Kumho Mid-range PS91 ECSTA
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured incomplete measurement: no wear measurement 
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
For a more accurate search, please enter your size — select the width, profile and rim diameter above.
Price comparison across shops
Select a size and we'll compare prices across shops.
How the Ecsta PS91 evaluated
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured incomplete measurement: no wear measurement 
wear not measured 
Wet 65 what it consists of Wet (3)
Dry 72 what it consists of Dry (2)
Economy 10 what it consists of Economy (1)
Noise and comfort 47 what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.
Where Kumho PS91 ECSTA stands among comparable tyres
Compared with 32 tyres — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.
Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 9.9 31 970 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6 9.6 38 559 Ft 
Michelin PILOT SPORT 5 9.4 48 001 Ft 
Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 9.4 41 773 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 5 9.2 35 783 Ft 
Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT 8.6 44 465 Ft 
Hankook K127 VENTUS S1 EVO3 8.5 41 130 Ft 
Kumho PS72 8.5 29 954 Ft 
Pirelli P-ZERO (PZ4) S.C. 8.2 40 683 Ft 
Vredestein ULTRAC PRO 8.1 42 901 Ft 
Dunlop SPORT MAXX RT2 8.0 36 752 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 2 7.9 56 629 Ft 
Kumho ECSTA PS71 7.9 32 471 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 3 7.7 36 038 Ft 
Nexen N'FERA SPORT 7.7 28 522 Ft 
Uniroyal RAINSPORT 5 7.5 23 323 Ft 
Sailun ATREZZO ZSR2 7.5 32 221 Ft 
Continental CONTISPORTCONTACT 5 7.4 34 959 Ft 
Bridgestone POTENZA S001 7.3 51 663 Ft 
Yokohama V107 7.3 39 703 Ft 
Vredestein ULTRAC VORTI+ 7.3 45 138 Ft Kumho PS91 ECSTA 7.1 52 274 Ft This tyre 
Sava INTENSA UHP 2 7.0 29 189 Ft 
Fulda SPORTCONTROL 2 7.0 30 975 Ft 
Pirelli PZERO 7.0 66 252 Ft 
Nexen N'FERA SPORT SUV 7.0 36 079 Ft 
Debica PRESTO UHP 2 6.9 32 190 Ft 
Yokohama V701 6.5 27 079 Ft 
Yokohama V105 6.2 31 291 Ft 
Triangle EFFEXSPORT TH202 5.4 24 120 Ft 
Nexen N'FERA RU1 5.4 41 473 Ft 
Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport 5.3 50 979 Ft Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport 50 979 Ft 9.9 best in the group Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 31 970 Ft Show all tyres in the ranking (32)
- 1. 9.9 31 970 Ft
- 2. 9.6 38 559 Ft
- 3. 9.4 48 001 Ft
- 3. 9.4 41 773 Ft
- 5. 9.2 35 783 Ft
- 6. 8.6 44 465 Ft
- 7. 8.5 41 130 Ft
- 7. 8.5 29 954 Ft
- 9. 8.2 40 683 Ft
- 10. 8.1 42 901 Ft
- 11. 8.0 36 752 Ft
- 12. 7.9 56 629 Ft
- 12. 7.9 32 471 Ft
- 14. 7.7 36 038 Ft
- 14. 7.7 28 522 Ft
- 16. 7.5 23 323 Ft
- 16. 7.5 32 221 Ft
- 18. 7.4 34 959 Ft
- 19. 7.3 51 663 Ft
- 19. 7.3 39 703 Ft
- 19. 7.3 45 138 Ft
- 22. 7.1 52 274 Ft
- 23. 7.0 29 189 Ft
- 23. 7.0 30 975 Ft
- 23. 7.0 66 252 Ft
- 23. 7.0 36 079 Ft
- 27. 6.9 32 190 Ft
- 28. 6.5 27 079 Ft
- 29. 6.2 31 291 Ft
- 30. 5.4 24 120 Ft
- 30. 5.4 41 473 Ft
- 32. 5.3 50 979 Ft
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 265/40 R20 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Hankook K137 VENTUS EVO works out cheaper per 100 km.
Technical information
Focus: Sport
With sport tyres, grip in every situation is what decides — under hard acceleration, under braking, in the dry and in the wet. Kumho PS91 ECSTA belongs to this group. Stability at higher speeds and precision through corners come on top of that. One thing drivers often underestimate when buying: grip comes from a softer compound, and a softer compound wears faster. Where a standard tyre covers roughly 40,000 km, a sport tyre manages about 20,000 to 30,000 km — and considerably less with a sharper driving style or a heavier, more powerful car.
Select a size to display technologies.
Competitors
Main competitors in the same price range.
Which tests it appeared in
0× 
0× 
Auto Motor und Sport How the price has evolved
Select a size and we'll show how its price has evolved.
What owners say
<p>Tyre were used on a 470 HP RWD 1.7 t car. For the money, this is a very good budget tyre for spirited driving and even occasional track use. The tyre offers decent grip, a stiff sidewall, and responsive handling that gives you confidence when pushing the car on twisty roads or during a track day.</p><p>What impressed me the most was its durability. Compared to some other performance-oriented tyres, the tread lasted quite a long time, which makes it an attractive option if you're looking for a balance between performance and running costs. Wet weather performance was also perfectly acceptable. I never experienced any unpleasant surprises and always felt comfortable driving in the rain.</p><p>However, once the tyre reached around 60-50% tread depth, its characteristics changed noticeably. Dry grip dropped significantly, and the tyre no longer delivered the same confidence and performance it had when new. This was especially noticeable during more aggressive driving, where the reduced grip became quite apparent. For my application I did not mind as first half of the tyre I used for track days and fast road driving and second half was used for doing skids and enjoying RWD car as you should :D</p><p>Noise levels were never an issue and remained low throughout its lifespan.</p><p>Overall, I would recommend this tyre to anyone looking for a budget-friendly performance tyre that can handle spirited road driving and the occasional track day. Just be aware that its dry performance deteriorates quite a bit once the tread wears down to around half of its original depth.</p>
Bought my 2015 f10 520d with 210k kms 2 years ago had these tyres but *star branded OE bmw, the car now has nearly 290k kms and these tyres are still around 4.5mm of tread left after more than 80.000 kilometers of driving, all 4 tyres are the same and i rotate them roughly every 15.000kms but i am impressed by wear of these tyres even tho its a 2liter diesel, the previous owner bought these tyres i would personally never buy tyres like these for a 2.0diesel 5 series but overall the wear is really good, noise has always been relatively quiet and comfort is ok, altho its a luxury line 5 series so i cannot really comment on comfort much as ive only had winter tyres on to compare and they are about the same, fuel consumption has always been around 6.5l to 7l per 100km in this car with these tyres, they have been good in the wet also never felt the car struggle even when giving it some power in the rain, im not sure how the normal ps91 is compared to the *star branded OE but i have been quite impressed with these tyres, especially the wear, as i drove maybe 5000km on winter tyres and everything else was done on these ps91*
When these tyres are done i will def put some touring tyres on the car as i feel these UUHP are not really needed.
Cant comment too much about handling as ive never really pushed the car just driven fast in straight line.
Need a lot of heat to get good grip
Put a set of these on my Mercedes V Class, very disappointed with the wear, as only lasted 10k on the rears & possibly 12k on the fronts, I expected at least 15k as not a budget brand!
Had Pirelli scorpion verde originally on my SUV which were a high performing tires. Had to change due to wear and decided to give the Kumho a try. Ill be brief, this is a very sluggish tire which will make your car feel heavy and demand more power during acceleration. If you’re looking for performance tires this isnt the one. This is more of a day to day commute tire.