19 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 120+ tests 280 000+ prices tracked
Eco
Michelin Premium

ENERGY SAVER+

Price from
30 340 Ft
in 175/65 R14
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Your size 175/65 R14 Speed / Load: 82H XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB Price from 30 340 Ft
View prices →
Your size 175/65 R14 Speed / Load: 82T XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB Price from 31 605 Ft
Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Current prices for size 175/65 R14.

Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.

Rating and verdict

How the Energy Saver Plus evaluated

Skóre vychádza z 62 recenzií vodičov. ?

8.2
Overall score · / 10
🏆 Trophies from tests calculated from 14 tests
Test winner
Test winner
Top 3
Top 3 placement in the test
✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🌿
Lowest consumption low rolling resistance
🏙
Ideal for the city quiet and efficient

Kde stojí Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ v rozmere 175/65 R14

Porovnané s 36 pneumatikami v tomto rozmere — rovnaká sezóna a podobné zameranie. Všetky sú v ponuke a majú výsledky z nezávislých testov.

najslabšianajlepšia
Táto pneumatika 8,2 30 340 Ft
Kumho HS52 ECSTA 9.0 41 962 Ft Hankook H750 Kinergy 4S 2 8.9 46 989 Ft Continental ULTRACONTACT 8.5 29 836 Ft lepšia a lacnejšia Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 8.5 31 525 Ft Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ 8.2 30 340 Ft Táto pneumatika Yokohama ES32 8.2 21 920 Ft Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 8.1 Nexen N'BLUE S 8.1 21 802 Ft Sava INTENSA HP 7.9 20 961 Ft Vredestein T-TRAC 2 7.7 18 769 Ft Hankook K435 KINERGY ECO2 7.7 22 253 Ft Falken SINCERA SN110 7.7 23 793 Ft Continental CONTIECOCONTACT 5 7.7 33 727 Ft Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 7.6 18 252 Ft Pirelli CINTURATO P1 7.6 27 714 Ft Kumho ECOWING ES31 7.5 17 962 Ft Continental ECOCONTACT 6 7.5 31 380 Ft Uniroyal RAINEXPERT 5 7.5 23 015 Ft Continental ContiPremiumContact 2 7.5 Fulda ECOCONTROL 7.3 20 034 Ft Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP COMPACT 7.3 Barum VANIS 3 7.2 27 026 Ft Cooper SUMMER 7.1 18 889 Ft Uniroyal RAINEXPERT 3 7.1 27 714 Ft Nexen Ro-ct8 7.1 28 835 Ft Goodride ZUPERECO Z-107 6.7 23 830 Ft Sailun ATREZZO ECO (SH31) 6.7 15 798 Ft Radar RIVERA PRO-2 6.7 Matador MP47 HECTORRA 3 6.7 RoadX RXMOTION H11 6.5 14 751 Ft Firestone MULTIHAWK 2 6.5 23 550 Ft Matador HECTORRA 5 6.2 19 713 Ft Petlas ELEGANT PT311 6.2 22 877 Ft Sava PERFECTA 5.8 22 253 Ft Minerva 209 5.5 24 995 Ft Arivo PREMIO ARZERO 3.6 22 540 Ft
3,6 medián 7,5 9,0
5. poradie v skupine z 36 porovnávaných
83 % pneumatík je slabších v tejto skupine
+0,7 nad mediánom skupiny medián skupiny 7,5
−0,8 na najlepšiu v skupine najlepšia má 9,0
💡 Za menej peňazí lepšie hodnotenie V tejto skupine je 1 pneumatika, ktorá má lepšie skóre a zároveň je lacnejšia.
Zobraziť všetky pneumatiky v rebríčku (36)
  1. 1. 9.0 Kumho HS52 ECSTA 41 962 Ft +11 622 Ft
  2. 2. 8.9 Hankook H750 Kinergy 4S 2 46 989 Ft +16 648 Ft
  3. 3. 8.5 Continental ULTRACONTACT lepšia a lacnejšia 29 836 Ft −504 Ft
  4. 3. 8.5 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 31 525 Ft +1 185 Ft
  5. 5. 8.2 Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ Táto pneumatika 30 340 Ft
  6. 5. 8.2 Yokohama ES32 21 920 Ft −8 420 Ft
  7. 7. 8.1 Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE
  8. 7. 8.1 Nexen N'BLUE S 21 802 Ft −8 538 Ft
  9. 9. 7.9 Sava INTENSA HP 20 961 Ft −9 379 Ft
  10. 10. 7.7 Vredestein T-TRAC 2 18 769 Ft −11 571 Ft
  11. 10. 7.7 Hankook K435 KINERGY ECO2 22 253 Ft −8 087 Ft
  12. 10. 7.7 Falken SINCERA SN110 23 793 Ft −6 547 Ft
  13. 10. 7.7 Continental CONTIECOCONTACT 5 33 727 Ft +3 387 Ft
  14. 14. 7.6 Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 18 252 Ft −12 088 Ft
  15. 14. 7.6 Pirelli CINTURATO P1 27 714 Ft −2 626 Ft
  16. 16. 7.5 Kumho ECOWING ES31 17 962 Ft −12 379 Ft
  17. 16. 7.5 Continental ECOCONTACT 6 31 380 Ft +1 040 Ft
  18. 16. 7.5 Uniroyal RAINEXPERT 5 23 015 Ft −7 325 Ft
  19. 16. 7.5 Continental ContiPremiumContact 2
  20. 20. 7.3 Fulda ECOCONTROL 20 034 Ft −10 306 Ft
  21. 20. 7.3 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP COMPACT
  22. 22. 7.2 Barum VANIS 3 27 026 Ft −3 315 Ft
  23. 23. 7.1 Cooper SUMMER 18 889 Ft −11 452 Ft
  24. 23. 7.1 Uniroyal RAINEXPERT 3 27 714 Ft −2 626 Ft
  25. 23. 7.1 Nexen Ro-ct8 28 835 Ft −1 505 Ft
  26. 26. 6.7 Goodride ZUPERECO Z-107 23 830 Ft −6 510 Ft
  27. 26. 6.7 Sailun ATREZZO ECO (SH31) 15 798 Ft −14 543 Ft
  28. 26. 6.7 Radar RIVERA PRO-2
  29. 26. 6.7 Matador MP47 HECTORRA 3
  30. 30. 6.5 RoadX RXMOTION H11 14 751 Ft −15 589 Ft
  31. 30. 6.5 Firestone MULTIHAWK 2 23 550 Ft −6 791 Ft
  32. 32. 6.2 Matador HECTORRA 5 19 713 Ft −10 627 Ft
  33. 32. 6.2 Petlas ELEGANT PT311 22 877 Ft −7 464 Ft
  34. 34. 5.8 Sava PERFECTA 22 253 Ft −8 087 Ft
  35. 35. 5.5 Minerva 209 24 995 Ft −5 345 Ft
  36. 36. 3.6 Arivo PREMIO ARZERO 22 540 Ft −7 800 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

30 340 Ft ÷ 70 811 km × 100
43 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 175/65 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Eco

Economy tyres are built around low rolling resistance — the engine spends less effort keeping the wheel turning, and that shows up at the pump. Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ is one of them. The price is usually a harder compound: on a wet road you need to brake earlier and carry more margin into corners. In return they cover more kilometres than softer compounds. Leading manufacturers keep narrowing the wet-grip gap with new compounds, but a difference between an economy and a standard tyre is normally still there.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 175/65 R14
Width175 mm
Profile height65 %
Rim diameter14″
Load index (LI)82
Speed index (SI)H
Product code931235
EAN3528709312356
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB (68 dB)
Manufacturer Michelin
Tread ENERGY SAVER+
Season Summer
Vehicle type Passenger car
Focus Eco
Construction Radial
Creation date 18.03.2018
Product launch date (gen.) 23.10.2014
Available technologies

No technologies are listed for this size.

Comparison

Konkurencia

Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.

Select a tyre to compare with Michelin ENERGY SAVER+.
Compare →
Continental ContiEcoContact 3
Continental
ContiEcoContact 3
7.9
This tyre
Michelin ENERGY SAVER+
Michelin
ENERGY SAVER+
8.2
from 30 340 Ft
Reference tyre
Compare →
Continental CONTIECOCONTACT 5
Continental
CONTIECOCONTACT 5
7.7
Novinka

Nástupca prezeraného modelu

Pneumatika, ktorú si práve pozeráte, už má nástupcu. Odporúčame zvoliť technologicky vyspelejší model:

Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 175/65 R14.

Current lowest
30 340,30 Ft
↗ 39 622,83 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
76,23 Ft
15.9.2026
Highest for the period
30 340,30 Ft
23.9.2026
30 340,30 76,23 30 340,30 Ft 22.6.2026 23.9.2026 22.6.2026: 76,38 Ft 21.8.2026: 77,49 Ft 1.9.2026: 84,01 Ft 1.9.2026: 84,20 Ft 2.9.2026: 84,01 Ft 4.9.2026: 83,82 Ft 5.9.2026: 85,74 Ft 5.9.2026: 87,61 Ft 7.9.2026: 85,74 Ft 12.9.2026: 87,53 Ft 14.9.2026: 85,74 Ft 15.9.2026: 76,23 Ft 21.9.2026: 77,75 Ft 23.9.2026: 30 340,30 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

3,8
★★★★☆
z 26 recenzií
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
70 811 km
Reliability:confidence-medium
AR
ar***@gmail.com
Chevrolet Lacetti · 185/60 R14 · 56 327 km
★★★★★

I had the opportunity to buy and drive one back in 2012 when it first came out. It has a good ride on both dry and wet roads. It's comfortable on long trips (1,000+ miles) and durable. It's quiet at speeds above 80 mph. It's a very good ownership experience.

PO
po***@gmail.com
Volkswagen Golf · 195/55 R15 · 16 093 km
★★★★☆

In past 4 years, I had a two sets of Michelin Energy Saver+
First one I had from april to november of 2021, I bought a used set of 4 for only 30 Eur, three tyres were manufactured in 2017 and one in 2018. They were 185/65 R15, two had about 3-4 mm and other two about 5-6 mm tread depth left. I just needed something cheap, for one season on a cheap daily car, because car was on some 20 years old Bridgestone's. So 5 years old Michelin's for 30 Eur, in that case, looked like a far better option.
Second one was bought in early spring of 2023, I have it and use it until this day. Second set are 195/55 R15. I bought a full set for 120 Eur, tyres were made in Poland, was with around 6.5-7 mm tread depth, and without any signs of previous repairs. All in all - looked like a great choice, because for that price, I couldn't buy even any of the cheapest sets. Brand new Michelin Energy Saver+ in this size was around 140 Eur per tyre or around 550€ per set. So 120 Eur for a set of used, but great condition premium tyres? Just perfect.
Dry - they are great for dry roads, feels stable, have plenty of grip.
Wet - I use them more carefully on wet roads, especially after reading tyre tests and people reviews that they are a little weaker in the wet. But in my experience there wasn't any unpleasant moments or aquaplaning on wet roads, even with quite low tread depth (on first set, rear tyres had only about 2-3 mm tread depth left, when I removed them in autumn to replace summer wheels with a winter wheels set), maybe because of precautions and calm driving when raining outside.
Road feedback - knowing fact, that they aren't oriented for super sharp or sporty driving and they are just a premium touring tyres - feedback is good enough.
Handling - is great on dry roads, on wet roads I use tyres more carefully, especially carefully was used a first set with quite low tread depth, but still - handling was safe enough even in wet conditions.
Wear - I would say it's 10/10, but I had experience with a two different sets, so more deeply:
● First set of tyres were 185/65 R15, DOT 2017-2018, had only 3-4 mm tread depth on rear and 5-6 mm on front, but after full summer season and about 8000 km - it was still about 2-3 mm tread depth left on the rear and about 4-5 mm left on the front, that was a late autumn of 2021 and tyres were manufactured in 2017 (one tyre in 2018, I guess one, from original set, was damaged unrepairable, so previous owner bought one new tyre to complete a set), and 3 of 4 were started to show some cracks on sidewalls. Front ones was still usable, but I decided not use any of them at all.
● Second set of tyres were bought used too, 195/55 R15, DOT 2020, made in Poland, all tyres had around 6.5-7 mm tread depth when I bought them in march of 2023. After two seasons and around 15'000 km I measured tread depth of them a month ago and there are still around 5-5.5 mm left. Because they are assimetric, I rotate them after every summer season, I pick two (with more tread depth) for front axle and two (with less tread depth) for rear axle, I have found that this method works out best to achieve even wear, because front tyres on FWD cars, even without any wheel spins, wears out a little bit quicker. Tyres are more than a 4 years old now, but I can't see any noticable signs of cracking, so I will continue using them in the future summers.
Comfort - how it was on my first set, it's same and on my second set - they were and they are very quiet and not too hard, I should say - well balanced in terms of hardness and quite comfortable overall.
In my experience - tyres are great in dry, good enough in wet, predictible in handling and gives enough road feedback, also very long lasting and not noisy at all. I bought my first set quite accidently and didn't knew what to expect from them, but even 5 years old used tyres - were very comfortable, very quiet and quite good overall. So, when I saw my second set, which was only slightly more than 2 years old, with tread depth of almost a new tyre - I knew that they will be even more perfect. And honestly - those Michelin's were (and still are) greatest summer tyres, that I had in my entire life.
P.S. don't forget to wash your wheels regularly.

KW
kw***@gmail.com
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5 · 205/60 R16 · 24 140 km
★★★☆☆

Very dangerous on wet roads. Lost control because of aquaplaning while driving with normal speed on a relative open corner of a mountain road, resulting to a light crash thanks to the low speed I was driving in that occasion. The tires are about 50% of their initial tread depth. Most of the tires I have used would have made the corner easily at a considerably higher speed, but unfortunately Michelin's Energy Saver Plus failed in the most ridiculous way!
It's behavior, while good on dry roads, is really unpredictable on wet.
A real disgrace for Michelin. Avoid it at all costs if you drive on wet roads, for your own safety!

IO
io***@hotmail.com
Toyota Corolla · 175/65 R14 · 14 484 km
★★★★☆

Very good tyres in wet and dry roads. Low noise and very comfort.

LU
lu***@gmail.com
Citroën C3 · 195/55 R16 · 88 514 km
★★★☆☆

OE on a 2015 Citroën C3 1.2 PureTech.
Not the best Michelins imo
The big problem with these is the dry rotting of the whole tyre. It's pretty bad.
Grip is normal, as expected from a Michelin.
I can't recommend them because of the dry rotting problem.

Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?

Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.

Sign in