Comparison Bridgestone LM001E vs Bridgestone LM005

Bridgestone

Overall rating

PTI – Pneutesty Index

7,0

9,4

Discipline comparison

Snow

28 −1 %

2 Tests len z brzdenia a ovládateľnosti

72 +2 %

35 tests

what it consists of Snow (3)

snow braking

28 −3 %

2 Tests

80 +3 %

31 tests

snow traction

– Not measured.

73 +2 %

27 tests

snow handling

36 ≈ average

2 Tests

58 ≈ average

26 tests

Wet

58 +4 %

2 Tests

99 +11 %

35 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

56 +4 %

2 Tests

100 +14 %

30 tests

Aquaplaning

61 +5 %

2 Tests

91 +9 %

29 tests

wet handling

52 ≈ average

2 Tests

98 +4 %

26 tests

Dry

52 ≈ average

2 Tests

71 ≈ average

29 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

43 ≈ average

2 Tests

55 ≈ average

29 tests

dry handling

58 ≈ average

2 Tests

88 ≈ average

25 tests

Ice

– Not measured.

13 −4 %

3 Tests

what it consists of Ice (1)

ice braking

– Not measured.

14 −4 %

3 Tests

Economy

62 +2 %

2 Tests bez opotrebenia

57 −2 %

30 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

58 ≈ average

2 Tests

94 +7 %

29 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

– Not measured.

17 −17 %

9 tests weakness

Noise and comfort

31 ≈ average

2 Tests noise only

95 ≈ average

29 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

46 ≈ average

2 Tests

29 ≈ average

27 tests

ride comfort

– Not measured.

74 Not measured.

Technologies

3PMSF

✓ Only in some sizes

M+S

✓ Only in some sizes

Rim protection

✓ Only in some sizes

ROF

✓ Only in some sizes

Sound

✓ Only in some sizes

Suitable for EVs

✓ Only in some sizes

Reinforced profile

✓ Only in some sizes

Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF*

M+S*

OE*

Rim protection*

ROF*

Sound*

Suitable for EVs*

Reinforced profile*

3PMSF*

M+S*

OE*

Rim protection*

ROF*

Sound*

Suitable for EVs*

Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres

Bridgestone LM001E

Bridgestone LM005

Snow

28 −1 %

2 Tests len z brzdenia a ovládateľnosti

72 +2 %

35 tests

what it consists of Snow (3)

snow braking

28 −3 %

2 Tests

80 +3 %

31 tests

snow traction

– Not measured.

73 +2 %

27 tests

snow handling

36 ≈ average

2 Tests

58 ≈ average

26 tests

Wet

58 +4 %

2 Tests

99 +11 %

35 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

56 +4 %

2 Tests

100 +14 %

30 tests

Aquaplaning

61 +5 %

2 Tests

91 +9 %

29 tests

wet handling

52 ≈ average

2 Tests

98 +4 %

26 tests

Dry

52 ≈ average

2 Tests

71 ≈ average

29 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

43 ≈ average

2 Tests

55 ≈ average

29 tests

dry handling

58 ≈ average

2 Tests

88 ≈ average

25 tests

Ice

– Not measured.

13 −4 %

3 Tests

what it consists of Ice (1)

ice braking

– Not measured.

14 −4 %

3 Tests

Economy

62 +2 %

2 Tests bez opotrebenia

57 −2 %

30 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

58 ≈ average

2 Tests

94 +7 %

29 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

– Not measured.

17 −17 %

9 tests weakness

Noise and comfort

31 ≈ average

2 Tests noise only

95 ≈ average

29 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

46 ≈ average

2 Tests

29 ≈ average

27 tests

ride comfort

– Not measured.

74 Not measured.