. 8.4 Bridgestone TURANZA 6 45 312 Ft +11 201 Ft
  14. 14. 8.3 Michelin PRIMACY 3
  15. 15. 8.2 Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 2 36 365 Ft +2 254 Ft
  16. 15. 8.2 Nexen N'FERA PRIMUS 32 412 Ft −1 699 Ft
  17. 15. 8.2 Toyo PROXES COMFORT 35 583 Ft +1 472 Ft
  18. 15. 8.2 Bf goodrich Advantage 2 34 586 Ft +475 Ft
  19. 15. 8.2 Kleber DYNAXER HP4
  20. 20. 8.1 Vredestein ULTRAC+ 37 214 Ft +3 103 Ft
  21. 20. 8.1 Pirelli CINTURATO P7 55 066 Ft +20 955 Ft
  22. 22. 7.9 Bridgestone ER300
  23. 22. 7.9 Laufenn LK01 S FIT EQ+ 55 041 Ft +20 930 Ft
  24. 24. 7.6 Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 30 903 Ft −3 208 Ft
  25. 25. 7.5 Continental ContiPremiumContact 2
  26. 26. 7.3 Apollo ASPIRE 4G+ XL FSL BSW 29 253 Ft −4 858 Ft
  27. 27. 7.1 Cooper SUMMER 36 149 Ft +2 038 Ft
  28. 28. 6.8 Bf goodrich G-GRIP
  29. 29. 6.7 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP 60 712 Ft +26 601 Ft
  30. 29. 6.7 Goodride SOLMAX 1 XL BSW 31 241 Ft −2 870 Ft
  31. 29. 6.7 Radar DIMAX R8
  32. 32. 6.2 Matador HECTORRA 5 27 661 Ft −6 450 Ft
  33. 33. 5.2 RoadX RX MOTION U11 XL 23 830 Ft −10 281 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

34 111 Ft ÷ 40 346 km × 100
85 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 205/50 R17 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Kumho ECSTA HS52 85 Ft
Bf goodrich Advantage 2 89 Ft

Spomedzi porovnávaných má Kumho ECSTA HS52 najnižšiu cenu na 100 km.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho ECSTA HS52 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 205/50 R17
Width205 mm
Profile height50 %
Rim diameter17″
Load index (LI)93
Speed index (SI)W
Product code2329033
EAN8808956352363
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB (72 dB)
Manufacturer Kumho
Tread ECSTA HS52
Season Summer
Vehicle type Passenger car
Focus Standard
Construction Radial
Creation date 29.12.2023
Product launch date (gen.) 02.07.2023
Available technologies
Zosilený profil Áno
Comparison

Konkurencia

Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.

Select a tyre to compare with Kumho ECSTA HS52.
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 4×
Wins 0×
Top 3 1×
Average placement 6,3
2026
9. place
ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/50 R17 2026
16 tyres
Detail →
2024
5. place
Auto Bild Test letných pneumatík 205/55 R16 2024
20 tyres
Detail →
3. place
ADAC Summer Tire Test 215/55 R17 2024
16 tyres
Detail →
2023
8. place
Tyrereviews Summer Tire Test 205/55 R16 2023
13 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 205/50 R17.

Current lowest
34 110,93 Ft
↗ 40 624,61 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
81,38 Ft
11.9.2026
Highest for the period
34 110,93 Ft
23.9.2026
34 110,93 81,38 34 110,93 Ft 22.6.2026 23.9.2026 22.6.2026: 83,76 Ft 25.6.2026: 82,98 Ft 1.7.2026: 83,13 Ft 24.7.2026: 83,17 Ft 29.7.2026: 81,92 Ft 29.7.2026: 81,75 Ft 31.7.2026: 81,92 Ft 1.8.2026: 81,75 Ft 8.8.2026: 81,57 Ft 14.8.2026: 83,17 Ft 15.8.2026: 83,36 Ft 19.8.2026: 83,56 Ft 22.8.2026: 83,76 Ft 28.8.2026: 83,56 Ft 1.9.2026: 81,70 Ft 2.9.2026: 81,52 Ft 11.9.2026: 81,38 Ft 11.9.2026: 81,55 Ft 16.9.2026: 83,16 Ft 18.9.2026: 82,96 Ft 21.9.2026: 81,49 Ft 21.9.2026: 81,64 Ft 23.9.2026: 34 110,93 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

4,0
★★★★☆
z 21 recenzií
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
40 346 km
Reliability:confidence-high
RO
ro***@abv.bg
Skoda Octavia · 195/65 R15 · 563 km
★★★★★

Coming from Lassa Greenways, this is a definite improvement in all categories, the tyre feels very direct with a nice bite into the corners. It has incredible road feedback giving you a lot of confidence. As for comfort it's not all that noisy, especially compared to the Lassa's, as for comfort they are a bit hard though not annoyingly so.
Some reviews say that they feel a bit of an imbalance when doing 110-130km/h and I can confirm got that as well, though it did clear up as they are driven(broken in).
You do feel the bumps and imperfections in the road a lot(but Bulgarian roads are harsh no matter the tyre really).
First impressions are that this tyre is definitely worth the money, especially for the price point they are at, 50 euro a tyre is incredible.

EL
el***@web.de
Skoda octavia estate 4x4 · 225/45 R17 · 16 093 km
★★★★☆

I bought these tires to replace a set of Goodyear EfficientGrip 1 that were on the car when I bought it (used). I drove the goodyear tires for about one month before replacing them due to age. The main difference between those tires is the fuel consumption. With the goodyears, I managed to get around 4.8L/100km while on the Kumhos, the car needs 5.2l/100km on the same journey.
Dry grip is excellent, I have not hit the ABS in the dry yet. Also cornering is absolutly fine.
Wet grip is also quite good, although I have hit the ABS a few times and broke the tires loose once when having to merge onto the Autobahn from a standstill. They outperform the (8 year old) Goodyears that were on the car before by quite some margine.
Comfort is fine, although they seem to be a bit louder than the goodyears.
The tires tend to get slightly flatspotted when parking for a few days. This causes a bit of a vibration that goes away after driving for a few kilometers. Neither the goodyears or the wintertires that are on the car now (Vredestein) do that.
The wear on these tires seems to be relativly low. I ran them for 15.000km this summer and they still have 6-6,5mm left. They had a bit more than 7.5mm when new. I expect them to last for another 30-40k km before needing to be replaced due to wear.
As I am working in forestry, I also drive these tires on forest dirt and gravel roads. On there, they are absolutly fine as long as its dry but get very slippery on dirt as soon as it gets wet. On some kinds of gravel, it feels like driving on ice when its wet, however thats more related to the kind of gravel (limestone) and not so much the tire. Every summertire I had so far showed this behavior. This part off the review has not been taken into account when rating the tire.

F.
f.***@hotmail.com
Honda Civic Diesel · 215/50 R17 · 24 140 km
★★★★☆

I find them quite good in the dry, even in dynamic driving. The wear is also very good, after more than 15,000 km.
But I'm extremely disappointed in the wet - in lateral support. On changes of surface in turns, or in roundabouts, I have to take it easy on the roads where I ride. So, it's not catastrophic, but it slips where I don't have problems with a Continental (the kumho is supposedly at the same level in the "tests" ).
When braking in a straight line, it didn't bother me.
It's better than Chinese, but I wouldn't buy it again for myself. I regularly and easily reach the limit of grip in corners when it's raining, even when I think I'm going slowly enough, I don't like it.

ER
er***@hotmail.com
Volkswagen Passat B7 · 235/45 R17 · 25 750 km
★★★☆☆

This tire is definitely a good choice for average users, unfortunately, based on my experience and usage, the tire did not perform well. It provides adequate lateral grip on both wet and dry roads, but it spins easily when accelerating and I do not feel confident when braking either. Probably due to the way it was used or a manufacturing defect, the tire started to wear out after the first season. This was the second season I've run it, and I feel like it's time for a change. The tread is now very badly damaged and I don't feel safe. 26.000 km / 16.000 miles

ED
ed***@gmail.com
Suzuki Swift · 185/55 R16
★☆☆☆☆

:)

Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?

Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.

Sign in