19 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 120+ tests 280 000+ prices tracked
Eco
Michelin Premium

ENERGY SAVER+

Price from
35 136 Ft
in 165/70 R14
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Your size 165/70 R14 Speed / Load: 81T XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB Price from 35 136 Ft
View prices →
Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Current prices for size 165/70 R14.

Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.

Rating and verdict

How the Energy Saver Plus evaluated

Skóre vychádza z 62 recenzií vodičov. ?

8.2
Overall score · / 10
🏆 Trophies from tests calculated from 14 tests
Test winner
Test winner
Top 3
Top 3 placement in the test
✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🌿
Lowest consumption low rolling resistance
🏙
Ideal for the city quiet and efficient

Kde stojí Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ v rozmere 165/70 R14

Porovnané s 35 pneumatikami v tomto rozmere — rovnaká sezóna a podobné zameranie. Všetky sú v ponuke a majú výsledky z nezávislých testov.

najslabšianajlepšia
Táto pneumatika 8,2 35 136 Ft
Continental ULTRACONTACT 8.5 32 057 Ft lepšia a lacnejšia Dunlop STREET RESPONSE 2 8.2 Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ 8.2 35 136 Ft Táto pneumatika Nokian Tyres iLine 8.2 Yokohama ES32 8.2 23 171 Ft Nexen N'BLUE S 8.1 20 566 Ft Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 8.1 Hankook K435 KINERGY ECO2 7.7 22 974 Ft Vredestein T-TRAC 2 7.7 22 774 Ft Falken SINCERA SN110 7.7 22 614 Ft Continental CONTIECOCONTACT 5 7.7 32 700 Ft Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 7.6 18 571 Ft Kumho ECOWING ES31 7.5 18 913 Ft Uniroyal RAINEXPERT 5 7.5 24 406 Ft Goodyear Duragrip 7.5 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE-50 7.4 Fulda ECOCONTROL 7.3 29 305 Ft Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP COMPACT 7.3 Hankook K425 KINERGY ECO 7.3 Giti GITISYNERGY H2 7.2 18 753 Ft Cooper SUMMER 7.1 19 418 Ft Nexen Ro-ct8 7.1 29 042 Ft Matador MP47 HECTORRA 3 6.7 Sailun ATREZZO ECO 6.7 19 298 Ft Linglong GREENMAX 6.6 RoadX H11 RXMotion 6.5 12 013 Ft Firestone MULTIHAWK 2 6.5 Barum BRAVURIS 5HM 6.3 25 171 Ft Matador HECTORRA 5 6.2 19 395 Ft Bridgestone B250 6.2 Petlas ELEGANT PT311 6.2 22 211 Ft Leao NOVA-FORCE HP100 6.2 21 284 Ft Sava PERFECTA 5.8 21 232 Ft Dunlop ECONODRIVE 5.8 Arivo PREMIO ARZERO 3.6 15 550 Ft
3,6 medián 7,3 8,5
2. poradie v skupine z 35 porovnávaných
86 % pneumatík je slabších v tejto skupine
+0,9 nad mediánom skupiny medián skupiny 7,3
−0,3 na najlepšiu v skupine najlepšia má 8,5
💡 Za menej peňazí lepšie hodnotenie V tejto skupine je 1 pneumatika, ktorá má lepšie skóre a zároveň je lacnejšia.
Zobraziť všetky pneumatiky v rebríčku (35)
  1. 1. 8.5 Continental ULTRACONTACT lepšia a lacnejšia 32 057 Ft −3 078 Ft
  2. 2. 8.2 Dunlop STREET RESPONSE 2
  3. 2. 8.2 Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ Táto pneumatika 35 136 Ft
  4. 2. 8.2 Nokian Tyres iLine
  5. 2. 8.2 Yokohama ES32 23 171 Ft −11 965 Ft
  6. 6. 8.1 Nexen N'BLUE S 20 566 Ft −14 569 Ft
  7. 6. 8.1 Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE
  8. 8. 7.7 Hankook K435 KINERGY ECO2 22 974 Ft −12 162 Ft
  9. 8. 7.7 Vredestein T-TRAC 2 22 774 Ft −12 362 Ft
  10. 8. 7.7 Falken SINCERA SN110 22 614 Ft −12 522 Ft
  11. 8. 7.7 Continental CONTIECOCONTACT 5 32 700 Ft −2 436 Ft
  12. 12. 7.6 Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 18 571 Ft −16 565 Ft
  13. 13. 7.5 Kumho ECOWING ES31 18 913 Ft −16 223 Ft
  14. 13. 7.5 Uniroyal RAINEXPERT 5 24 406 Ft −10 730 Ft
  15. 13. 7.5 Goodyear Duragrip
  16. 16. 7.4 Yokohama BLUEARTH-A AE-50
  17. 17. 7.3 Fulda ECOCONTROL 29 305 Ft −5 831 Ft
  18. 17. 7.3 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP COMPACT
  19. 17. 7.3 Hankook K425 KINERGY ECO
  20. 20. 7.2 Giti GITISYNERGY H2 18 753 Ft −16 383 Ft
  21. 21. 7.1 Cooper SUMMER 19 418 Ft −15 718 Ft
  22. 21. 7.1 Nexen Ro-ct8 29 042 Ft −6 093 Ft
  23. 23. 6.7 Matador MP47 HECTORRA 3
  24. 23. 6.7 Sailun ATREZZO ECO 19 298 Ft −15 838 Ft
  25. 25. 6.6 Linglong GREENMAX
  26. 26. 6.5 RoadX H11 RXMotion 12 013 Ft −23 123 Ft
  27. 26. 6.5 Firestone MULTIHAWK 2
  28. 28. 6.3 Barum BRAVURIS 5HM 25 171 Ft −9 964 Ft
  29. 29. 6.2 Matador HECTORRA 5 19 395 Ft −15 740 Ft
  30. 29. 6.2 Bridgestone B250
  31. 29. 6.2 Petlas ELEGANT PT311 22 211 Ft −12 925 Ft
  32. 29. 6.2 Leao NOVA-FORCE HP100 21 284 Ft −13 852 Ft
  33. 33. 5.8 Sava PERFECTA 21 232 Ft −13 904 Ft
  34. 33. 5.8 Dunlop ECONODRIVE
  35. 35. 3.6 Arivo PREMIO ARZERO 15 550 Ft −19 586 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

35 136 Ft ÷ 70 811 km × 100
50 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 165/70 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ 50 Ft
Yokohama ES32 53 Ft

Spomedzi porovnávaných má Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ najnižšiu cenu na 100 km.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Eco

Economy tyres are built around low rolling resistance — the engine spends less effort keeping the wheel turning, and that shows up at the pump. Michelin ENERGY SAVER+ is one of them. The price is usually a harder compound: on a wet road you need to brake earlier and carry more margin into corners. In return they cover more kilometres than softer compounds. Leading manufacturers keep narrowing the wet-grip gap with new compounds, but a difference between an economy and a standard tyre is normally still there.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 165/70 R14
Width165 mm
Profile height70 %
Rim diameter14″
Load index (LI)81
Speed index (SI)T
Product code684057
EAN3528706840579
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB (68 dB)
Manufacturer Michelin
Tread ENERGY SAVER+
Season Summer
Vehicle type Passenger car
Focus Eco
Construction Radial
Creation date 18.03.2018
Product launch date (gen.) 23.10.2014
Available technologies

No technologies are listed for this size.

Comparison

Konkurencia

Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.

Select a tyre to compare with Michelin ENERGY SAVER+.
Compare →
Continental CONTIECOCONTACT 5
Continental
CONTIECOCONTACT 5
7.7
This tyre
Michelin ENERGY SAVER+
Michelin
ENERGY SAVER+
8.2
from 35 136 Ft
Reference tyre
Compare →
Yokohama ES32
Yokohama
ES32
8.2
from 23 171 Ft
Novinka

Nástupca prezeraného modelu

Pneumatika, ktorú si práve pozeráte, už má nástupcu. Odporúčame zvoliť technologicky vyspelejší model:

Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 165/70 R14.

Current lowest
35 135,82 Ft
↗ 45 889,29 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
75,65 Ft
25.6.2026
Highest for the period
35 135,82 Ft
23.9.2026
35 135,82 75,65 35 135,82 Ft 22.6.2026 23.9.2026 22.6.2026: 76,40 Ft 25.6.2026: 75,65 Ft 24.7.2026: 82,49 Ft 25.7.2026: 83,24 Ft 25.7.2026: 83,31 Ft 27.7.2026: 83,69 Ft 29.7.2026: 75,65 Ft 21.8.2026: 76,38 Ft 8.9.2026: 84,66 Ft 12.9.2026: 84,76 Ft 13.9.2026: 85,77 Ft 14.9.2026: 84,66 Ft 14.9.2026: 85,77 Ft 17.9.2026: 86,58 Ft 18.9.2026: 86,41 Ft 21.9.2026: 87,78 Ft 23.9.2026: 35 135,82 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

3,8
★★★★☆
z 26 recenzií
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
70 811 km
Reliability:confidence-medium
AR
ar***@gmail.com
Chevrolet Lacetti · 185/60 R14 · 56 327 km
★★★★★

I had the opportunity to buy and drive one back in 2012 when it first came out. It has a good ride on both dry and wet roads. It's comfortable on long trips (1,000+ miles) and durable. It's quiet at speeds above 80 mph. It's a very good ownership experience.

PO
po***@gmail.com
Volkswagen Golf · 195/55 R15 · 16 093 km
★★★★☆

In past 4 years, I had a two sets of Michelin Energy Saver+
First one I had from april to november of 2021, I bought a used set of 4 for only 30 Eur, three tyres were manufactured in 2017 and one in 2018. They were 185/65 R15, two had about 3-4 mm and other two about 5-6 mm tread depth left. I just needed something cheap, for one season on a cheap daily car, because car was on some 20 years old Bridgestone's. So 5 years old Michelin's for 30 Eur, in that case, looked like a far better option.
Second one was bought in early spring of 2023, I have it and use it until this day. Second set are 195/55 R15. I bought a full set for 120 Eur, tyres were made in Poland, was with around 6.5-7 mm tread depth, and without any signs of previous repairs. All in all - looked like a great choice, because for that price, I couldn't buy even any of the cheapest sets. Brand new Michelin Energy Saver+ in this size was around 140 Eur per tyre or around 550€ per set. So 120 Eur for a set of used, but great condition premium tyres? Just perfect.
Dry - they are great for dry roads, feels stable, have plenty of grip.
Wet - I use them more carefully on wet roads, especially after reading tyre tests and people reviews that they are a little weaker in the wet. But in my experience there wasn't any unpleasant moments or aquaplaning on wet roads, even with quite low tread depth (on first set, rear tyres had only about 2-3 mm tread depth left, when I removed them in autumn to replace summer wheels with a winter wheels set), maybe because of precautions and calm driving when raining outside.
Road feedback - knowing fact, that they aren't oriented for super sharp or sporty driving and they are just a premium touring tyres - feedback is good enough.
Handling - is great on dry roads, on wet roads I use tyres more carefully, especially carefully was used a first set with quite low tread depth, but still - handling was safe enough even in wet conditions.
Wear - I would say it's 10/10, but I had experience with a two different sets, so more deeply:
● First set of tyres were 185/65 R15, DOT 2017-2018, had only 3-4 mm tread depth on rear and 5-6 mm on front, but after full summer season and about 8000 km - it was still about 2-3 mm tread depth left on the rear and about 4-5 mm left on the front, that was a late autumn of 2021 and tyres were manufactured in 2017 (one tyre in 2018, I guess one, from original set, was damaged unrepairable, so previous owner bought one new tyre to complete a set), and 3 of 4 were started to show some cracks on sidewalls. Front ones was still usable, but I decided not use any of them at all.
● Second set of tyres were bought used too, 195/55 R15, DOT 2020, made in Poland, all tyres had around 6.5-7 mm tread depth when I bought them in march of 2023. After two seasons and around 15'000 km I measured tread depth of them a month ago and there are still around 5-5.5 mm left. Because they are assimetric, I rotate them after every summer season, I pick two (with more tread depth) for front axle and two (with less tread depth) for rear axle, I have found that this method works out best to achieve even wear, because front tyres on FWD cars, even without any wheel spins, wears out a little bit quicker. Tyres are more than a 4 years old now, but I can't see any noticable signs of cracking, so I will continue using them in the future summers.
Comfort - how it was on my first set, it's same and on my second set - they were and they are very quiet and not too hard, I should say - well balanced in terms of hardness and quite comfortable overall.
In my experience - tyres are great in dry, good enough in wet, predictible in handling and gives enough road feedback, also very long lasting and not noisy at all. I bought my first set quite accidently and didn't knew what to expect from them, but even 5 years old used tyres - were very comfortable, very quiet and quite good overall. So, when I saw my second set, which was only slightly more than 2 years old, with tread depth of almost a new tyre - I knew that they will be even more perfect. And honestly - those Michelin's were (and still are) greatest summer tyres, that I had in my entire life.
P.S. don't forget to wash your wheels regularly.

KW
kw***@gmail.com
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5 · 205/60 R16 · 24 140 km
★★★☆☆

Very dangerous on wet roads. Lost control because of aquaplaning while driving with normal speed on a relative open corner of a mountain road, resulting to a light crash thanks to the low speed I was driving in that occasion. The tires are about 50% of their initial tread depth. Most of the tires I have used would have made the corner easily at a considerably higher speed, but unfortunately Michelin's Energy Saver Plus failed in the most ridiculous way!
It's behavior, while good on dry roads, is really unpredictable on wet.
A real disgrace for Michelin. Avoid it at all costs if you drive on wet roads, for your own safety!

IO
io***@hotmail.com
Toyota Corolla · 175/65 R14 · 14 484 km
★★★★☆

Very good tyres in wet and dry roads. Low noise and very comfort.

LU
lu***@gmail.com
Citroën C3 · 195/55 R16 · 88 514 km
★★★☆☆

OE on a 2015 Citroën C3 1.2 PureTech.
Not the best Michelins imo
The big problem with these is the dry rotting of the whole tyre. It's pretty bad.
Grip is normal, as expected from a Michelin.
I can't recommend them because of the dry rotting problem.

Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?

Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.

Sign in