Toyo Mid-range CF2 Proxes
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
We currently don't have a variant for the selected combination.
Price comparison across shops
Vo vašom rozmere 165/60 R14 túto pneumatiku momentálne nepredáva ani jeden zo sledovaných e-shopov.
Nevadí — pozrite si priame alternatívy medzi konkurenciou alebo to, ako pneumatika obstála v testoch.
How the Proxes CF2 evaluated
Skóre vychádza z 1 nezávislého testu a z 106 recenzií vodičov. ?
The number shows what percentage of the best tyre’s performance in the test this tyre achieved in this discipline.
Wet good 93,3 Dry very good 97,5 Wet good 93,3 Dry very good 97,5 The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 165/60 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Technical information
Focus: Standard
The largest and best-selling category, and Toyo CF2 Proxes belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.
C 
B 
B (70 dB) No technologies are listed for this size.
Konkurencia
Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.
How the price has evolved
We don't have price history for this size yet.
What owners say
<p>This was my second set Toyos and the reason I went with them was the fact that I was really pleased with them the first time. That being said, these CF2s left me quite disappointed.</p><p>For context, I don’t put that many kms on my tires so I would expect their lifespan to generally be good. With these though, after almost 4 years and less than 15000 kms, they needed replacement. Wear was absolutely horrendous, as was their resistance to time.</p><p>For a fully garaged car, that sees no direct sunlight nor gets driven in extremely hot or cold climates I noticed that the tires became extremely stiff after 2.5 to 3 years. Initial handling on both wet and dry was quite nice as well as feedback and overall handling (for a comfort tire that is) but this was compounded as mentioned by their utter lack of longevity.</p><p>For their price range I would not recommend them.</p>
<p>The car is a toyota Auris. We have a CF2 tyre on rear wheel and have noticed it has cracking on the side wall of the tyre where the wall meets the tread. There is lots of tread left on the tyre 5mm. Tyre is about a year old. All other tyres on car (which are not CF2s) are ok.</p>
Comparing to Michelin Energy Saver, these ones are not worse. The rubber quality is actually higher and wet handling potentially better. One thing for sure - they are quieter and I love that. Nice riding feel, planted, grippy enough and above all I feel they are safe. I have even provoked them in the snow (mixed with rain but even then) and had a really hard time losing control with them in the rear (hand brake and all).
Price has raised since I bought them back in 2021 (paid 65€ for each assembled), but they still are great tyres.
The tyres were already mounted on my 2002 Camaro. Only 4 years old they already start to show small cracks on the whole tyre.
99% I agree with the car magazine test regarding performance. Quiet, low rolling resistance. Wet performance disappointing.
Not a bad tyre but those cracks came quite early.
Will change them to all season tyres.
The dry and wet grip are very good. The wear rate is very acceptable. They lasted for 5 years, 28 thousand miles. The shoulder wears faster and when this happens they loose performance noticiably. I have used HANKOOK SOLUS, YOKOHAMA SPORT ADVAN SPORT AS, this toyo have out performed this tires.
Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?
Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.
Sign in