Kumho Mid-range WINTERCRAFT WP52+
tested only in R15, R17, R18 
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.
Speed index (SI) — For winter (3PMSF) tyres, the SI may be either higher or lower than stated in the vehicle registration document.
C 
A 
B Price from 62 937 Ft 
Reinforced profile 
M+S 
3PMSF 
Suitable for EVs Price comparison across shops
Current prices for size 245/45 R19.
Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.
How the WinterCraft WP52 plus evaluated
tested only in R15, R17, R18 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured 
Snow 84 what it consists of Snow (3)
Wet 88 what it consists of Wet (3)
Dry 79 what it consists of Dry (2)
Ice – what it consists of Ice (1)
Economy 55 what it consists of Economy (2)
Noise and comfort 1 what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.
Where Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ stands in size 245/45 R19
Compared with 20 tyres in this size — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.
Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P 9.1 75 565 Ft 
Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6 9.1 82 649 Ft 
Hankook W340 WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 8.6 68 723 Ft 
Dunlop WINTER 8.6 79 700 Ft Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 8.4 62 937 Ft This tyre 
Bf goodrich G-FORCE WINTER2 8.3 73 100 Ft 
Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.1 64 337 Ft 
Semperit SPEED-GRIP 5 7.9 67 157 Ft 
Uniroyal WINTEREXPERT 7.8 67 561 Ft 
Barum POLARIS 6 7.7 62 789 Ft 
Firestone WINTERHAWK 4 7.6 65 091 Ft 
Toyo OBSERVE EWS1 7.6 58 400 Ft 
Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 7.5 67 551 Ft 
Fulda KRISTALL CONTROL HP 2 7.4 69 254 Ft 
Giti GITIWINTER W2 7.2 90 123 Ft 
Nexen WINGUARD SPORT 2 7.0 62 755 Ft 
Radar DIMAX WINTER 6.8 65 678 Ft 
Hankook W320B WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 6.6 76 410 Ft 
Matador MP93 NORDICCA 6.6 54 544 Ft 
Minerva S210 XL M+S 4.2 41 746 Ft Minerva S210 XL M+S 41 746 Ft −21 191 Ft 9.1 best in the group Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P 75 565 Ft +12 628 Ft Show all tyres in the ranking (20)
- 1. 9.1 75 565 Ft +12 628 Ft
- 1. 9.1 82 649 Ft +19 712 Ft
- 3. 8.6 68 723 Ft +5 786 Ft
- 3. 8.6 79 700 Ft +16 763 Ft
- 5. 8.4 62 937 Ft
- 6. 8.3 73 100 Ft +10 163 Ft
- 7. 8.1 64 337 Ft +1 400 Ft
- 8. 7.9 67 157 Ft +4 220 Ft
- 9. 7.8 67 561 Ft +4 624 Ft
- 10. 7.7 62 789 Ft −149 Ft
- 11. 7.6 65 091 Ft +2 154 Ft
- 11. 7.6 58 400 Ft −4 538 Ft
- 13. 7.5 67 551 Ft +4 614 Ft
- 14. 7.4 69 254 Ft +6 317 Ft
- 15. 7.2 90 123 Ft +27 186 Ft
- 16. 7.0 62 755 Ft −183 Ft
- 17. 6.8 65 678 Ft +2 741 Ft
- 18. 6.6 76 410 Ft +13 472 Ft
- 18. 6.6 54 544 Ft −8 393 Ft
- 20. 4.2 41 746 Ft −21 191 Ft
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 245/45 R19 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Of the tyres compared, Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ has the lowest cost per 100 km.
Technical information
Focus: Standard
The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.
C A B (71 dB) 
3PMSF Áno Competitors
Main competitors in the same price range.
Which tests it appeared in
0× 
0× 
How the price has evolved
Lowest price across shops for size 245/45 R19.
The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.
What owners say
I have to buy a new tyre because Hankook Winter i*recept rs3 had the quality issues.. Hankook generates vibration and radial runout.. After very positive reviews and test results I decide to buy Kumho Wintercraft WP52+ in the size 225 45 r17.
I made one season on this tyres and had opportunity to test this tyres in each conditions, because this year winter in Poland was very snowy and cold. The tyres are very quiet. Quieter than my Sommer Falken Fk520...
The grip on the dry and wet I great, the tyres are very comfortable. And the quaility of the tyre is great. Because of the bad experience with falken and Hankook. I decided to check the tyre on Hunter road force test. And the results were impressing. 25N,10N,5N!. One tyre was worse because have rubber rissees form production and has 85 N... But I got information that this rubber rissees will go out after the driving and it was true.
I am very satisfied with this tyres. I forgot to mention about snow and ice grip and it was very good. On the ice usually only the studs help, but during this winter I don't have any issues with grip and handling. Well done Kumho.
I didn't evaluate the grip because it is the first season and I didn't make as many km as usually.
Poprawiona i bardziej naturalna wersja po angielsku:
I had to buy new tyres because the Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 had quality issues. The Hankooks generated vibrations and had radial runout problems. After reading many positive reviews and test results, I decided to buy the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ in size 225/45 R17.
I used these tyres for one season and had the opportunity to test them in all conditions, because this winter in Poland was very snowy and cold. The tyres are very quiet - even quieter than my summer Falken FK520 tyres.
The grip on dry and wet roads is great, and the tyres are very comfortable. The build quality is also excellent. Because of my bad experiences with Falken and Hankook, I decided to check the tyres using a Hunter Road Force test, and the results were impressive: 25 N, 10 N, and 5 N. One tyre performed worse because it had rubber residues from production and showed 85 N, but I was informed that the issue would disappear after some driving - and it did.
I am very satisfied with these tyres. I almost forgot to mention the snow and ice performance, which was also very good. On ice, usually only studded tyres provide perfect grip, but during this winter I had no issues with traction or handling. Well done, Kumho.
I didn’t evaluate tread wear yet because this was only the first season and I haven’t driven as many kilometres as usual.
Great tyres for the cost, transforms car in winter with great grip, water shedding and ride comfort
Comparing the brands like Continental, Bridgestone, Hankook, Michelin, we are very impressed by the progression of Kumho. The wp52+ tested in France in the Vosges and in the city is impressive. Tire and report quality price incomparable.
Mounted these this season on my BMW 530i xDrive, and after a few hundred kilometers of mixed driving, including mountain roads with tight hairpins, wet tarmac, and temperatures between 3–5°C, I’m genuinely impressed. With all driver aids turned off, the grip was annoyingly good; no matter how much I tried to unsettle the car, it simply stuck to the road.
Coming from Continental run-flats, the comfort improvement is immediately noticeable. The ride feels more compliant, and surprisingly, the road noise is minimal barely distinguishable from my summer Michelin Primacy 3s. That was an unexpected bonus.
As for fuel consumption, I can’t make a direct comparison since my winter setup is 245/45 R18 all around, while summer is 245 front / 275 rear on 19-inch wheels. Still, the overall consumption seems similar.
So far, the WP52+ have been flawless in all conditions tested wet grip, handling, comfort, and noise are top-notch. I’ll post an update once I’ve had the chance to test them on snow and ice, but as it stands, Kumho really nailed it with this tire.
Best deal ever!
Tyres are premium feel, Class A wet grip, drive like a german tyre on a BMW Touring 320D. Made in Korea.
The only other Class A wet grip tyre is Bridgestone, with $55 more per tyre.
Kumho is the top-brand of the corporation, the budget version is Marshall.