Sailun Basic ATREZZO ZSR2
tested in R17 
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.
Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.
Varianty pneumatiky (2)
B 
A 
A Price from 27 908 Ft 
Reinforced profile B A A Price from 49 692 Ft Reinforced profile 
Rim protection Price comparison across shops pre EAN: 8935341213500
Current prices for size 215/50 R17.
Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.
How the Atrezzo ZSR2 evaluated
tested in R17 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured 
Wet Rozpad disciplíny „Wet“
Dry Rozpad disciplíny „Dry“
Economy Rozpad disciplíny „Economy“
Noise and comfort Rozpad disciplíny „Noise and comfort“
Wet 91 % Dry 87 % Economy worse than 90 % Noise and comfort worse than 89 % Customer reviews are not part of PTI – PTI is based on measurements from independent tests; for tyres with few tests it also partly considers the brand's class.
Where Sailun ATREZZO ZSR2 stands in size 215/50 R17
Compared with 14 tyres in this size — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.
Michelin PILOT SPORT 5 9.4 53 908 Ft 
Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT EVO 8.8 50 067 Ft 
Dunlop SPORT MAXX RT2 7.9 45 882 Ft 
Kumho ECSTA PS71 7.9 34 574 Ft 
Toyo PROXES SPORT 2 7.6 38 346 Ft Sailun ATREZZO ZSR2 7.5 27 908 Ft This tyre 
Uniroyal RAINSPORT 5 7.5 39 027 Ft 
Continental CONTISPORTCONTACT 5 7.4 50 741 Ft 
Fulda SPORTCONTROL 2 7.0 41 035 Ft 
Sava INTENSA UHP 2 7.0 38 607 Ft 
Debica PRESTO UHP 2 6.9 38 111 Ft 
Yokohama ADVAN FLEVA V701 6.5 46 438 Ft 
Nankang AS-2+ XL 6.2 27 286 Ft 
Triangle EFFEXSPORT TH202 5.5 21 970 Ft Triangle EFFEXSPORT TH202 21 970 Ft −5 939 Ft 9.4 best in the group Michelin PILOT SPORT 5 53 908 Ft +26 000 Ft Show all tyres in the ranking (14)
- 1. 9.4 53 908 Ft +26 000 Ft
- 2. 8.8 50 067 Ft +22 159 Ft
- 3. 7.9 45 882 Ft +17 973 Ft
- 3. 7.9 34 574 Ft +6 666 Ft
- 5. 7.6 38 346 Ft +10 438 Ft
- 6. 7.5 27 908 Ft
- 6. 7.5 39 027 Ft +11 119 Ft
- 8. 7.4 50 741 Ft +22 833 Ft
- 9. 7.0 41 035 Ft +13 127 Ft
- 9. 7.0 38 607 Ft +10 699 Ft
- 11. 6.9 38 111 Ft +10 202 Ft
- 12. 6.5 46 438 Ft +18 529 Ft
- 13. 6.2 27 286 Ft −622 Ft
- 14. 5.5 21 970 Ft −5 939 Ft
Technical information
Focus: Sport
With sport tyres, grip in every situation is what decides — under hard acceleration, under braking, in the dry and in the wet. Sailun ATREZZO ZSR2 belongs to this group. Stability at higher speeds and precision through corners come on top of that. One thing drivers often underestimate when buying: grip comes from a softer compound, and a softer compound wears faster. Where a standard tyre covers roughly 40,000 km, a sport tyre manages about 20,000 to 30,000 km — and considerably less with a sharper driving style or a heavier, more powerful car.
B A A (69 dB) Competitors
Main competitors in the same price range.
Which tests it appeared in
0× 
1× 
How the price has evolved
Lowest price across shops for size 215/50 R17.
The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.
What owners say
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 tires are decent budget summer tires, but they have some noticeable weaknesses. On a car with a well-tuned chassis like the BMW G21, they lack steering precision and overall handling compared to better-quality tires. Despite being properly balanced, they also developed vibrations that were most likely caused by temporary flat spots after standing. Noise levels are acceptable—they are moderately quiet, but nothing exceptional. Overall, they offer reasonable value for the price, but I would not buy them again.
Good price preformace
Running ZSR2 on my Tesla Model 3 Performance. On paper, the specs are great (EU label B/A/69dB), and they are honestly quiet and comfy for daily driving. However, wet grip is a weak point—I find the ESC kicking in too easy on wet corners.
The wear rate is the real dealbreaker: 1.6mm (rear) and 1.0mm (front) gone in just 2,500 miles. At this rate, even with frequent rotations, they’ll hit the wear bars by 12,300 miles. They might be cheap to buy, but the poor longevity makes them a bad value in the long run.
Tires wore out rather quickly, got one season out of them, lasted more like 20K Km if even that, otherwise good enough grip on dry and wet tarmac, kind of squirrelly/ not very confidence inspiring on gravel, although thats to be expected.
Moved from worn out PZero pz4 (the rears were had 4mm left so stored in case new fronts wear out earlier) and have to say mpg is 22.2 for a L320 4.2 SC RRS which is a wee bit better than the Pirelli’s with road hum reduced at 70+mph. Great alternative although I only expect them to last maybe 10-13K miles whereas the previous lasted 18-20 but at just half the price. Bodes well.