20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Kumho Mid-range

WINTERCRAFT WP52+

8.4
PTI – Pneutesty Index
very good ✓ 3 tyre tests
PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 235/55 R19 among 40 available
tested only in R15, R17, R18 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Price from
50 740 Ft
in 235/55 R19
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For winter (3PMSF) tyres, the SI may be either higher or lower than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Your size 235/55 R19 Speed / Load: 108V XL
Rolling resistanceB Wet gripB NoiseB Price from 50 740 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile 3PMSF 3PMSF Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
View prices →
Your size 235/55 R19 Speed / Load: 105V XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB Price from 51 647 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile 3PMSF 3PMSF Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
Rating and verdict

How the WinterCraft WP52 plus evaluated

8.4
PTI – Pneutesty Index 8,4 / 10 · very good PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 235/55 R19 among 40 available
tested only in R15, R17, R18 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Discipline Percentile worsegroup averagebest Gap ⓘ Tests
Snow 86
+4 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 82
+4 % 2 Tests
snow traction 83
+3 % 2 Tests
snow handling 95
+3 % 1 test
Wet 90
+4 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 93
+10 % 2 Tests
Aquaplaning 67
−1 % 2 Tests
wet handling 89
+3 % 1 test
Dry 84
+2 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 94
+4 % 3 Tests
dry handling 23
≈ average 1 test
Ice –
Not measured. 1 test 1 test
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking 61
+1 % 1 test
Economy 70
+7 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 35
−1 % 3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion) 65
+9 % 3 Tests
Noise and comfort 1
≈ average 2 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 32
≈ average 2 Tests
ride comfort 2
Not measured. –
Where it is strong
Snowbetter than 86 %
Wetbetter than 90 %
Drybetter than 84 %
Where it falls behind
Noise and comfortworse than 99 % · ≈ ako priemer
🏆 Trophies from our data
🏆 Top 3 1× 1st–3rd place in 1 tests counted in PTI

Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway
Reinforced profile
Reinforced profile Higher load capacity at higher pressure
3PMSF
3PMSF Certified for winter conditions
Suitable for EVs
Suitable for EVs Reinforced for EV weight and torque

Where Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ stands in size 235/55 R19

Compared with 21 tyres in this size — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.

weakestbest
This tyre 8,4 50 740 Ft
6,6 median 7,6 9,1
6. rank in the group of 21 compared
71 % of tyres are weaker in this group
+0,8 above the group median group median 7,6
−0,7 behind the best in the group the best has 9,1
Show all tyres in the ranking (21)
  1. 1. 9.1 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P 62 327 Ft +11 586 Ft
  2. 1. 9.1 Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6 69 991 Ft +19 251 Ft
  3. 3. 8.9 Michelin ALPIN 7 76 998 Ft +26 257 Ft
  4. 4. 8.7 Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X 61 496 Ft +10 755 Ft
  5. 5. 8.6 Hankook W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV 57 976 Ft +7 236 Ft
  6. 6. 8.4 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ This tyre 50 740 Ft
  7. 7. 8.1 Kleber KRISALP HP3 54 634 Ft +3 894 Ft
  8. 8. 7.9 Semperit SPEED-GRIP 5 58 692 Ft +7 951 Ft
  9. 9. 7.8 Uniroyal WINTEREXPERT 61 306 Ft +10 566 Ft
  10. 10. 7.7 Barum POLARIS 6 55 688 Ft +4 948 Ft
  11. 11. 7.6 Firestone WINTERHAWK 4 55 208 Ft +4 468 Ft
  12. 12. 7.5 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 58 158 Ft +7 418 Ft
  13. 13. 7.4 Laufenn LW31 I FIT+ 50 709 Ft −32 Ft
  14. 14. 7.3 Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 3 71 819 Ft +21 078 Ft
  15. 14. 7.3 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV SILENTDRIVE 65 399 Ft +14 658 Ft
  16. 16. 7.1 Michelin LATITUDE ALPIN LA2 106 242 Ft +55 502 Ft
  17. 17. 6.9 Radar DIMAX ALPINE
  18. 18. 6.8 Radar DIMAX WINTER 54 863 Ft +4 122 Ft
  19. 19. 6.7 Toyo S954 SNOWPROX SUV 50 428 Ft −312 Ft
  20. 20. 6.6 Matador MP93 NORDICCA 50 801 Ft +61 Ft
  21. 20. 6.6 Maxxis PREMITRA SNOW WP6 SUV 48 039 Ft −2 701 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

50 740 Ft ÷ 41 114 km × 100
123 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 235/55 R19 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 235/55 R19
Width235 mm
Profile height55 %
Rim diameter19″
Load index (LI)108
Speed index (SI)V
Product code2371733
EAN8808956618490
EU energy label Rolling resistanceB Wet gripB NoiseB (71 dB)
Manufacturer Kumho
Tread WINTERCRAFT WP52+
Season Winter
Vehicle type SUV / 4×4
Focus Standard
Construction Radial
Creation date 17.07.2025
Product launch date (gen.) 29.08.2025
Available technologies
Zosilený profil Áno
3PMSF 3PMSF Áno
Vhodné pre elektro Áno - EV READY
Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+.
Compare →
Toyo S954 SNOWPROX SUV
Toyo
S954 SNOWPROX SUV
6.7
from 89 693 Ft
This tyre
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+
Kumho
WINTERCRAFT WP52+
8.4
from 50 740 Ft
Reference tyre
Compare →
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52
Kumho
WINTERCRAFT WP52
8.0
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 1×
Wins 0×
Top 3 0×
Average placement 12,0
2026
12. place
ADAC Winter Tyre Test 185/65 R15 2026
16 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 235/55 R19.

Current lowest
50 740,31 Ft
↗ 24 254,57 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
123,01 Ft
10.9.2026
Highest for the period
50 740,31 Ft
14.10.2026
50 740,31 123,01 50 740,31 Ft 22.6.2026 14.10.2026 22.6.2026: 208,34 Ft 22.6.2026: 205,91 Ft 13.7.2026: 128,53 Ft 13.7.2026: 124,26 Ft 14.7.2026: 124,79 Ft 15.7.2026: 124,42 Ft 16.7.2026: 124,80 Ft 17.7.2026: 124,84 Ft 17.7.2026: 130,60 Ft 18.7.2026: 130,12 Ft 21.7.2026: 130,30 Ft 22.7.2026: 130,58 Ft 23.7.2026: 130,50 Ft 24.7.2026: 130,48 Ft 25.7.2026: 130,61 Ft 28.7.2026: 130,97 Ft 30.7.2026: 130,66 Ft 30.7.2026: 130,60 Ft 31.7.2026: 131,10 Ft 31.7.2026: 132,50 Ft 1.8.2026: 132,41 Ft 3.8.2026: 129,77 Ft 4.8.2026: 130,12 Ft 5.8.2026: 129,80 Ft 6.8.2026: 130,01 Ft 7.8.2026: 130,22 Ft 8.8.2026: 130,12 Ft 11.8.2026: 130,05 Ft 12.8.2026: 130,18 Ft 13.8.2026: 130,60 Ft 13.8.2026: 129,82 Ft 14.8.2026: 128,52 Ft 15.8.2026: 127,83 Ft 19.8.2026: 123,04 Ft 20.8.2026: 123,02 Ft 1.9.2026: 123,05 Ft 2.9.2026: 123,02 Ft 10.9.2026: 123,01 Ft 15.9.2026: 125,02 Ft 15.9.2026: 126,68 Ft 21.9.2026: 128,27 Ft 22.9.2026: 128,52 Ft 23.9.2026: 128,67 Ft 23.9.2026: 128,77 Ft 24.9.2026: 128,40 Ft 24.9.2026: 126,68 Ft 25.9.2026: 127,83 Ft 25.9.2026: 127,50 Ft 26.9.2026: 127,83 Ft 26.9.2026: 126,68 Ft 8.10.2026: 128,70 Ft 9.10.2026: 129,21 Ft 13.10.2026: 128,26 Ft 13.10.2026: 129,21 Ft 14.10.2026: 50 740,31 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

4,2
★★★★☆
from 5 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
41 114 km
Reliability:confidence-high
MA
ma***@interia.pl
Audi A3 Sportback · 225/45 R17 · 4 268 km
★★★★☆

I have to buy a new tyre because Hankook Winter i*recept rs3 had the quality issues.. Hankook generates vibration and radial runout.. After very positive reviews and test results I decide to buy Kumho Wintercraft WP52+ in the size 225 45 r17.
I made one season on this tyres and had opportunity to test this tyres in each conditions, because this year winter in Poland was very snowy and cold. The tyres are very quiet. Quieter than my Sommer Falken Fk520...
The grip on the dry and wet I great, the tyres are very comfortable. And the quaility of the tyre is great. Because of the bad experience with falken and Hankook. I decided to check the tyre on Hunter road force test. And the results were impressing. 25N,10N,5N!. One tyre was worse because have rubber rissees form production and has 85 N... But I got information that this rubber rissees will go out after the driving and it was true.
I am very satisfied with this tyres. I forgot to mention about snow and ice grip and it was very good. On the ice usually only the studs help, but during this winter I don't have any issues with grip and handling. Well done Kumho.
I didn't evaluate the grip because it is the first season and I didn't make as many km as usually.
Poprawiona i bardziej naturalna wersja po angielsku:
I had to buy new tyres because the Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 had quality issues. The Hankooks generated vibrations and had radial runout problems. After reading many positive reviews and test results, I decided to buy the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ in size 225/45 R17.
I used these tyres for one season and had the opportunity to test them in all conditions, because this winter in Poland was very snowy and cold. The tyres are very quiet - even quieter than my summer Falken FK520 tyres.
The grip on dry and wet roads is great, and the tyres are very comfortable. The build quality is also excellent. Because of my bad experiences with Falken and Hankook, I decided to check the tyres using a Hunter Road Force test, and the results were impressive: 25 N, 10 N, and 5 N. One tyre performed worse because it had rubber residues from production and showed 85 N, but I was informed that the issue would disappear after some driving - and it did.
I am very satisfied with these tyres. I almost forgot to mention the snow and ice performance, which was also very good. On ice, usually only studded tyres provide perfect grip, but during this winter I had no issues with traction or handling. Well done, Kumho.
I didn’t evaluate tread wear yet because this was only the first season and I haven’t driven as many kilometres as usual.

17
17***@noreg.com
Volvo V60 T6 AWD · 235/45 R17 · 8 047 km
★★★★☆

Great tyres for the cost, transforms car in winter with great grip, water shedding and ride comfort

CO
co***@geekoland.fr
MG HS · 225/55 R19 · 8 047 km
★★★★★

Comparing the brands like Continental, Bridgestone, Hankook, Michelin, we are very impressed by the progression of Kumho. The wp52+ tested in France in the Vosges and in the city is impressive. Tire and report quality price incomparable.

VA
va***@gmail.com
BMW 530i · 245/45 R18 · 1 609 km
★★★★☆

Mounted these this season on my BMW 530i xDrive, and after a few hundred kilometers of mixed driving, including mountain roads with tight hairpins, wet tarmac, and temperatures between 3–5°C, I’m genuinely impressed. With all driver aids turned off, the grip was annoyingly good; no matter how much I tried to unsettle the car, it simply stuck to the road.
Coming from Continental run-flats, the comfort improvement is immediately noticeable. The ride feels more compliant, and surprisingly, the road noise is minimal barely distinguishable from my summer Michelin Primacy 3s. That was an unexpected bonus.
As for fuel consumption, I can’t make a direct comparison since my winter setup is 245/45 R18 all around, while summer is 245 front / 275 rear on 19-inch wheels. Still, the overall consumption seems similar.
So far, the WP52+ have been flawless in all conditions tested wet grip, handling, comfort, and noise are top-notch. I’ll post an update once I’ve had the chance to test them on snow and ice, but as it stands, Kumho really nailed it with this tire.

IV
iv***@gmail.com
BMW 320d touring · 205/55 R16 · 3 219 km
★★★★☆

Best deal ever!
Tyres are premium feel, Class A wet grip, drive like a german tyre on a BMW Touring 320D. Made in Korea.
The only other Class A wet grip tyre is Bridgestone, with $55 more per tyre.
Kumho is the top-brand of the corporation, the budget version is Marshall.

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in