Comparison Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV vs Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,9
9,0
Discipline comparison
Wet 99 +9 %
100 +9 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
97 +12 %
Aquaplaning
69 +3 %
98 +6 % ▲
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
96 +4 %
Dry 98 +5 % ▲
90 +4 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
85 +5 %
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
89 +2 %
Economy 65 +2 % ▲
47 +4 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 % ▲
19 −6 %
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 %
87 +36 % ▲
Noise and comfort 98 ≈ average ▲
77 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
27 ≈ average
ride comfort
83 Not measured. ▲
49 Not measured.
Technologies
OE ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
ROF ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Sound ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile ✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Suitable for EVs –
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison
Technologies
Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.
OE* Rim protection* ROF* Sound* Reinforced profile* OE* Rim protection* ROF* Sound* Reinforced profile* Suitable for EVs* * Only in some sizes
Comparison
Discipline comparison
A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres
9.9 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
9.0 Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 SUV
Wet 99 +9 %
100 +9 % ▲
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 8 tests 8 tests
99 +13 % ▲
97 +12 %
Aquaplaning 6 tests 8 tests
69 +3 %
98 +6 % ▲
wet handling 5 tests 9 tests
99 +4 % ▲
96 +4 %
Dry 98 +5 % ▲
90 +4 %
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 8 tests 8 tests
97 +6 % ▲
85 +5 %
dry handling 9 tests 7 tests
99 +2 % ▲
89 +2 %
Economy 65 +2 % ▲
47 +4 %
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 5 tests 8 tests
44 −5 % ▲
19 −6 %
durability (wear and abrasion) 2 Tests 1 test 1 test
83 +12 %
87 +36 % ▲
Noise and comfort 98 ≈ average ▲
77 ≈ average
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 7 tests 6 tests
91 ≈ average ▲
27 ≈ average
ride comfort
83 Not measured. ▲
49 Not measured.