20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Yokohama Premium

AW21

6.5
PTI – Pneutesty Index
average ✓ 6 tyre tests
PTI compared with all all-season tyres · rank in size 235/50 R20 among 17 available
tested only in R16, R17 noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
Price from
61 326 Ft
in 235/50 R20
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For all-season tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Your size 235/50 R20 Speed / Load: 104W XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB Price from 61 326 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile M+S M+S 3PMSF 3PMSF Rim protection Rim protection
View prices →
Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Current prices for size 235/50 R20.

Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.

Rating and verdict

How the BluEarth 4S AW21 evaluated

6.5
PTI – Pneutesty Index 6,5 / 10 · average PTI compared with all all-season tyres · rank in size 235/50 R20 among 17 available
tested only in R16, R17 noise and comfort: only 20 % measured incomplete measurement: comfort from noise only
Discipline Percentile worsegroup averagebest Gap ⓘ Tests
Snow 50
≈ average 3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 86
+4 % 3 Tests
snow traction 56
+1 % 3 Tests
snow handling 35
≈ average 2 Tests
Wet 18
−4 % 6 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 38
≈ average 6 tests
Aquaplaning 26
−4 % 3 Tests
wet handling 61
+1 % 2 Tests
Dry 13
−5 % 6 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 16
−4 % 6 tests
dry handling 61
≈ average 2 Tests
Ice –
Not measured. 2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (2)
ice braking 36
≈ average 2 Tests
ice traction 31
−7 % 1 test
Economy 9
−14 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 4
−10 % 3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion) 14
−14 % 2 Tests
Noise and comfort 3
‹
−3 % 3 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 3
‹
−2 % 3 Tests
Where it is strong
no discipline in the group's top quarter
Where it falls behind
Wetworse than 82 % · −4 %
Dryworse than 87 % · −5 %
Economyworse than 91 % · −14 %
Noise and comfortworse than 97 % · −3 %

Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway
Reinforced profile
Reinforced profile Higher load capacity at higher pressure
M+S
M+S Suitable for mud and snow
3PMSF
3PMSF Certified for winter conditions
Rim protection
Rim protection Protects the rim from kerbs

Where Yokohama AW21 stands in size 235/50 R20

Compared with 15 tyres in this size — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.

14. rank in the group of 15 compared
−2,1 below the group median group median 8,6
−3,5 behind the best in the group the best has 10,0
💡 A better rating for less money In this group there are 2 tyres with a better score that are also cheaper.
Show all tyres in the ranking (15)
  1. 1. 10 Goodyear VECTOR ALL SEASON 4 75 495 Ft +14 169 Ft
  2. 2. 9.9 Hankook IL01A ION FLEXCLIMATE SUV 73 612 Ft +12 286 Ft
  3. 3. 9.8 Michelin CROSSCLIMATE 3 88 412 Ft +27 087 Ft
  4. 4. 9.5 Continental ALLSEASONCONTACT 2 76 119 Ft +14 793 Ft
  5. 5. 9.1 Goodyear VECTOR 4SEASONS GEN-3 76 493 Ft +15 168 Ft
  6. 6. 8.9 Bridgestone TURANZA ALL SEASON 6 69 026 Ft +7 700 Ft
  7. 7. 8.6 Michelin CROSSCLIMATE 2 SUV 88 795 Ft +27 469 Ft
  8. 7. 8.6 Hankook H750A KINERGY 4S2 X 66 344 Ft +5 018 Ft
  9. 9. 8.5 Nokian Tyres SEASONPROOF 2 64 324 Ft +2 998 Ft
  10. 10. 7.7 Uniroyal ALLSEASONEXPERT 3 68 274 Ft +6 948 Ft
  11. 11. 7.5 Nexen N'BLUE 4SEASON 2 better and cheaper 51 552 Ft −9 774 Ft
  12. 12. 7.2 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2 63 464 Ft +2 139 Ft
  13. 13. 7.0 Maxxis PREMITRA ALL SEASON SUV AP3 SUV better and cheaper 56 304 Ft −5 022 Ft
  14. 14. 6.5 Yokohama AW21 This tyre 61 326 Ft
  15. 15. 5.8 Nankang CROSS SEASONS AW-6 53 878 Ft −7 448 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

61 326 Ft ÷ 36 265 km × 100
169 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 235/50 R20 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Goodyear VECTOR 4SEASONS GEN-3 141 Ft
Yokohama AW21 169 Ft
Continental ALLSEASONCONTACT 2 183 Ft

Goodyear VECTOR 4SEASONS GEN-3 works out cheaper per 100 km.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Yokohama AW21 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 235/50 R20
Width235 mm
Profile height50 %
Rim diameter20″
Load index (LI)104
Speed index (SI)W
Product codeR8518
EAN4548515048941
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB (72 dB)
Manufacturer Yokohama
Tread AW21
Season All-season
Vehicle type Passenger car
Available technologies
Zosilený profil Áno - XL/RF
M+S Áno - M+S
3PMSF 3PMSF Áno
Ochrana disku Áno - RPB
Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Yokohama AW21.
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 3×
Wins 0×
Top 3 0×
Average placement 8,7
2025
6. place
Motor Test of all-season tires 215/55 R17 2025
7 tyres
Detail →
2024
6. place
Tyrereviews All-season tire test 205/55 R16 2024
7 tyres
Detail →
14. place
ADAC All-season Tire Test 205/55 R16 2024
16 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 235/50 R20.

Current lowest
61 325,76 Ft
↗ 36 185,28 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
154,62 Ft
7.9.2026
Highest for the period
61 325,76 Ft
14.10.2026
61 325,76 154,62 61 325,76 Ft 22.6.2026 14.10.2026 22.6.2026: 169,01 Ft 27.8.2026: 165,09 Ft 3.9.2026: 166,31 Ft 7.9.2026: 154,62 Ft 11.9.2026: 166,31 Ft 12.9.2026: 154,62 Ft 21.9.2026: 157,71 Ft 24.9.2026: 154,62 Ft 8.10.2026: 157,71 Ft 14.10.2026: 61 325,76 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

3,4
★★★☆☆
from 7 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
36 265 km
Reliability:confidence-high · from 1 source test
OZ
oz***@gmail.com
Fiat Bravo · 225/45 R17 · 805 km
★★★☆☆

Previously I drove on Firestone Multiseason 2, which are my point of reference. Unfortunately they have dry rotted prematurely so I have opted to go for a different brand (on a side note the car was stored in harsh conditions so I can understand that that was the main issue).
The Yokohamas seem more winter oriented and they are overall decent, I have not noticed anything unusual, except for the road noise which is a bit of a killer. They legitimately howl like banshees :D I am not going to buy these again mainly because of that.

JO
jo***@gmail.com
Suzuki vitara s 1,4 boosterjet · 215/55 R17 · 16 km
★★★★☆

The first 2 years with these tyres was brilliant! Smooth drive quiet with very little road noise noticed. Summer months the tyres were fine not very sporty, noticed as the temperatures got up to 30°c they felt very soft going around corners.
Autumn into winter is were these tyres are great! The wet grip is excellent and feels like a normal summer tyre. When the snow arrived I was really impressed how much grip they gave going up hills even braking on snow was very good. Into the 3rd year of ownership and cracks started to appear on the tread blocks where it contacts the road, also noticed that road noise has increased with the ride feeling harsher than before. Seems like most all season tyres suffer from this hardening of the tyre surface into the 3rd year of use. I doubt I would buy these again due to this.

RO
ro***@ntlworld.com
BMW 435d · 225/45 R17 · 3 219 km
★★★★★

They have been excellent over the winter months, they feel very solid on seriously wet roads and motorways and when it has been icy there hasn’t been any slip or loss of traction when accelerating or braking. No use in snowy conditions or warm hot weather as yet. Very glad I swapped my Primacy 3’s, nice in the dry but to me they didn’t feel solid particularly on wet motorways, these are a vast improvement in the wet.

GI
gi***@gmail.com
Subaru XV 2.0 D · 225/45 R17 · 1 609 km
★★★★☆

OE tyres G95A by Yokohama, M+S designed with not that good performance on wet. Tyres are somewhat designed for "all terrain" use, Geolandar series, so it was not a surprise. Then I switched to G055 M+S tyres over again, good tread wear, good in the wet and in the dry, sufficient in the snow as the G95A was -the AWD proved axcellent and overtaking winter tyres equipped cars-. Last I put on weather control A005 from Bridgestone, very good in dry and et, but too winter oriented and soft compound, tread wear not an asset at all -blistering noted on the edges after 30,000 km, trew them away.
I drove 80,000 miles with the liste tyres, then I put on the 4S AW21, giving credit to Yokohama first real all season tyre. They are developed from a summer tyre as far as I know, I hope this is true as the tread depth is not excessive.
So far so good, wet and dry performance is very good, cornering in the wet is excellent wiht my car. Only lihgt snow tested, but I do not pretend that much as I rely on the AWD and even a fair performance becomes a good performance thanks to the symmetrical AWD with the viscous centre diff and limited slip, so the snow and ice ratings are not a reason of choice for me.
First impression was they are a bit better than the Bridgestone A005, but performance may dramatically change according to tyre size and vehicle, on my car this tyre by far outperforms the bridgestone A005, althouhg my expectation was not to that direction.

QU
qu***@hotmail.co.uk
Skoda · 205/60 R19 · 23 km
★★★☆☆

I fitted 2 YOKOHAMA "BLUE EARTH" tyres to the front of my car May 2017.After only 14,632 miles one had a crack running the full circumference of the outer tread next to the outer wall. I found it very difficult to contact YOKOHAMA and l still had no reply after 3 weeks.
AVON ZV5 same size fitted to the same position on the same vehicle reached 21,145 .Fitted to the rear 28,000, performance wet and dry roads was very similar to that of the YOKOHAMA.

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in