4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kleber Dynaxer Hp2 vs Kleber DYNAXER HP4

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
–
7,0
Discipline comparison
Wet
–
57 +3 %
8 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
–
65 +3 %
5 tests
Aquaplaning
–
65 ≈ average
4 Tests
wet handling
–
4 ≈ average
3 Tests
Dry
–
54 +1 %
7 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
–
63 +1 %
4 Tests
dry handling
–
9 ≈ average
3 Tests
Economy
–
80 +4 %
4 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
–
85 +4 %
4 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
–
72 +3 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
–
56 +1 %
4 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
–
98 +1 %
4 Tests
Technologies
Rim protection Rim protection
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
–
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

none
Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 from 18 measurements · 8 tests
beats 145 of 256
57 +2,5 %
Subcategories wet

wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 5 tests
beats 165 of 256
65 +2,5 %

Aquaplaning

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 132 of 205
65 ≈ average

wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 3 tests
beats 7 of 204
4 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 from 7 measurements · 7 tests
beats 137 of 257
54 +1,2 %
Subcategories dry

dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 162 of 256
63 +1,4 %

dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 3 tests
beats 17 of 203
9 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 from 9 measurements · 4 tests
beats 165 of 207
80 +3,5 %
Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 173 of 205
85 +4,0 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 92 of 129
72 +2,7 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 from 4 measurements · 4 tests noise only
beats 114 of 204
56 +1,4 %
Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Kleber Dynaxer Hp2
– Not measured.
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 4 tests
beats 198 of 202
98 +1,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.