Michelin Premium ENERGY SAVER+
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.
Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.
Price comparison across shops
Current prices for size 175/65 R14.
Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.
How the Energy Saver Plus evaluated
Skóre vychádza z 62 recenzií vodičov. ?
Kde stojí Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ v rozmere 175/65 R14
Porovnané s 36 pneumatikami v tomto rozmere — rovnaká sezóna a podobné zameranie. Všetky sú v ponuke a majú výsledky z nezávislých testov.
Kumho HS52 ECSTA 9.0 41 962 Ft
Hankook H750 Kinergy 4S 2 8.9 46 989 Ft
Continental ULTRACONTACT 8.5 29 836 Ft lepšia a lacnejšia
Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 8.5 31 525 Ft
Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ 8.2 30 340 Ft Táto pneumatika
Yokohama ES32 8.2 21 920 Ft
Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 8.1
Nexen N'BLUE S 8.1 21 802 Ft
Sava INTENSA HP 7.9 20 961 Ft
Vredestein T-TRAC 2 7.7 18 769 Ft
Hankook K435 KINERGY ECO2 7.7 22 253 Ft
Falken SINCERA SN110 7.7 23 793 Ft
Continental CONTIECOCONTACT 5 7.7 33 727 Ft
Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 7.6 18 252 Ft
Pirelli CINTURATO P1 7.6 27 714 Ft
Kumho ECOWING ES31 7.5 17 962 Ft
Continental ECOCONTACT 6 7.5 31 380 Ft
Uniroyal RAINEXPERT 5 7.5 23 015 Ft
Continental ContiPremiumContact 2 7.5
Fulda ECOCONTROL 7.3 20 034 Ft
Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP COMPACT 7.3
Barum VANIS 3 7.2 27 026 Ft
Cooper SUMMER 7.1 18 889 Ft
Uniroyal RAINEXPERT 3 7.1 27 714 Ft
Nexen Ro-ct8 7.1 28 835 Ft
Goodride ZUPERECO Z-107 6.7 23 830 Ft
Sailun ATREZZO ECO (SH31) 6.7 15 798 Ft
Radar RIVERA PRO-2 6.7
Matador MP47 HECTORRA 3 6.7
RoadX RXMOTION H11 6.5 14 751 Ft
Firestone MULTIHAWK 2 6.5 23 550 Ft
Matador HECTORRA 5 6.2 19 713 Ft
Petlas ELEGANT PT311 6.2 22 877 Ft
Sava PERFECTA 5.8 22 253 Ft
Minerva 209 5.5 24 995 Ft
Arivo PREMIO ARZERO 3.6 22 540 Ft Zobraziť všetky pneumatiky v rebríčku (36)
- 1. 9.0 41 962 Ft +11 622 Ft
- 2. 8.9 46 989 Ft +16 648 Ft
- 3. 8.5 29 836 Ft −504 Ft
- 3. 8.5 31 525 Ft +1 185 Ft
- 5. 8.2 30 340 Ft
- 5. 8.2 21 920 Ft −8 420 Ft
- 7. 8.1
- 7. 8.1 21 802 Ft −8 538 Ft
- 9. 7.9 20 961 Ft −9 379 Ft
- 10. 7.7 18 769 Ft −11 571 Ft
- 10. 7.7 22 253 Ft −8 087 Ft
- 10. 7.7 23 793 Ft −6 547 Ft
- 10. 7.7 33 727 Ft +3 387 Ft
- 14. 7.6 18 252 Ft −12 088 Ft
- 14. 7.6 27 714 Ft −2 626 Ft
- 16. 7.5 17 962 Ft −12 379 Ft
- 16. 7.5 31 380 Ft +1 040 Ft
- 16. 7.5 23 015 Ft −7 325 Ft
- 16. 7.5
- 20. 7.3 20 034 Ft −10 306 Ft
- 20. 7.3
- 22. 7.2 27 026 Ft −3 315 Ft
- 23. 7.1 18 889 Ft −11 452 Ft
- 23. 7.1 27 714 Ft −2 626 Ft
- 23. 7.1 28 835 Ft −1 505 Ft
- 26. 6.7 23 830 Ft −6 510 Ft
- 26. 6.7 15 798 Ft −14 543 Ft
- 26. 6.7
- 26. 6.7
- 30. 6.5 14 751 Ft −15 589 Ft
- 30. 6.5 23 550 Ft −6 791 Ft
- 32. 6.2 19 713 Ft −10 627 Ft
- 32. 6.2 22 877 Ft −7 464 Ft
- 34. 5.8 22 253 Ft −8 087 Ft
- 35. 5.5 24 995 Ft −5 345 Ft
- 36. 3.6 22 540 Ft −7 800 Ft
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 175/65 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Technical information
Focus: Eco
Economy tyres are built around low rolling resistance — the engine spends less effort keeping the wheel turning, and that shows up at the pump. Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ is one of them. The price is usually a harder compound: on a wet road you need to brake earlier and carry more margin into corners. In return they cover more kilometres than softer compounds. Leading manufacturers keep narrowing the wet-grip gap with new compounds, but a difference between an economy and a standard tyre is normally still there.
No technologies are listed for this size.
Konkurencia
Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.
Nástupca prezeraného modelu
Pneumatika, ktorú si práve pozeráte, už má nástupcu. Odporúčame zvoliť technologicky vyspelejší model:
How the price has evolved
Lowest price across shops for size 175/65 R14.
The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.
What owners say
I had the opportunity to buy and drive one back in 2012 when it first came out. It has a good ride on both dry and wet roads. It's comfortable on long trips (1,000+ miles) and durable. It's quiet at speeds above 80 mph. It's a very good ownership experience.
In past 4 years, I had a two sets of Michelin Energy Saver+
First one I had from april to november of 2021, I bought a used set of 4 for only 30 Eur, three tyres were manufactured in 2017 and one in 2018. They were 185/65 R15, two had about 3-4 mm and other two about 5-6 mm tread depth left. I just needed something cheap, for one season on a cheap daily car, because car was on some 20 years old Bridgestone's. So 5 years old Michelin's for 30 Eur, in that case, looked like a far better option.
Second one was bought in early spring of 2023, I have it and use it until this day. Second set are 195/55 R15. I bought a full set for 120 Eur, tyres were made in Poland, was with around 6.5-7 mm tread depth, and without any signs of previous repairs. All in all - looked like a great choice, because for that price, I couldn't buy even any of the cheapest sets. Brand new Michelin Energy Saver+ in this size was around 140 Eur per tyre or around 550€ per set. So 120 Eur for a set of used, but great condition premium tyres? Just perfect.
Dry - they are great for dry roads, feels stable, have plenty of grip.
Wet - I use them more carefully on wet roads, especially after reading tyre tests and people reviews that they are a little weaker in the wet. But in my experience there wasn't any unpleasant moments or aquaplaning on wet roads, even with quite low tread depth (on first set, rear tyres had only about 2-3 mm tread depth left, when I removed them in autumn to replace summer wheels with a winter wheels set), maybe because of precautions and calm driving when raining outside.
Road feedback - knowing fact, that they aren't oriented for super sharp or sporty driving and they are just a premium touring tyres - feedback is good enough.
Handling - is great on dry roads, on wet roads I use tyres more carefully, especially carefully was used a first set with quite low tread depth, but still - handling was safe enough even in wet conditions.
Wear - I would say it's 10/10, but I had experience with a two different sets, so more deeply:
● First set of tyres were 185/65 R15, DOT 2017-2018, had only 3-4 mm tread depth on rear and 5-6 mm on front, but after full summer season and about 8000 km - it was still about 2-3 mm tread depth left on the rear and about 4-5 mm left on the front, that was a late autumn of 2021 and tyres were manufactured in 2017 (one tyre in 2018, I guess one, from original set, was damaged unrepairable, so previous owner bought one new tyre to complete a set), and 3 of 4 were started to show some cracks on sidewalls. Front ones was still usable, but I decided not use any of them at all.
● Second set of tyres were bought used too, 195/55 R15, DOT 2020, made in Poland, all tyres had around 6.5-7 mm tread depth when I bought them in march of 2023. After two seasons and around 15'000 km I measured tread depth of them a month ago and there are still around 5-5.5 mm left. Because they are assimetric, I rotate them after every summer season, I pick two (with more tread depth) for front axle and two (with less tread depth) for rear axle, I have found that this method works out best to achieve even wear, because front tyres on FWD cars, even without any wheel spins, wears out a little bit quicker. Tyres are more than a 4 years old now, but I can't see any noticable signs of cracking, so I will continue using them in the future summers.
Comfort - how it was on my first set, it's same and on my second set - they were and they are very quiet and not too hard, I should say - well balanced in terms of hardness and quite comfortable overall.
In my experience - tyres are great in dry, good enough in wet, predictible in handling and gives enough road feedback, also very long lasting and not noisy at all. I bought my first set quite accidently and didn't knew what to expect from them, but even 5 years old used tyres - were very comfortable, very quiet and quite good overall. So, when I saw my second set, which was only slightly more than 2 years old, with tread depth of almost a new tyre - I knew that they will be even more perfect. And honestly - those Michelin's were (and still are) greatest summer tyres, that I had in my entire life.
P.S. don't forget to wash your wheels regularly.
Very dangerous on wet roads. Lost control because of aquaplaning while driving with normal speed on a relative open corner of a mountain road, resulting to a light crash thanks to the low speed I was driving in that occasion. The tires are about 50% of their initial tread depth. Most of the tires I have used would have made the corner easily at a considerably higher speed, but unfortunately Michelin's Energy Saver Plus failed in the most ridiculous way!
It's behavior, while good on dry roads, is really unpredictable on wet.
A real disgrace for Michelin. Avoid it at all costs if you drive on wet roads, for your own safety!
Very good tyres in wet and dry roads. Low noise and very comfort.
OE on a 2015 Citroën C3 1.2 PureTech.
Not the best Michelins imo
The big problem with these is the dry rotting of the whole tyre. It's pretty bad.
Grip is normal, as expected from a Michelin.
I can't recommend them because of the dry rotting problem.
Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?
Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.
Sign in