20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked
Standard-sport
Michelin Premium

PILOT SPORT 4 SUV

9.0 Outstanding
PTI – Pneutesty Index
✓ 9 tyre tests
PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 255/55 R19 among 45 available
tested in R19
Price from
75 800 Ft
in 255/55 R19
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Varianty pneumatiky (2)

Your size 255/55 R19 111Y XL EAN: 3528704130191 SAP: 413019
MICHELIN PILOT SPORT 4 SUV, RP
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 75 800 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Rim protection Rim protection
View prices →
Your size 255/55 R19 111V XL EAN: 3528709999083 SAP: 999908
MICHELIN PILOT SPORT 4 SUV, RP
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 77 295 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile Rim protection Rim protection
Rating and verdict

How the Pilot Sport 4 SUV evaluated

9.0 Outstanding
PTI – Pneutesty Index 9,0 / 10 PTI compared with all summer tyres · rank in size 255/55 R19 among 45 available
tested in R19
✓ Disciplíny
Wet z 36 meraní · 9 testov
beats 56 of 57
99 +7,6 %
Rozpad disciplíny „Wet“
wet braking 8 testov
beats 54 of 57
97 +12,4 %
Aquaplaning 8 testov
beats 45 of 47
98 +6,5 %
wet handling 9 testov
beats 44 of 48
96 +3,5 %
Dry z 15 meraní · 8 testov
beats 48 of 57
85 +2,8 %
Rozpad disciplíny „Dry“
dry braking 8 testov
beats 43 of 57
85 +4,5 %
dry handling 7 testov
beats 38 of 47
89 +1,5 %
Economy z 12 meraní · 8 testov
beats 24 of 48
51 +3,3 %
Rozpad disciplíny „Economy“
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 8 testov
beats 13 of 48
20 −6,3 %
durability (wear and abrasion) 1 test
beats 24 of 34
87 +36,3 %
Noise and comfort z 6 meraní · 8 testov
beats 31 of 47
67 ≈ average
Rozpad disciplíny „Noise and comfort“
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 6 testov
beats 16 of 47
28 ≈ average
ride comfort
beats 18 of 37
50 Not measured.
slabé 0+ slabšie 25+ priemerné 45+ dobré 60+ veľmi dobré 80+ špička 92+
✓ Silná a slabá stránka
Silná
Wet 99 % Dry 85 %
Zaostáva
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) −6 % za priemerom
🏆 Trophies from our data
🏆 best in the wet in size 255/55 R19 from 9 testov in the wet
🏆 Test winner 5× 1st place in 5 tests counted in PTI
🏆 Top 3 6× 1st–3rd place in 6 tests counted in PTI

Customer reviews are not part of PTI – PTI is based on measurements from independent tests; for tyres with few tests it also partly considers the brand's class.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
⚡
Balanced performance comfort + dynamics
🚗
For active drivers everyday driving
Reinforced profile
Reinforced profile Higher load capacity at higher pressure
Rim protection
Rim protection Protects the rim from kerbs

Where Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV stands in size 255/55 R19

Compared with 22 tyres in this size — same season and similar focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.

weakestbest
This tyre 9,0 75 800 Ft
Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 9.8 53 444 Ft better and cheaper Continental PREMIUMCONTACT 7 9.8 67 638 Ft better and cheaper Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6 9.6 65 098 Ft better and cheaper Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV 9.0 75 800 Ft This tyre Continental PREMIUMCONTACT 6 8.8 62 292 Ft Hankook K127A VENTUS S1 EVO3 SUV 8.4 56 695 Ft Pirelli P-ZERO (PZ4) S.C. 8.2 62 625 Ft Vredestein ULTRAC PRO 8.1 56 520 Ft Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 2 SUV 4X 7.9 57 299 Ft Kumho PS71EV ECSTA 7.9 43 832 Ft Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 3 SUV 7.6 57 840 Ft Toyo PROXES SPORT 2 7.6 47 198 Ft Uniroyal RAINSPORT 5 7.5 50 567 Ft Continental CONTISPORTCONTACT 5 7.4 63 327 Ft Vredestein ULTRAC VORTI+ 7.3 61 532 Ft Pirelli PZERO 7.0 64 021 Ft Nexen N'FERA SPORT SUV 7.0 43 804 Ft Yokohama V105 6.2 53 686 Ft Semperit SPEED-LIFE 2 6.1 56 853 Ft Triangle EFFEXSPORT TH202 5.5 39 850 Ft Nexen N'FERA RU1 5.4 45 907 Ft Barum BRAVURIS 5HM 4.9 47 828 Ft
4,9 median 7,6 9,8
4. rank in the group of 22 compared
82 % of tyres are weaker in this group
+1,4 above the group median group median 7,6
−0,8 behind the best in the group the best has 9,8
Show all tyres in the ranking (22)
  1. 1. 9.8 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV better and cheaper 53 444 Ft −22 356 Ft
  2. 1. 9.8 Continental PREMIUMCONTACT 7 better and cheaper 67 638 Ft −8 162 Ft
  3. 3. 9.6 Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6 better and cheaper 65 098 Ft −10 702 Ft
  4. 4. 9.0 Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV This tyre 75 800 Ft
  5. 5. 8.8 Continental PREMIUMCONTACT 6 62 292 Ft −13 508 Ft
  6. 6. 8.4 Hankook K127A VENTUS S1 EVO3 SUV 56 695 Ft −19 105 Ft
  7. 7. 8.2 Pirelli P-ZERO (PZ4) S.C. 62 625 Ft −13 175 Ft
  8. 8. 8.1 Vredestein ULTRAC PRO 56 520 Ft −19 280 Ft
  9. 9. 7.9 Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 2 SUV 4X 57 299 Ft −18 501 Ft
  10. 9. 7.9 Kumho PS71EV ECSTA 43 832 Ft −31 968 Ft
  11. 11. 7.6 Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 3 SUV 57 840 Ft −17 960 Ft
  12. 11. 7.6 Toyo PROXES SPORT 2 47 198 Ft −28 602 Ft
  13. 13. 7.5 Uniroyal RAINSPORT 5 50 567 Ft −25 233 Ft
  14. 14. 7.4 Continental CONTISPORTCONTACT 5 63 327 Ft −12 473 Ft
  15. 15. 7.3 Vredestein ULTRAC VORTI+ 61 532 Ft −14 268 Ft
  16. 16. 7.0 Pirelli PZERO 64 021 Ft −11 779 Ft
  17. 16. 7.0 Nexen N'FERA SPORT SUV 43 804 Ft −31 996 Ft
  18. 18. 6.2 Yokohama V105 53 686 Ft −22 114 Ft
  19. 19. 6.1 Semperit SPEED-LIFE 2 56 853 Ft −18 947 Ft
  20. 20. 5.5 Triangle EFFEXSPORT TH202 39 850 Ft −35 950 Ft
  21. 21. 5.4 Nexen N'FERA RU1 45 907 Ft −29 893 Ft
  22. 22. 4.9 Barum BRAVURIS 5HM 47 828 Ft −27 972 Ft
Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard-sport

A standard tyre with an added dose of sportiness — Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV is one of them. The basis stays balanced: comfort, quietness and tread life at the level of an ordinary tyre. The manufacturer adds a stiffer sidewall or a grippier compound, so the response is sharper at speed and through corners. The ideal is that none of it comes out of the tyre's mileage.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 255/55 R19
Width255 mm
Profile height55 %
Rim diameter19″
Load index (LI)111
Speed index (SI)Y
Product code413019
EAN3528704130191
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB (72 dB)
Manufacturer Michelin
Tread PILOT SPORT 4 SUV
Season Summer
Vehicle type SUV / 4×4
Available technologies
Zosilený profil Áno
Ochrana disku Áno - RP
Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV.
Compare →
Semperit SPEED-LIFE 2
Semperit
SPEED-LIFE 2
6.1
This tyre
Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV
Michelin
PILOT SPORT 4 SUV
9.0
from 75 800 Ft
Reference tyre
Compare →
Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6
Goodyear
EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6
9.6
from 65 098 Ft
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 3×
Wins 1×
Top 3 1×
Average placement 4,0
2026
5. place
Auto Bild Test letných SUV pneumatík 255/45 R19 2026
9 tyres
Detail →
2023
1. place
Auto Bild Test letných SUV pneumatík 225/65 R17 2023
12 tyres
Detail →
6. place
Auto Motor und Sport Summer Tire Test 255/45 R20 2023
10 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 255/55 R19.

Current lowest
75 799,95 Ft
↗ 42 341,18 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
178,23 Ft
15.9.2026
Highest for the period
75 799,95 Ft
23.10.2026
75 799,95 178,23 75 799,95 Ft 22.6.2026 23.10.2026 22.6.2026: 178,60 Ft 24.7.2026: 180,69 Ft 27.7.2026: 178,60 Ft 21.8.2026: 180,69 Ft 15.9.2026: 178,23 Ft 15.9.2026: 180,69 Ft 15.9.2026: 178,23 Ft 21.9.2026: 180,69 Ft 24.9.2026: 178,23 Ft 8.10.2026: 180,69 Ft 23.10.2026: 75 799,95 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

4,1
★★★★☆
from 32 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
42 366 km
Reliability:confidence-high
17
17***@noreg.com
Honda CRV · 235/55 R19 · 80 467 km
★★★☆☆

<p>For some reason I experienced lots of tyre roar from the PS4 SUV tyres despite rotation and alignment. In the end i waited for the MyCar Black Friday sale and got a set of Pirelli's in 19 inch and no more tyre noise. Maybe just unlucky but every Michelin i have purchased, i've always had noticeable tyre roar. Have stayed away from them and leaned towards Bridgestone and Pirelli for now.</p>

GR
gr***@gmail.com
Audi · 235/45 R21 · 24 140 km
★★★★☆

This review is intended to be a comparison of the same tyre on different cars, having experienced a full set of PS4 SUV with my previous Q5 from start to end. In this case, I progressively installed a front pair (due to a front puncture of the OE tyres), then a rear pair (due to wear of the OE tyres) on my Q4 e-tron which I have had for about 2 years. So this is for anyone cross-referencing the same tyre but who would like to find out the difference between a regular car and an EV.
Usually, SUVs come with regular tyres, some sporty but most of them are SUV-fitted tyres. My previous full set of PS4 SUV on the Q5 was preceded by the OE, then Latitude Sport. I found the improvement from one to the other very good, and never once was fuel consumption questioned because the figures were similar.
However, this time, I have progressively installed summer performance SUV tyres on my EV over the original EV-specific tyres (Turanza Eco). As Jon has highlighted before, the half-half setup of front performance and rear EV-specific tyres gave rise to a fun (but technically less safe) oversteering car which did not impact the energy consumption too much. I was getting about 6.4km/kWh for the first 10000km with full EV tyres, then about 5.9-6.1km/kWh for about 20000km on the mixed setup, which has gone down to 5.5-5.7km/kWh on the full PS4 SUV setup.
Apart from the figures, I feel that my Q4 e-tron is not rolling as efficiently as before as the tyres just feel a bit heavier. I'm jabbing at the accelerator fractionally longer, and not getting the same about of regeneration. Numerically, going from 6.4 down to 5.7 is not a great deal (just 10%), it does bother me as a numbers person. Over time, my decision to prioritise a higher performing tyre is going to cost me a bit more in the wallet. However, it also took a little bit of fun away from getting good consumption numbers to which I will have to get used to during the life of this tyre, which I expect to last at least 35000km. So far the fronts have eked out 20000km and the tread is still looking good, while the new rears have done less than 1000km.
At the speeds I'm allowed to drive, which is less than 100km/h, with frequent tropical rain, I don't think that my car really needs the full PS4 performance, and I'm thinking of switching to the PS5 Energy when the time is up for this set. I mean, it still feels great on the road, the grip is fantastic, and the braking is really stable and straight, but I'm not sure they are a good match for an EV.
Overall, these are great tyres. If consumption or rolling resistance is not your priority, they are still suitable for EVs. However, if you are an EV driver and want to save on costs and can give up a bit of grip for an EV-specific tyre which will perform almost similarly, you will be rewarded with exactly that.

QW
qw***@163.com
245/45 R20 · 96 561 km
★★★★☆

General Performance & Longevity
Mileage & Age: Purchased in September 2021, production date 0521. Currently at 95,000 km.
Driving Style: Mostly gentle driving, with occasional hard acceleration when necessary.
Dry/Wet: Surprisingly good grip in the rain; not prone to hydroplaning.
Comfort: Noise and comfort levels are acceptable/average.
️ Winter Performance (Latitude 40°N)
Conditions: Average winter temp of -7°C.
Traction: As expected for non-winter tires, they struggle significantly on snow ("sliding for sure").
Braking: Noticeable increase in braking distance in cold weather. I actually had a minor rear-end collision due to extended braking distance, costing me $50 in damages.
️ Durability & Weaknesses
Sidewall: The sidewalls are quite soft. This is the tire's biggest weakness.
Damage: I have scrapped 2 tires due to curb rash. One had exposed cords, and the other had a direct puncture in the sidewall.
Aging: The tread is now showing fine cracks (or weather cracks), likely accelerated by the freezing winter temperatures.
Verdict
After 5 years, they are definitely due for replacement. While the longevity is impressive, the soft sidewalls and lack of cold-weather braking safety are significant downsides.
Maybe I should repace a all season tyre.

JO
jo***@hampshire-commodities.co.uk
Lexus RX450H+ · 235/50 R21 · 322 km
★★★★★

My Lexus RX 450H+ came with Dunlop SP Sport Max fitted from new and the fronts have lasted a little over 18,000 miles getting to the wear indicator, the rears having around 5mm tread left but one of the rears had a bubble on the inner sidewall hence, the decision to change all 4 with Michelin offering £100 cash back making them good value compared to Bridgestone and Dunlop. Not many other brands offering this Tyre size from stock.
The Dunlop's never felt sure footed in the wet, they weren't bad but neither were they good however, in colder wet conditions the front would lose grip quite easily and living in the UK, these are very often the conditions we find ourselves in.
The Pilot Sport 4 SUV tyres immediately sound a little quieter which is a nice surprise but the main advantage being the front end has more authority, turn in is a little sharper and there is a smidge better feel through the steering wheel.
Wet grip is vastly improved over the Dunlop's, accelerating from rest in damp conditions results in front end traction that the Dunlop couldn't handle unless being easier with throttle input.
In all, while I can't yet provide any feedback on longevity, I am much happier with the Michelin's.

TO
to***@gmail.com
Land Rover Freelander 2 · 285/60 R18 · 8 047 km
★★★★☆

Replacing Pirelli Scorpions, the Michelins are a definite step up. In the dry the steering is far more precise, grip levels high and behavior at the limit clean and benign. Stopping distances are commendably short with excellent stability. If anything they are even more impressive in the wet with exceptionally strong lateral grip and progressive behavior at the limit. They are very resistant to
aquaplaning on flooded motorways. Road noise and rolling comfort are good but not exceptional. As I use extreme winter tyres
for half the year I have no idea how they would fare in snow or ice although they show commendably good behavior in low
temperatures unlike some summer tyres. So far they are wearing well. For on road use in above freezing conditions I strongly
recommend these tyres as being worth the high price and would happily buy again.

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in