20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Kumho Mid-range

ECSTA HS52

8.0
PTI – Pneutesty Index
very good ✓ 6 tyre tests
PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 215/60 R16 among 48 available
tested in R16 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Price from
33 251 Ft
in 215/60 R16
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Your size 215/60 R16 Speed / Load: 99W XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB Price from 33 251 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
View prices →
Your size 215/60 R16 Speed / Load: 95V
Rolling resistanceA Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 33 724 Ft
Rating and verdict

How the Ecsta HS52 evaluated

8.0
PTI – Pneutesty Index 8,0 / 10 · very good PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 215/60 R16 among 48 available
tested in R16 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Discipline Percentile worsegroup averagebest Gap ⓘ Tests
Wet 84
+6 % 8 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 93
+10 % 6 tests
Aquaplaning 22
−2 % 6 tests
wet handling 62
+1 % 3 Tests
Dry 93
+4 % 8 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 87
+4 % 6 tests
dry handling 86
≈ average 3 Tests
Economy 57
+5 % 6 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 18
−1 % 6 tests
durability (wear and abrasion) 77
+13 % 5 tests
Noise and comfort 19
≈ average 5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 47
≈ average 5 tests
ride comfort 3
‹
Not measured. –
Where it is strong
Wetbetter than 84 %
Drybetter than 93 %
Where it falls behind
Noise and comfortworse than 81 % · ≈ ako priemer
🏆 Trophies from our data
🏆 Top 3 2× 1st–3rd place in 2 tests counted in PTI

Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway
Reinforced profile
Reinforced profile Higher load capacity at higher pressure

Where Kumho HS52 ECSTA stands in size 215/60 R16

Compared with 31 tyres in this size — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.

weakestbest
This tyre 8,0 33 251 Ft
Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 2 9.1 53 708 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 4 9.0 48 210 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 4+ 8.8 59 470 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 5 8.8 52 038 Ft Bridgestone TURANZA T005 8.7 50 395 Ft Falken ZIEX ZE320 8.6 39 061 Ft Pirelli CINTURATO P7 (P7C2) 8.4 61 383 Ft Bridgestone TURANZA 6 8.3 58 513 Ft Hankook K125 VENTUS PRIME3 8.1 44 225 Ft Nokian Tyres Wetproof 8.0 37 715 Ft Kumho HS52 ECSTA 8.0 33 251 Ft This tyre Dunlop BLUE RESPONSE TG 8.0 42 289 Ft Vredestein ULTRAC 7.9 57 007 Ft Falken ZIEX ZE310AEC 7.9 42 838 Ft Firestone ROADHAWK 2 7.8 39 195 Ft Toyo PROXES COMFORT 7.6 34 768 Ft Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 7.4 54 752 Ft Continental CONTIPREMIUMCONTACT 5 7.3 61 503 Ft Vredestein ULTRAC+ 7.3 43 424 Ft Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 7.3 49 192 Ft Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 2 7.2 35 375 Ft Firestone ROADHAWK 7.1 38 499 Ft Kleber DYNAXER HP4 7.0 43 978 Ft Bf goodrich Advantage 2 6.7 39 666 Ft Debica PRESTO HP 2 6.5 36 962 Ft Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 6.2 32 569 Ft Sava INTENSA HP 2 5.9 42 562 Ft Cooper SUMMER 5.8 36 491 Ft Kleber DYNAXER HP5 5.4 35 506 Ft Goodride Z-107 ZuperEco XL 5.4 29 821 Ft Minerva F209 4.0 32 191 Ft
4,0 median 7,6 9,1
10. rank in the group of 31 compared
61 % of tyres are weaker in this group
+0,4 above the group median group median 7,6
−1,1 behind the best in the group the best has 9,1
Show all tyres in the ranking (31)
  1. 1. 9.1 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 2 53 708 Ft +20 458 Ft
  2. 2. 9.0 Michelin PRIMACY 4 48 210 Ft +14 960 Ft
  3. 3. 8.8 Michelin PRIMACY 4+ 59 470 Ft +26 220 Ft
  4. 3. 8.8 Michelin PRIMACY 5 52 038 Ft +18 788 Ft
  5. 5. 8.7 Bridgestone TURANZA T005 50 395 Ft +17 144 Ft
  6. 6. 8.6 Falken ZIEX ZE320 39 061 Ft +5 810 Ft
  7. 7. 8.4 Pirelli CINTURATO P7 (P7C2) 61 383 Ft +28 132 Ft
  8. 8. 8.3 Bridgestone TURANZA 6 58 513 Ft +25 262 Ft
  9. 9. 8.1 Hankook K125 VENTUS PRIME3 44 225 Ft +10 975 Ft
  10. 10. 8.0 Nokian Tyres Wetproof 37 715 Ft +4 465 Ft
  11. 10. 8.0 Kumho HS52 ECSTA This tyre 33 251 Ft
  12. 10. 8.0 Dunlop BLUE RESPONSE TG 42 289 Ft +9 038 Ft
  13. 13. 7.9 Vredestein ULTRAC 57 007 Ft +23 757 Ft
  14. 13. 7.9 Falken ZIEX ZE310AEC 42 838 Ft +9 588 Ft
  15. 15. 7.8 Firestone ROADHAWK 2 39 195 Ft +5 944 Ft
  16. 16. 7.6 Toyo PROXES COMFORT 34 768 Ft +1 517 Ft
  17. 17. 7.4 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 54 752 Ft +21 501 Ft
  18. 18. 7.3 Continental CONTIPREMIUMCONTACT 5 61 503 Ft +28 252 Ft
  19. 18. 7.3 Vredestein ULTRAC+ 43 424 Ft +10 173 Ft
  20. 18. 7.3 Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 49 192 Ft +15 942 Ft
  21. 21. 7.2 Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 2 35 375 Ft +2 124 Ft
  22. 22. 7.1 Firestone ROADHAWK 38 499 Ft +5 248 Ft
  23. 23. 7.0 Kleber DYNAXER HP4 43 978 Ft +10 727 Ft
  24. 24. 6.7 Bf goodrich Advantage 2 39 666 Ft +6 415 Ft
  25. 25. 6.5 Debica PRESTO HP 2 36 962 Ft +3 712 Ft
  26. 26. 6.2 Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 32 569 Ft −682 Ft
  27. 27. 5.9 Sava INTENSA HP 2 42 562 Ft +9 311 Ft
  28. 28. 5.8 Cooper SUMMER 36 491 Ft +3 240 Ft
  29. 29. 5.4 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 35 506 Ft +2 255 Ft
  30. 29. 5.4 Goodride Z-107 ZuperEco XL 29 821 Ft −3 430 Ft
  31. 31. 4.0 Minerva F209 32 191 Ft −1 060 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

33 251 Ft ÷ 41 672 km × 100
80 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 215/60 R16 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Kumho ECSTA HS52 80 Ft
Bf goodrich Advantage 2 117 Ft

Of the tyres compared, Kumho ECSTA HS52 has the lowest cost per 100 km.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho ECSTA HS52 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 215/60 R16
Width215 mm
Profile height60 %
Rim diameter16″
Load index (LI)99
Speed index (SI)W
Product code2328693
EAN8808956352165
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB (72 dB)
Manufacturer Kumho
Tread ECSTA HS52
Season Summer
Vehicle type Passenger car
Available technologies
Zosilený profil Áno
Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Kumho ECSTA HS52.
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 4×
Wins 0×
Top 3 1×
Average placement 6,3
2026
9. place
ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/50 R17 2026
16 tyres
Detail →
2024
5. place
Auto Bild Test letných pneumatík 205/55 R16 2024
20 tyres
Detail →
3. place
ADAC Summer Tire Test 215/55 R17 2024
16 tyres
Detail →
2023
8. place
Tyrereviews Summer Tire Test 205/55 R16 2023
13 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 215/60 R16.

Current lowest
33 250,57 Ft
↗ 33 472,87 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
94,64 Ft
2.10.2026
Highest for the period
33 250,57 Ft
14.10.2026
33 250,57 94,64 33 250,57 Ft 22.6.2026 14.10.2026 22.6.2026: 99,04 Ft 29.7.2026: 96,12 Ft 1.9.2026: 96,08 Ft 2.9.2026: 95,23 Ft 3.9.2026: 95,15 Ft 4.9.2026: 95,25 Ft 11.9.2026: 95,01 Ft 14.9.2026: 94,84 Ft 15.9.2026: 95,37 Ft 16.9.2026: 95,39 Ft 17.9.2026: 95,35 Ft 19.9.2026: 95,19 Ft 22.9.2026: 95,15 Ft 24.9.2026: 94,96 Ft 26.9.2026: 95,09 Ft 2.10.2026: 94,64 Ft 6.10.2026: 98,99 Ft 6.10.2026: 94,64 Ft 7.10.2026: 94,78 Ft 8.10.2026: 94,90 Ft 9.10.2026: 95,03 Ft 14.10.2026: 33 250,57 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

4,0
★★★★☆
from 22 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
41 672 km
Reliability:confidence-high
17
17***@noreg.com
Peugeot 207 1.6hdi 9Sport) · 225/45 R17 · 16 093 km
★★★★★

<p>Simply great tyres compared to their price. Very good dry grip (I didn’t try their wet grip as it rarely rains where I live). Road noise is noticeably low & wear is minimal.
I recommended them to my friends and they are all happy with them.</p>

RO
ro***@abv.bg
Skoda Octavia · 195/65 R15 · 563 km
★★★★★

Coming from Lassa Greenways, this is a definite improvement in all categories, the tyre feels very direct with a nice bite into the corners. It has incredible road feedback giving you a lot of confidence. As for comfort it's not all that noisy, especially compared to the Lassa's, as for comfort they are a bit hard though not annoyingly so.
Some reviews say that they feel a bit of an imbalance when doing 110-130km/h and I can confirm got that as well, though it did clear up as they are driven(broken in).
You do feel the bumps and imperfections in the road a lot(but Bulgarian roads are harsh no matter the tyre really).
First impressions are that this tyre is definitely worth the money, especially for the price point they are at, 50 euro a tyre is incredible.

EL
el***@web.de
Skoda octavia estate 4x4 · 225/45 R17 · 16 093 km
★★★★☆

I bought these tires to replace a set of Goodyear EfficientGrip 1 that were on the car when I bought it (used). I drove the goodyear tires for about one month before replacing them due to age. The main difference between those tires is the fuel consumption. With the goodyears, I managed to get around 4.8L/100km while on the Kumhos, the car needs 5.2l/100km on the same journey.
Dry grip is excellent, I have not hit the ABS in the dry yet. Also cornering is absolutly fine.
Wet grip is also quite good, although I have hit the ABS a few times and broke the tires loose once when having to merge onto the Autobahn from a standstill. They outperform the (8 year old) Goodyears that were on the car before by quite some margine.
Comfort is fine, although they seem to be a bit louder than the goodyears.
The tires tend to get slightly flatspotted when parking for a few days. This causes a bit of a vibration that goes away after driving for a few kilometers. Neither the goodyears or the wintertires that are on the car now (Vredestein) do that.
The wear on these tires seems to be relativly low. I ran them for 15.000km this summer and they still have 6-6,5mm left. They had a bit more than 7.5mm when new. I expect them to last for another 30-40k km before needing to be replaced due to wear.
As I am working in forestry, I also drive these tires on forest dirt and gravel roads. On there, they are absolutly fine as long as its dry but get very slippery on dirt as soon as it gets wet. On some kinds of gravel, it feels like driving on ice when its wet, however thats more related to the kind of gravel (limestone) and not so much the tire. Every summertire I had so far showed this behavior. This part off the review has not been taken into account when rating the tire.

F.
f.***@hotmail.com
Honda Civic Diesel · 215/50 R17 · 24 140 km
★★★★☆

I find them quite good in the dry, even in dynamic driving. The wear is also very good, after more than 15,000 km.
But I&#39;m extremely disappointed in the wet - in lateral support. On changes of surface in turns, or in roundabouts, I have to take it easy on the roads where I ride. So, it&#39;s not catastrophic, but it slips where I don&#39;t have problems with a Continental (the kumho is supposedly at the same level in the &quot;tests&quot; ).
When braking in a straight line, it didn&#39;t bother me.
It&#39;s better than Chinese, but I wouldn&#39;t buy it again for myself. I regularly and easily reach the limit of grip in corners when it&#39;s raining, even when I think I&#39;m going slowly enough, I don&#39;t like it.

ER
er***@hotmail.com
Volkswagen Passat B7 · 235/45 R17 · 25 750 km
★★★☆☆

This tire is definitely a good choice for average users, unfortunately, based on my experience and usage, the tire did not perform well. It provides adequate lateral grip on both wet and dry roads, but it spins easily when accelerating and I do not feel confident when braking either. Probably due to the way it was used or a manufacturing defect, the tire started to wear out after the first season. This was the second season I've run it, and I feel like it's time for a change. The tread is now very badly damaged and I don't feel safe. 26.000 km / 16.000 miles

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in