19 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 120+ tests 280 000+ prices tracked
Tyre Reviews 2023 Winter test 9 tyres

Tyrereviews Winter SUV Tire Test 235/60 R18 2023

Winter SUV tire test

Size
235/60 R18
Season
Winter
Segment
Passenger car
tyre tests.
9
Published
2023
Build your own

Build a comparison from this test

Select tyres and metrics — the visualisation redraws instantly.

1
Select tyres
3 / 5

Top 3 by default. For a clear comparison, max. 5 tyres.

2
Select metrics to compare
4 Selected

Each metric has its own visualisation. Click a chip to add/remove.

3
Your comparison
Braking distance in the wet Braking distance in the wet m · ↓ lower is better
PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV has lowest — by 0,1 m before LM005.
Braking distance in the dry Braking distance in the dry m · ↓ lower is better
PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV has lowest — by 0,8 m before WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P.
Noise Noise dB · ↓ lower is better
PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV has lowest — by 1,9 dB before LM005.
Estimated mileage Estimated mileage km · ↑ higher is better
WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P has highest — by 6 029 km before PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV.
test

Informácie o teste

Can 4x4 drive save cheap tires on snow and water?

Can a heavy SUV with all-wheel drive hide the shortcomings of cheaper tires, or is premium footwear the only safety guarantee? An extensive test of nine high-performance winter tires in the popular 235/60 R18 size examined their limits on snow, water, and dry asphalt. The testing also focused on noise, comfort, and rolling resistance, which is key for electric vehicles.

The clear champion on snow and in wet braking became the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV tire, while the titles for wet handling and fuel economy were split between Pirelli and Continental.

Snow: Absolute premium dominance and a total budget flop

  • King of winter roads: The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV tire played in a league of its own on snow. It found traction and lateral grip where others failed, confirming that even a heavy AWD vehicle cannot change the physical limits of a top-tier tire.
  • Braking and Traction: In snow braking distance, the Hankook Winter I*Cept Evo3 narrowly triumphed over the Nokian. In acceleration and grip, Michelin dominated once again, followed by the newcomer Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2.
  • Hazard at the back: The budget Leao tire lagged behind the top performers in both braking distance and grip characteristics by a frightening 20%. On snow, it offered zero grip and did not meet the appropriate safety standard.

Wet road: Close battles and the aquaplaning champion

  • Handling: The top four tires (Pirelli, Goodyear, Continental, Michelin) were separated in lap time by an incredible 0.4%. The fastest time and best sporty feel were delivered by the Pirelli tire, while Goodyear and Maxxis scored with exemplary predictability and confidence at the limit.
  • Wet braking: The shortest braking distance was achieved by Michelin, closely followed by Bridgestone.
  • Battling deep water: In both longitudinal and lateral aquaplaning, the Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV pulled significantly ahead of its rivals, beating the second-placed Bridgestone with a huge margin.

Dry conditions, comfort, and rolling resistance (ideal for EVs)

  • Consumption and range: If you drive an electric vehicle or are looking for maximum fuel economy, Continental demonstrated the lowest rolling resistance with a historically largest lead over the competition. Second place went to Bridgestone.
  • Comfort and noise: The most pleasant and quietest companion for long distances was Michelin, along with the Bridgestone and Goodyear tires. The Pirelli tire offered a quiet, low-frequency sound, but had a somewhat firmer chassis feel.
  • Dry braking: In the only test where the Chinese Leao surprisingly performed well, it managed to narrowly beat the top-tier Pirelli.

Verdict: Which tire should you choose?

  • For extreme winter and snow: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV (unmatched by competition).
  • For wet roads and fast driving: Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2 and Goodyear.
  • For electric vehicles and low consumption: Continental (unbeaten rolling resistance).
  • Affordable and safe choice: Hankook or Maxxis.
  • Budget tires (Leao): Avoid them – not even 4x4 drive will save you on snow and water with these tires.

Tyrereviews Winter SUV Tire Test 235/60 R18 2023

9 products · click a column to sort
# Tyre Price from Dry braking [m] Dry manoeuvring [s] Wet braking [m] Wet manoeuvring [s] Aquaplaning straight [km/h] Aquaplaning cornering [m/s²] Snow braking [m] Snow manoeuvring [s] Snow traction [s] Volume [dB] Rolling resistance [kg/t]
1. Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P ✓ Available in size 235/60 R18 from 61 464 Ft 43.02 66.28 33.06 73.45 84.9 3.73 16.21 90.85 3.68 71.1 6.493
2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV ✓ Available in size 235/60 R18 from 61 922 Ft 42.15 66.61 32.86 73.55 86.1 3.63 16.06 88.65 3.53 68.9 8.186
3. Bridgestone LM005 ✓ Available in size 235/60 R18 from 58 740 Ft 43.46 66.63 33.03 73.85 88.7 4.08 16.24 94.9 3.56 70.8 7.248
3. Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X 42.93 66.27 33.32 73.9 86.6 4 15.92 92.35 3.62 74.6 7.459
5. Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV ✕ Unavailable in size 235/60 R18 44.18 66.88 34.11 74.13 90.7 4.3 15.97 93.25 3.67 72.2 8.221
6. Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 2 ✓ Available in size 235/60 R18 from 64 369 Ft 41.52 66.11 34.64 73.11 85.8 3.42 16.23 92.05 3.54 70 8.43
7. Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + SUV ✓ Available in size 235/60 R18 from 70 453 Ft 43.75 67.36 33.64 73.33 85.3 3.4 16.13 91.9 3.65 70.5 8.476
8. Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 SUV 42.63 66.37 35.11 74.56 88.3 3.6 16.31 96.3 3.76 70.9 8.467
9. Leao WINT.DEFENDER UHP ✕ Unavailable in size 235/60 R18 41.45 67.11 34.75 76.14 85.3 3.64 19.46 94.6 4.51 72 7.772

Dry braking [m]

🏆 Leao WINT.DEFENDER UHP
41.5
Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 2
41.5
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
42.2
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 SUV
42.6
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
42.9
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
43

Dry manoeuvring [s]

🏆 Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 2
66.1
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
66.3
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
66.3
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 SUV
66.4
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
66.6
Bridgestone LM005
66.6

Wet braking [m]

🏆 Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
32.9
Bridgestone LM005
33
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
33.1
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
33.3
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + SUV
33.6
Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV
34.1

Wet manoeuvring [s]

🏆 Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 2
73.1
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + SUV
73.3
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
73.5
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
73.6
Bridgestone LM005
73.9
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
73.9

Aquaplaning straight [km/h]

🏆 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV
90.7
Bridgestone LM005
88.7
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 SUV
88.3
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
86.6
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
86.1
Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 2
85.8

Aquaplaning cornering [m/s²]

🏆 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV
4.3
Bridgestone LM005
4.1
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
4
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
3.7
Leao WINT.DEFENDER UHP
3.6
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
3.6

Snow braking [m]

🏆 Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
15.9
Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV
16
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
16.1
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + SUV
16.1
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
16.2
Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 2
16.2

Snow manoeuvring [s]

🏆 Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
88.7
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
90.9
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + SUV
91.9
Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 2
92.1
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
92.4
Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV
93.3

Snow traction [s]

🏆 Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
3.5
Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 2
3.5
Bridgestone LM005
3.6
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
3.6
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + SUV
3.7
Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV
3.7

Volume [dB]

🏆 Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
68.9
Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 2
70
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP PERFORMANCE + SUV
70.5
Bridgestone LM005
70.8
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 SUV
70.9
Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
71.1

Rolling resistance [kg/t]

🏆 Continental WINTERCONTACT TS 870 P
6.5
Bridgestone LM005
7.2
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
7.5
Leao WINT.DEFENDER UHP
7.8
Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 SUV
8.2
Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV
8.2

Winter SUV tire test

Read the original article →