20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV vs Nexen N'FERA RU1

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
9,9
5,4
Discipline comparison
Wet
99 +9 % ▲
11 tests
33 +2 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
8 tests
42 +2 %
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
69 +3 % ▲
6 tests
29 −2 %
1 test 1 test
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
5 tests
39 ≈ average
2 Tests
Dry
98 +5 % ▲
11 tests
38 −1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
8 tests
44 −2 %
3 Tests
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
9 tests
24 −1 %
3 Tests
Economy
65 +2 % ▲
5 tests
18 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 % ▲
5 tests
17 −17 %
1 test 1 test
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 %
2 Tests
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort
98 ≈ average ▲
8 tests
26 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
44 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
ride comfort
83 Not measured.
– Not measured.
Technologies
OE OE
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
ROF ROF
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Sound Sound
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF* Sound (noise reduction) Sound*
OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

9.9 Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
5.4 Nexen N'FERA RU1
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
Wet
99 +9 % ▲
11 tests
33 +2 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
99 +13 % ▲
8 tests
42 +2 %
3 Tests
Aquaplaning
69 +3 % ▲
6 tests
29 −2 %
1 test 1 test
wet handling
99 +4 % ▲
5 tests
39 ≈ average
2 Tests
Dry
98 +5 % ▲
11 tests
38 −1 %
3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
97 +6 % ▲
8 tests
44 −2 %
3 Tests
dry handling
99 +2 % ▲
9 tests
24 −1 %
3 Tests
Economy
65 +2 % ▲
5 tests
18 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
44 −5 % ▲
5 tests
17 −17 %
1 test 1 test
durability (wear and abrasion)
83 +12 %
2 Tests
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort
98 ≈ average ▲
8 tests
26 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
91 ≈ average ▲
7 tests
44 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
ride comfort
83 Not measured.
– Not measured.