20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kleber DYNAXER HP4 vs Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,0
5,4
Discipline comparison
Wet
56 +2 % ▲
8 tests
39 +2 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
65 +2 % ▲
5 tests
57 +2 %
1 test 1 test
Aquaplaning
61 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
3 −3 %
1 test 1 test
wet handling
4 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
2 −1 %
1 test 1 test
Dry
54 +1 %
7 tests
71 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
64 +1 %
4 Tests
77 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
dry handling
10 ≈ average
3 Tests
17 ≈ average ▲
1 test 1 test
Economy
80 +4 %
4 Tests
97 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
85 +4 %
4 Tests
96 +18 % ▲
1 test 1 test
durability (wear and abrasion)
71 +3 %
4 Tests
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort
56 +1 % ▲
4 Tests noise only
44 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
98 +1 % ▲
4 Tests
74 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
Technologies
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
3PMSF 3PMSF
–
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* Rim protection Rim protection*
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* 3PMSF 3PMSF*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

7.0 Kleber DYNAXER HP4
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured
5.4 Kleber DYNAXER HP5 SUV
provisional PTI
Wet
56 +2 % ▲
8 tests
39 +2 %
2 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
65 +2 % ▲
5 tests
57 +2 %
1 test 1 test
Aquaplaning
61 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
3 −3 %
1 test 1 test
wet handling
4 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
2 −1 %
1 test 1 test
Dry
54 +1 %
7 tests
71 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
64 +1 %
4 Tests
77 +4 % ▲
1 test 1 test
dry handling
10 ≈ average
3 Tests
17 ≈ average ▲
1 test 1 test
Economy
80 +4 %
4 Tests
97 from 1 measurement ▲
1 test 1 test bez opotrebenia
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
85 +4 %
4 Tests
96 +18 % ▲
1 test 1 test
durability (wear and abrasion)
71 +3 %
4 Tests
– Not measured.
Noise and comfort
56 +1 % ▲
4 Tests noise only
44 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
98 +1 % ▲
4 Tests
74 ≈ average
1 test 1 test