20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 490 000+ prices tracked
Eco
Michelin Premium

ENERGY SAVER

PTI – Pneutesty Index No PTI yet
only 1 test
Price from
38 148 Ft
in 175/65 R15
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
↑

For a more accurate search, please enter your size — select the width, profile and rim diameter above.

Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Select a size and we'll compare prices across shops.

Rating and verdict

How the Energy Saver evaluated

PTI – Pneutesty Index No PTI yet We give PTI only from 2 independent tests – one test can be a coincidence. This tyre has 1 so far.
only 1 test incomplete measurement: comfort from noise only last test 2018

Customer reviews are not part of PTI – PTI is based solely on measurements from independent tests.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🌿
Lowest consumption low rolling resistance
🏙
Ideal for the city quiet and efficient
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

38 148 Ft ÷ 53 337 km × 100
72 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 175/65 R15 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Eco

Economy tyres are built around low rolling resistance — the engine spends less effort keeping the wheel turning, and that shows up at the pump. Michelin ENERGY SAVER is one of them. The price is usually a harder compound: on a wet road you need to brake earlier and carry more margin into corners. In return they cover more kilometres than softer compounds. Leading manufacturers keep narrowing the wet-grip gap with new compounds, but a difference between an economy and a standard tyre is normally still there.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Manufacturer Michelin
Tread ENERGY SAVER
Season Summer
Vehicle type Passenger car
Focus Eco
Construction Radial
Creation date 18.03.2018
Product launch date (gen.) 01.01.2010
Available technologies

Select a size to display technologies.

Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Michelin ENERGY SAVER.
New

Successor to the model you are viewing

The tyre you are viewing already has a successor. We recommend choosing the more advanced model:

Price history

How the price has evolved

Select a size and we'll show how its price has evolved.

User reviews

What owners say

3,6
★★★★☆
from 40 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
53 337 km
Reliability:confidence-high
AJ
aj***@live.com
Toyota Prius III · 195/65 R15 · 144 841 km
★★★★☆

Good tyres. The rear tyres on my Prius 3 plug-in (2012) are still the original ones. They are not yet worn down to the wear indicator mark but are showing superficial cracking. So i just decided to replace them after 145k (90k UK miles) kilometres and 11 years. Ridiculous mileage for a set of tyres. The front tyres have been replaced after 7 years and unknown (for me) km's. The front tyres were replaced with energy saver again in 2019. Now they are nearing the wear indicator mark so i am replacing them together with the back tyres for a full new set.
I will not be buying them again as they are no longer for sale. I am buying all season tyres instead since the performance of this type of tyre has improved by a lot over the years.
It's important to know that i drive with a large focus on fuel efficiency. I try to avoid braking hard since i use regenerative braking as much as possible, just as long as i am not annoying other traffic. I don't have the adequate knowledge (or experience with other tyres) to fill in most of the scores in step 2, other than that they behaved very well. There is nothing noteworthy exept for the -in my opinion- extreme wear resistance and low rolling resistance.

ZE
ze***@gmail.com
Hyundai i20 · 185/65 R15 · 69 524 km
★★★★☆

The tyres came with the car, after 7 years of use and 69500Km (43200 miles) they started to show signs of dry rubber from the wear itself whey would probably last for more than 100000Km (62000 miles), the car was not parked in a garage, but at a relatively sheltered and covered location, for my drive style these are perfect.
On the dry they are perfectly fine, on the wet they never gave me any scares or surprises. When being pushed they don't give away the grip suddenly making them quite predictable.
Being 185/65R15 the comfort is quite good, but road feedback is quite tame, you can feel if they are gripping well, but they are quite cushioned.
I often drive in highway and, while I don't have a comparison, I believe that they helped quite a lot in the fuel consumption, time will tell if the replacements will achieve such consumption.
I replace them with what was available at a reasonable price, sadly these are not longer available and their replacement, the Energy Saver Plus, are not easily available and are really expensive, Primacy 4 are somewhat expensive as well, in the end I went for the Continental UltraContact UC6 as they were quite cheap (when compared with the previous alternatives) and well regarded, hopefully these will last at least 50000Km.

ER
er***@yandex.com
Fiat Qubo · 185/65 R15 · 41 843 km
★★★★☆

This tire came with stock. I used 4 years 45000km. Threads not wear to much, however after 3 years it is started crack on sides. And after 3 years it started tearing teeths. My last trip, over 2000km it is cracked on threads. Same things happened my father’s car too. So, nice tire but not long last. I order Crossclimate 2 for replacement. I am thinking not use anymore my Blizzak for winter.

LU
lu***@gmail.com
Skoda · 205/55 R16 · 104 607 km
★★★☆☆

OE tyres on Skoda Superb Combi 2015 1.6 TDi GreenLine.
Tyres had a long lifespan, and performed ok, but a lot of that is overshadowed by the dry rotting that these Michelins have.
To make matters worse, the left front tyre got a broken belt in the middle of the thread! Very dangerous stuff! Btw the dot code was from 2014 and this happened in 2020.
I don't like to recommend these, although this is a old tyre replaced by the Energy Saver +, which in turn have kind of been replaced by the e.Primacy. The ES+ is still made in some smaller sizes, but I dont recommend buying them.

BO
bo***@hotmail.co.uk
Volkswagen · 205/55 R16 · 33 796 km
★☆☆☆☆

The Energy Saver tyre has one significant weak link - poor wet grip. When pulling out onto wet roundabouts or T junctions, I experience very poor grip which is quite concerning at times. In dry conditions the tyre is great and very long lasting. We have done 21k miles and the tyre is now at 3mm. I can't stand them any more so swapping now.

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in